Starts with the basics, who funds them?
Usual suspects- Soros, Ford, Omdiyar etc.
No, it doesn't stop here.
Read on.. because its very imp. 1/
First of all, no-one care about these foreign paid-out indexing, but then many within our country use these reports to malign every aspect of country. That's why its important to burst their agenda with facts and logic.
2/
RSF is a bunch of USA and Eupore-funded bunch of journo/editors/media etc who are "watchdog" of freedom of press.
However, RSF has always been under heavy criticism for its biased & agenda-driven methodology. e.g.
here it is Hungary accused RSF for "interfering". 3/
India's Niti Ayog also criticised RSF's report last year and so Singapore PM rejected them as a "subjective measure through the prism of western liberals. And they shouldn't be? 4/
RSF uses the absolutely crazy method. So its hand-picked NGOs and selected media ppl by RSF only to participate in 123 qu survey!
And sample size? 150 journos & 18 NGOs 123 qu for each country. Obviously, its far away from ground realities. But that's the agenda. 5/
As per RSF, "confrontation between “blocs” is growing in nationalist Narendra Modi’s India".
e.g. 15% (9 out of 61) of total world’s journalists are imprisoned in India only.
Ok, let's look into the profile and cases by case these "journalists"! 6/
Here its list of 15 cases that RSF cited for poor "freedom of press".
6 cases are J&K "journos", all with serious charges of trr links, funding, supplying arms, objectionable material, inciting public, disaffection to own country, waging war, all cases by NIA 7/
3 cases are UP exam board paper leaks. Can you believe this? What's the connection with their "journalism" here?
2 cases are urban Naxal Elgar Parishad & Bhima Koregaon rioting case (UAPA).
1 case for inciting violence, links with PFI.
8/
Now 4 cases are from Chattisgarh- 2/4 for writing against INC MLA 1/4 for writing satire against INC state govt 1/4 extortion racket
At least 3/4 case here actually look at an attack on freedom of the press by the INC govt in Chattisgarh.
9/
Dont scroll down without reading
details in pics in tweets #7 & 8, be an honest reader :P else you are likely to miss the fun.
As a dessert, here it is another report by The Street with funds breakup and bogus methodology!
10/
Personal opinion-
Now, this analysis done to expose the RSF "credibility", no-where I intend to defend the journalism in India. Indexing by not any third party but the reader/viewers themselves. How would you rate the "freedom of press" in India?
11/
If the "freedom" rating be bad - it should be for the intended harassment of one editor-in-chief by the "best" state govt or for a female journo who had to leave a "west" state for covering fascist govt and the list is long.
12/
If the "freedom" rating be good - it should be for allowing ranting 24x7 biased news, mindless debates, crazy titles, intruding in personal lives, misleading thumbnails, fake news, agenda-driven narratives & all without any consequences!
How much freedom do you want then?
13/
And then why shouldn't you support the war against disinformation war by 'The Hawk Eye' because mainstream won't bring this up 😎
So, support the efforts & be an eye of Hawk-Eye: 🧐
₹ 35,30,346 Cr (35 lakh crore): The commutative amount has been transferred directly to the valid beneficiary account (DBT).
Had it been the Congress era, 85% i.e. ₹30 lakh crore would have vanished to corrupt mediators.
1/
₹30L Cr is an estimated loss based on former PM Rajiv Gandhi's infamous quote. In other words, this is ~60% of India's today's budget. Imagine the level of corruption, that even the PM confessed, unofficial commission, fake ID beneficiaries, duplicities & other means.
2/
Though DBT was initiated in 2013 (parting MMS govt), it was systematically expanded by the Modi govt.
For the success of DBT, first & foremost need is a bank a/c. Govt launched the massive PM Jan Dhan Yojana, under which 52cr a/c were opened (56% women & 67% in rural/suburb) 3/
I can float a party and can promise a plot on moon for everyone. Interestingly, I don't have to explain my technical or economical plan, neither I would have any fear of consequences if I (obviously) won't be able to do it.
1/
In the high octane election in India, ppl hardly care about manifestos & so the parties. Nonetheless it is best reflection of intent & vision of the party.
Problem is almost no constitutional compulsion or scrutiny of promises being even technically feasible.
2/
First of all the word "guarantee" is highly misleading. I'd personally go with Kapil Sibal who said using this word itself is unconstitutional. No one can guarantee anything but only can try. BJP, Congress or AAP, all parties failed here.
3/
The other day I went to a party wearing my favourite Wildstone deo. My host (name withheld) introduced me to someone. The rest is history.
1/
This morning I was feeling a little dull. Then I brushed my teeth with Colgate Max and blew my breath at a random girl. In general, you would have got a slap in such a case, but here that girl started dancing with me.
2/
And here if you are born with an average look and dark skin, you just need to apply fair and lovely and handsome, which will change your look & skin colour good enough to be acceptable in society.
@DrSJaishankar referred Nehru's foreign policy (India second, China first). Congress spox @LavanyaBallal used derogatory remarks and denying the charges.
Here are two historical evidences that India was indeed offered permanent seat for UNSC but Nehru denied.
1/
The 1950 American Offer:
US: we offer unseating of China as a Permanent Member in the Security Council and of India being put in her place.
JLN: We shall go on pressing for China's admission in the UNSC. India is certainly entitled, but not at cost of China.
2/
The 1955 Soviet Offer:
USSR: we propose India's inclusion as the 6th member of the UNSC.
JLN: We feel that this should not be done till the question of China's admission is first solved. I feel that we should first concentrate on getting China admitted.
Supreme court & petitioner and that journalist (which I still believe is just a front face) has royally screwed up the Electoral Bond scheme and its' purpose.
Let me explain, how -
1/
Quid-Pro-Quo: Think for a moment, if center govt wanted to use it for kickbacks, bribes and commissions which payment mode would have been better? Cash or EB!
2/
Agencies as weapons: If the central ruling party has received 6K Cr for Q-P-Q, opposition parties have also received 16K Cr. Why would corporate bet on them if they know oppsn doesn't control CBI/ED?
3/