“How to Sabotage your Russian Tank 101.” Dear Russian Soldiers, We understand some of you are sabotaging your tanks which means others may want to and do not know the best way. Here are some basic tips for how to render the T72 inoperable: 2/
1. Pour a lot of dirt, sand, or sugar into the fuel tanks to clog the lines. 2. Drain the oil in either the engine or transmission, and it will eventually burnout either system. 3. Since the T72 runs on a “Christie” track/suspension, it’s easier to sabotage the road wheels... 3/
...just by not greasing them…they’ll eventually lock up. If you take off the grease fittings, or pump water into the fittings, they’ll also freeze up and the tank will eventually throw the track. 4. You can also do the same thing to the road wheel arms that attach the wheels. 4/
5. Loosen the lug nuts on each of the road wheels. Loosening – or taking a few off - will cause the road wheels to eventually roll off after several miles. That will also likely cause the track to come off and deaden your tank. 5/
6. Another way to sabotage your tank: bury it. The T72 only has 48 cm (19 inches) of ground clearance, so driving it into a mud bog or river will make it hard to get out.
If you really want to get serious, you can
sabotage the fire control system. Here’s a few techniques: 6/
7. You can find a way to jam the autoloader, or destroy the tank by using the powder cannister for the round. The rounds are placed in the autoloader as two distinct parts (the “bullet,”or round, and the powder cartridge) and are linked together in the cassette so they can...7/
...be loaded into the cannon. When the “cartridge” is separated from the round, you can slice that cartridge, and it will spill the powder and when lit will cause a powder fire. That will cause a fire in the turret, which will explode other rounds in the autoloader. 8/
8. Finally, stuff a a bunch of mud in the end of the gun tube from the outside, then fire a round. That will cause the tube to “banana peel” and will make the tank inoperable.
These final 2 methods could cause you injury, so while effective take care when you execute them. 9/
A final recommendation: Put a white flag on the turret, turn the gun tube to the rear and point it skyward, and drive toward Ukrainian lines. That’s the universal sign among tankers to surrender...10/
If you heed this advice you are likely to save your own lives and the lives of innocent Ukrainians and it’s the right thing to do. Don’t be on the wrong side of history.
Sincerely, Captain Scott Kelly & Lieutenant General Mark Hertling 11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Having done a fair share of targeting of enemy forces during my career, I'm a bit baffled about the amount of coverage of the intelligence sharing that is going on between the US and Ukraine.
Here's why. Another 🧵 1/12
When conducting "targeting," there are three important elements to consider:
1). The collection of important intelligence
2). The "boarding" of the target (how to hit, where to hit, when to hit, defenses, etc.)
3). The enemy's ability to avoid being hit. 2/
Collection of intelligence comes in many ways:
-Overhead satellite imagery
-Collection of electronic signals
-Collection of human intelligence information
-"Patterns of life/movement"
-Enemy ability to defend itself
Many countries do intel collection & the US is great at it. 3/
I hesitated to comment on this @washingtonpost article, because I thought their use of "jack-in-the-box" description was inappropriate. But dozens of people have DM'd me asking "what do you think of this?"
A few weeks ago, as the "new phase" was being discussed, I suggested we should look for a couple things happening in the east and south of Ukraine.
We're very early in that new phase & there are indicators those things are happening.
Let's review what we should see. 1/12
First, let's talk the Russian army (RU from here out).
RU has attempted to regenerate the forces mauled in the 1st phase. If they follow their doctrine, regeneration usually means new personnel, repair/exchange of equipment, resupply, rest & likely a lot of new leaders.
2/
Given the time & desire of Putin to have a May victory, it's likely little of that happened.
RU likely has either low-strength units, several units consolidated into one, or units poorly manned.
Reports indicate 2-man tank crews (3 needed) & BMP w/ few infantry in back. 3/
A few folks suggested I've been "bold" in some of my predictions accompanying the analysis I've provided on @CNN regarding this conflict.
Beyond tactical assessments, there are 2 primary reasons I've said Ukraine would win this fight.
Here's a short 🧵 on why I say this. 1/17
Reason 1:
Conventional joint & combined arms operations are hard. Real hard. Exceedingly hard.
Coordinating actions of tanks, infantry, artillery, engineers, air defense, air support, naval opns, amphibious landings, special opns & logistics support is tough. 2/
Doing so takes intense training of individuals in their specific skills, exercises that build the capabilities of interprofessional teams who pull theose skills together, the understanding of complex equipment & doctrine, communicating intent...and great leadership. 3/
In India, Boris Johnson was asked if RU "could win the war" in UKR.
He answered "look, it is a realistic possibility."
One must consider the "context" of the remark before judging...but...
In my view, Putin has already lost, strategically.
Here's why. 1/4
-Putin is now seen as a war criminal, a global pariah. He will never stand on a world stage again.
-RU Army has proven to be inept & have repeatedly violated the law of land warfare.
-RU did not achieved any original war aims/strategic objectives
-RU economy is in tatters.
2/4
-The people of UKR will NEVER be subjugated...and UKR will NEVER be successfully occupied.
-UKR's govt has emerged as a modern nation-state & will be a future key leader in Europe.
-@NATO is united & will become even stronger
-The US has reemerged as a world leader 3/4