zara ♀🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture
May 4, 2022 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
That a woman’s uterus is a political playground, a space that can be controlled and legislated by the state, that people think it’s ok to force women to give birth, to rob her of HER decision, this is some of the grimmest proof of the patriarchal dehumanisation of women.
We argue with anti choicers, try to convince them of something so simple: what’s in my body, regardless of how it got there, is my business, and no one else’s. What I do with that is my prerogative and my right.
But then it hits me how insane it is that this even needs to be said. That the DEBATE about whether the state can control our intimate space, our private lives, our futures, is taken as standard. That women’s lives are UP FOR DEBATE. That is the worst part.
So many men have opinions on whether women should be “allowed” control over their own bodies. So many women approach this debate as an acceptable one where our bodies can and should be legislated, but just “how much” is the question.
No. That there is even a debate AT ALL is misogyny.

We say this often, and it is worth repeating again and again and again: if men were the ones who got pregnant, abortion wouldn’t be a debate. It would be a given. It would be a simple healthcare procedure.
It is so clear that for too many, a foetus is given more humanity than the woman who carries it. More empathy, consideration. More *life* than the living, breathing woman whose own fate hangs in the balance.
Our bodies are patriarchy’s playground, our humanity an inconvenience.
Abortion isn’t a complex debate. It’s a very very simple one. Does a woman get to dictate what happens to her body at any point in time regardless of YOUR feelings on the matter? If no, you dehumanise her. It is that simple. End of.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with zara ♀🏳️‍🌈

zara ♀🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cache_pas

Aug 19, 2023
In all of this what’s actually lost is the segment itself, in which @KafleShristi, a campaigner in Nepal and host of a Nepalese podcast Period Talk, discussed the tragic phenomenon of period huts which led to the death of a 16 year old girl. An extreme case of woman hating.🧵
The huts are usually made of mud and straw. The 16 year old girl died of a snake bite a week ago, while she was sleeping in the hut. Her body was found Wednesday morning. The local authorities confirmed it was because of the practice of chhaupaddi, aka period huts.
This isn’t the first incident.

Why does it happen? In 2017, the govt criminalised the practice, but the punishment was only a three month jail sentence and a fine of less than 30 euros.

Campaigners and authorities destroyed the huts, but people rebuilt them in different forms.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 16, 2023
To all the GCs in the replies to this tweet, making the tragic death of a 16 year old girl in Nepal, about THEIR single issue: with all my heart, go fuck yourselves.
No, I don’t want to argue with you about “if we don’t have the word woman we have nothing.” Get to fuck. You are selfish if you cannot see how inappropriate this is.
A girl has died due to absolutely NOTHING to do with trans issues, and you’re using that tragedy to make a point about your single issue brainrot.

BEYOND inappropriate.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 5, 2023
Someone just asked me an amazing question, so I’m turning it into a thread. “What do you think we should do to combat gender ideology if ‘GCism is dead’?”

This is an important question, and if you *actually* care about the issue, this’ll be, hopefully, a thought provoking read.
In all this anger about the left’s genderism, it seems to have been forgotten that the left’s genderism is the other side of the coin of the right’s genderism. You can’t have LW gender, aka “a boy wearing clips might be a girl,” WITHOUT RW gender.
By right wing gender, of course, I mean traditional gender roles. Words mean things, and the right wing is socially conservative which means they value tradition and are slow to change and stick to traditional gender roles.
Read 16 tweets
Aug 4, 2023
GCism is dead, and I’ll tell you why.

It started with this comment.

3,700 likes so far, too many of whom WERE mutuals, for a woman saying a dysphoric person showing mastectomy scars is “pathetic and self absorbed.”

Read the thread before you fling insults at me, btw. Image
GCs claim to care about young women getting double mastectomies and identifying out of misogyny, etc. When it’s convenient, the rhetoric is, they’re poor victims of this ideology. SAVE THE GIRLS!
Young lesbians identifying as men are the excuse used for much of the outrage I see on here.

Look at the rates of transition at the Tavistock for teenage girls. They’ve increased thousands of percentage points. That’s significant.

That’s true…and yet…
Read 25 tweets
Jul 18, 2023
“Birth certificates should only have the biological mother and father on them” shut up. Genuinely shut up. Actually shut up and learn, read, think.

Read this and then tell me “birth certificates should only have the mum and dad on them.” Fucking Christ, you malicious people. Image
Anyone who is stuck on birth certificates only showing biological parents is, at this point, running interference for RANK AND FUCKING OBVIOUS HOMOPHOBIA. Image
“Birth certificates should be factual” get your head out of La La land baby pretend world and read reality, where birth certificates have real world implications, regardless of what you *want* them to be. Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 28, 2023
I live in an authoritarian, patriarchal theocracy. The other day, my sister and I went to the supermarket. It wasn’t long before we realised we were being followed. He—isn’t it always a he?—wandered through the aisles, holding nothing, not shopping, openly staring at us.
We finished our shopping while trying to dodge him. He continued to stare at us. When we got to the register, he lined up some ways behind us, with just a canned drink.
When we had paid, we stood by the security guards at the front of the supermarket, waiting for him to pay and leave.

He paid, stood by the lifts, and waited for us, staring at us the whole time.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(