Yesterday we closed the class and stopped taking freshman applications for fall. That's unusual at OSU, as we've typically stayed open most or all of the summer.
So, the summer is relaxation time, right?
No, for lots of reasons. First, you made a decision. Was it the right one? Or do a lot more students have double or triple deposits than usual? What's melt going to be like? Is our post-COVID admission world going to behave differently than pre-COVID?
Are we even post-COVID?
After watching deposits for four months, you now start to look at Orientation registrations, and housing contracts. And email click rates. You know some percentage of students will sign up at the last minute for the last event, but what percentage will it be this year?
And, of course, transfers. We are a long way from done with transfers, and in case you hadn't noticed, enrollment at community colleges continues to fall.
We're watching pipelines for that enrollment segment continue to shrink.
By the way, while you were all sleeping, we started recruiting for the classes of 2023 and 2024.
Last January.
And we're in a good position. There have been lots of years when I had to worry about all those other things while I still worried about next fall's freshman class.
Many colleagues are in that situation right now.
One of the greatest injustices in higher education is that the freshman class is such a defining element of an institution's identity.
We think of Chicago and Princeton and Michigan as thriving research universities.
The public sees their rejection rate and SAT scores.
No one on the elevator ever asks me how retention looks, or how much aid we've spent to make this class. The small talk of enrollment is always about the freshman class, even at Oregon's largest four-year university with the most research dollars.
And, as my mother used to say, "if everyone went into a room and threw their troubles onto a big pile, when it came time to redistribute them, you'd probably take your own back."
I'm one of the lucky ones in that regard. There are problems, and then there are problems.
So, no, we don't take the summer off. And no, we don't stop worrying.
It's the way our business, and probably, our minds, work.
So when you get on the elevator today with your EM professional, ask them about anything, except how enrollment is looking (note: this does not apply to the provost or president).
Thread: I don't think Sal Khan is a bad guy. But this article is full of College Board propaganda, as you might expect from someone who is indebted to the College Board. thejournal.com/Articles/2022/…
I will leave the #HateRead to @akilbello but let me just point out one thing in a quote from the article, and a piece of reality:
The tendency of tossing out made-up crap and expecting to get away with it is where we are. It didn't start in 2015 and 2016, that that's when it solidified.
This week a counselor contacted me and asked what percentage of freshman deposits came in very near the deadline, and whether there was any data on this phenomenon.
She had a parent who was worried because a child had not yet deposited.
So, as I often have to tell people,"no there is no data published on this little narrow but interesting question, sorry." But then I talked about my experience: Depending on the place I've worked, you might get 25% of your freshman deposits in the week leading up to May 1 (or 2)
If you are heavy in ED like some highly rejectives, you might get 60% in January, so you might get 25% of the 40% that last week. Even that 10% is a lot.
And it's also important to remember that 90% of US colleges and universities take apps past May 1 (or 2) each year.
Thread: I tweeted about this yesterday (sort of sardonically), but of course this is picking up some steam now, as you knew it would.
First, students have always included destination in their list of things that are important. I remember a counselor in Florida in the 80's telling me that "Boston had become hot" for her students.
It's always in the top three among student motivators.
And while I hate to criticize journalists who talk to six people and make it a "trend" (because the people they talked to volunteered after seeing a question on a list serve asking if they'd noticed this), it's still worrisome.
Thread: Be watching for articles and opinion pieces with the new narrative that "The SAT helps poor students." They're starting to pop up like flowers in the spring.
Why? Here's my take on it:
First, spend three minutes on this video. It's about what College Board did when the UC system tried to eliminate tests the first time, in the early part of this century. It is well worth your time. It's from @thetestdoc
The College Board is a business. It's now lost the UC and Cal State systems for real, and it's holding on by its fingernails. It has to find some way to maintain market share and pay the rent on its New York City office.
They're calling in chips from their true believers.
"Everything like letters of recommendation and essays and GPA can be easily manipulated by the wealthy, so we need The SAT because it's standardized and fair."
I have this strange belief that if we who have actually done admissions keep beating our heads against a brick wall, somehow this thinking will go away.
It won't because you have people with a voice--the same ones who benefit from the SAT--controlling the narrative.
So first, the rebuttal: Yes, as I've said before, almost everything in the process favors the wealthy. That's the defining problem.