#Prop69 is getting everyone talking about CosmWasm so I thought it would be useful to explain what it is (while careful ignoring the hot debate around its implementation in the Cosmos Hub) 🧵
Unlike virtual-machine blockchains (like Ethereum) where everything is programmed as a set of smart contracts, the Cosmos SDK is a framework for application-specific blockchains
The framework is designed to build blockchains out of composable modules. Anyone can create a module, and integrating already-built modules is straightforward
CosmWasm is one such module. It's an implementation of WASM (WebAssembly) running on top of a Cosmos SDK application.
You can think of WebAssembly as the equivalent of the EVM: it serves as an intermediate language to compile the developer’s language into a portable virtual machine
WebAssembly is maintained by the World Wide Web Consortium which includes Web2 giants like Mozilla, Microsoft, Google & Apple
CosmWasm is actually just one of several projects funded by @interchain_io to build a virtual machine on top of Tendermint, as a module for Cosmos
But CosmWasm is especially popular because it allows developers to write modules in Rust, which is consistently voted as one of the best general-purpose programming language for performance and safety
It gives chains the ability to upload code in transactions, without the need to restart. That allows for a much quicker deployment of new features
And while Juno, which uses CosmWasm, has enabled the default permissionless uploading of smart contracts, other chains can easily limit smart contract deployment to governance
Aside from Juno, CosmWasm is used in production by a lot of big name blockchains including Terra, Secret, Nym, Fetch, Persistence, Crypto(dot)org, and soon others like Osmosis
I'm planning to make a thread as objective as possible about the need (or lack thereof) for CosmWasm on the Cosmos Hub in the coming days
I also write educative & digestible threads on other topics such as airdrops, tokens, teams & projects, so you may consider giving me a follow @ThyBorg_ ✌️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#Prop69 isn’t a scam or a spam, & people are voting “No w/ Veto '' just to get $GNOT. Thing is, these wallets are essentially forever tagging themselves as “airdrop chasers''. As Cosmos grows, it wouldn't surprise me if other projects use that vote to exclude the chasers
I appreciate the fact that some people actually wish to convey the strongest opposition possible. However in blockchain voting "No w/ Veto" traditionally means the proposal is a scam and the proposer should loose the deposit
Also projects are free to incentivize voting however they want, and people are free to try to maximise their airdrop. I wrote a thread about doing that with #Gnoland here
Yesterday Cosmos founder @jaekwon published a lengthy article explaining his opposition to Cosmos governance proposal 69 and the details of the upcoming #Gnoland airdrop for $ATOM holders, which I've summarised as a Q&A below 🧵
I've explained Jae's and the minimalist hub philosophy in this previous thread. Note that this is not an endorsement of the "No" vote as I personally haven't made my mind yet
I've worked out the revenue of #Cosmos validators: the average on the Cosmos Hub is around $45,000 per month at current prices, and $100,000 at all-time. These averages come with a huge variance so let's break it down 🧵
First it's important to note that I'm only talking about revenues, not profits. In order to work out the profit, we would need to figure out the costs, and I'll focus on that in a separate thread
Second, I'm only talking about Cosmos Hub validators here. Since most validators operate on several blockchains (e.g #Osmosis, #Juno etc.) their total revenues are much higher. I'll share the results for other blockchains in a separate thread
Two of the top four smart contract platforms were down this week-end. The other two are built with Tendermint and the Cosmos SDK. That's because Cosmos is ... 👇
The price of $ATOM has taken a beating over the past couple of weeks, possibly because it somewhat lacks a clear utility. Let's see why the implementation of a Hub model is likely to change that for forever 🧵
First let's remind everyone that the value of $ATOM is not just represented by the price of the coin. In fact most of it's value so far has been in the form of generous airdrops distributed to stakers by the projects building on Cosmos
And right now, all of these chains participating in IBC must implement each other’s light clients. So with N blockchains, you need N * (N-1) implementations.
The Cosmos "alpha" from last week in one convenient thread. That's the rumours or news that have the potential to move the markets in the short to medium term (and for which clever investors might want to position themselves early) 🧵
The founder of a Polkadot-based parachain expects to complete an IBC integration this year