Karen Vaites Profile picture
May 4 9 tweets 4 min read
Biggest issue with Science of Reading movement:

Many leaders are white women who predominantly talk about issues that affect dyslexic children. White/provileged kids are more likely to be ID’d as dyslexic.

There is much less attention to issues affecting less privileged kids.
To understand that issue, about the weak screening of Black children for reading issues, the first few pieces in this thread are excellent.
I would once again like to remind everyone that the movement to bring knowledge-building curriculum to all schools is an equity movement.

I explained it in this blog.

We need the SOR movement to talk more about this.

eduvaites.org/2018/11/14/ess… Image
I would once again like to remind everyone that leveled reading groups are tracking in elementary school.

Which means they are classist & racist.

My friends in the SOR movement, you know we get the least talk about this part of the problem:

eduvaites.org/2019/11/02/lev…
It doesn’t help that @EdWriters overfocus on the phonics conversation, and often completely neglect the other issues above.

I appreciated @mgpotente’s naming of that issue yesterday.
Y’all know I want daily, systematic phonics in early grades.

But we need more voices talking about the other issues.

The over-focus on phonics in the discourse has a lot of issues, as I explained in yesterday’s thread.

👉 First & foremost, it’s giving us “phonics patching”.
I’m on record:

The SOR movement will fail if it only addresses one part of the problem with reading instruction in America.

I am grateful to the #CurriculumMatters movement for its relative balance.
Are you a part of the problem?

Check yourself.

You can search your own profile and see how often you post about phonics vs comprehension or leveled reading groups.

I think we all know which orgs and leaders would fail the test of talking about all of the key reading issues. Image
The good news: there is an easy solution! Here are 3 articles you can tweet if you are guilty of talking predominantly about phonics, to exclusion of other issues.

We can all right the imbalance in the discourse.

And given the media issue, we need to.

TY for your help.🙏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Karen Vaites

Karen Vaites Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @karenvaites

May 6
The NYC Health Commissioner is standing by a Prom Ban for unvaccinated kids.

Which is just politics in action, and deeply sad for all the (low-risk!!!) kids who deserve normal social lives again.

After all they’ve been through. 💔

Why, @NYCHealthCommr??
As usual, we will see no media coverage of this issue now…

But wait for it
Read 4 tweets
May 6
If I had a dollar for every time I have heard this...
It isn’t just because we don’t always get straight info from the media.

Sure, this is an issue…

< cough cough >
But also BC the media covers education like a political topic (“The latest school board meeting roundup…”; “outrage about book banning in one school district 1,000 miles away from you”)…

And what parents want is practical info on how they can support their kids. 🤷‍♀️

At home…
Read 5 tweets
May 5
Now It Can Be Said, School Closure Edition:

@DLeonhardt explains that school closures were an unnecessary COVID policy.

Harmful and regressive, too.

nytimes.com/2022/05/05/bri…
.@DLeonhardt says it softly, but he does say it.

School closures were avoidable.

👇👇👇 ImageImage
Here’s where things get dicey.

@DLeonhardt points to @ProfEmilyOster’s work as Exhibit A for why we should have known better. It was.

@nytimes didn’t feature her work until 8.5 months after it debuted!!!

And even then, @DanaGoldstein Both-Sides’d it.

nytimes.com/2021/06/22/us/… ImageImage
Read 15 tweets
May 2
“A widely used… intervention for struggling beginning readers may hurt students’ reading growth in the long run, a new study finds.”

It’s also *incredibly* expensive, in the $10K per child range in many districts.

Important reporting by @SarahDSparks:

edweek.org/teaching-learn…
“I think the big takeaway here is that the estimated long-term effects [of Reading Recovery] are negative, significant, and meaningfully large.”

This is talking is one of the most widely-touted reading intervention programs in K–12, y’all.
I wish @SarahDSparks had been more explicit about the connection between RR and typically concerns about Balanced Literacy: it coaches kids to guess words rather than learn to decode them.

From @missypurcell1’s child’s RR teacher in @GwinnettSchools:

facebook.com/1313023329/pos…
Read 5 tweets
May 2
“This graph exists and Americans don’t riot”
To the folks replying and saying that the issue is Americans (their behaviors, their growing obesity)…

I’d suggest that there are other factors at play.

This is something:
This 2009 piece by David Goldhill was an excellent overview of our shocking & swiftly-increasing healthcare expenditures, with no better health outcomes to show for it. I remember being struck by it.

Has anything comparable been written in last few yrs?

theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
Read 4 tweets
May 1
These two tweets came through my feed in rapid succession.

The first is from a well-followed teacher influencer.

We probably don’t talk enough about the face that #edtech has served primarily as a distraction in schools, not an accelerant of good instruction.
This is one of my favorite reads on the topic, but it’s now behind a pay wall.

@natwexler, is it available on your substack?

technologyreview.com/2019/12/19/131…
In the meantime, you can read this, from @edukings. It’s mostly about literacy, but it’s a reminder that Ed tech gobbles up district budgets. Generally with low payback.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(