Yishan Profile picture
May 6 12 tweets 2 min read
Two weeks ago, the NY Times asked to interview me regarding Elon and free speech, saying (among other things) that she believed that thus far, no one has been able to succinctly and convincingly offer a strong counter point to Elon's position for society to consider.
I was pretty busy at the time and so couldn't do a zoom interview and agreed to do it over email, but that I would first send her my argument against Elon's owning Twitter, and if it was something the NYT was willing to publish unedited, then I could do the interview.
This is what I sent her:
"Here is my best argument (which I think works for people on left and right) against Elon's ownership of Twitter:
Were Elon to take over Twitter, it would result in the private ownership of yet another major and influential media outlet by a member of the 1%. But why would that be bad?
The best example of how this is harmful to America is the New York Times, owned and controlled by multi-millionaire Arthur G. Sulzberger Jr., the fifth-generation male heir of his family to own and control the paper.
The Times is decried across the political spectrum for selectively publishing news and opinions supporting (depending on who you're asking) a neo-liberal, white supremacist, and/or patriarchal status quo.
It gives little space to views that would threaten the entrenched system enabling such dynastic control of one of America's leading newspapers, a control wielded for over a century exclusively by eldest sons of the same wealthy family.
It certainly never hosts content substantively critical of itself or its ownership, a fact that cannot be said of Twitter.
So, if one considers such control of a leading media institution like the New York Times to be healthy for society, then it's probably fine for Elon Musk and his heirs (of five generations hence) to own Twitter.
His altruistic contributions to enabling leaps in sustainable transport and space exploration likely indicate that he is as noble and trustworthy a man as the publisher of the New York Times."
We didn't end up doing the interview.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yishan

Yishan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @yishan

May 7
The NYT reporter (and friends) have taken to claiming that I have misrepresented them:

Of course, that's up to interpretation, because I specifically did not outline or speculate what their motives were.

Nevertheless, what's great about Twitter is that when they feel like they've been misrepresented by some imagined implication that they have the ability to make their case on the same platform where they feel the misrepresentation occurred.
Read 61 tweets
Apr 27
Okay, now I'm being asked "What should Elon do to fix Twitter?"

It looks like the takeover succeeded (easiest hostile takeover ever! I suspect the board secretly wanted to work with Elon, because WELL IT'S ELON).
I don't know what it means to "fix" Twitter, but here are a few more detailed perspectives which may shed light on more effective solutions (rather than solutions which backfire).
The first key perspective is that most people who are users only look at social platforms from one lens, namely:

1: what can people say?
Read 168 tweets
Apr 16
This part of my recent tweetstorm is one of the most misunderstood, so I would like to clarify it.

My usage of "by scientists" was taken to mean that acceptable discourse should only happen if the participants are (qualified/experts/etc), but that's not what I was after at all.
A better way of putting this is "if it were being discussed in a calm, polite manner on Twitter."

It's the behavior that matters, not the content or the participants.
At the time, there were many people quite reasonably discussing the lab leak theory (scientists and laymen), but there were ALSO people who were looking at the discussion and concluding things like "China released this on purpose" and "I should go and attack random Asians."
Read 59 tweets
Apr 15
I've now been asked multiple times for my take on Elon's offer for Twitter.

So fine, this is what I think about that. I will assume the takeover succeeds, and he takes Twitter private. (I have little knowledge/insight into how actual takeover battles work or play out)

(long 🧵)
I think if Elon takes over Twitter, he is in for a world of pain. He has no idea.
There is this old culture of the internet, roughly Web 1.0 (late 90s) and early Web 2.0, pre-Facebook (pre-2005), that had a very strong free speech culture.
Read 88 tweets
Mar 18
Unpopular opinion: I believe the best place to encounter extraterrestrial aliens is at live Broadway shows.

Here's why: 🧵
First, I refer you to this graph:
The universe is mostly hydrogen, with some helium.

You can MAKE every other element using hydrogen and helium, and both of those things are pretty much everywhere.
Read 15 tweets
Mar 3
Wordle 257 3/6

🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

These victories are kind of hollow now that my wife is consistently solving the Semantle almost every day.
She has figured out a way to extract information from the cold guesses to form multiple vectors in the 300-dimensional space so that she can hone in on the answer far more quickly.
She is also learning multiple languages simultaneously on Duolingo.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(