Two weeks ago, the NY Times asked to interview me regarding Elon and free speech, saying (among other things) that she believed that thus far, no one has been able to succinctly and convincingly offer a strong counter point to Elon's position for society to consider.
I was pretty busy at the time and so couldn't do a zoom interview and agreed to do it over email, but that I would first send her my argument against Elon's owning Twitter, and if it was something the NYT was willing to publish unedited, then I could do the interview.
This is what I sent her:
"Here is my best argument (which I think works for people on left and right) against Elon's ownership of Twitter:
Were Elon to take over Twitter, it would result in the private ownership of yet another major and influential media outlet by a member of the 1%. But why would that be bad?
The best example of how this is harmful to America is the New York Times, owned and controlled by multi-millionaire Arthur G. Sulzberger Jr., the fifth-generation male heir of his family to own and control the paper.
The Times is decried across the political spectrum for selectively publishing news and opinions supporting (depending on who you're asking) a neo-liberal, white supremacist, and/or patriarchal status quo.
It gives little space to views that would threaten the entrenched system enabling such dynastic control of one of America's leading newspapers, a control wielded for over a century exclusively by eldest sons of the same wealthy family.
It certainly never hosts content substantively critical of itself or its ownership, a fact that cannot be said of Twitter.
So, if one considers such control of a leading media institution like the New York Times to be healthy for society, then it's probably fine for Elon Musk and his heirs (of five generations hence) to own Twitter.
His altruistic contributions to enabling leaps in sustainable transport and space exploration likely indicate that he is as noble and trustworthy a man as the publisher of the New York Times."
We didn't end up doing the interview.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nevertheless, what's great about Twitter is that when they feel like they've been misrepresented by some imagined implication that they have the ability to make their case on the same platform where they feel the misrepresentation occurred.
Okay, now I'm being asked "What should Elon do to fix Twitter?"
It looks like the takeover succeeded (easiest hostile takeover ever! I suspect the board secretly wanted to work with Elon, because WELL IT'S ELON).
I don't know what it means to "fix" Twitter, but here are a few more detailed perspectives which may shed light on more effective solutions (rather than solutions which backfire).
The first key perspective is that most people who are users only look at social platforms from one lens, namely:
This part of my recent tweetstorm is one of the most misunderstood, so I would like to clarify it.
My usage of "by scientists" was taken to mean that acceptable discourse should only happen if the participants are (qualified/experts/etc), but that's not what I was after at all.
A better way of putting this is "if it were being discussed in a calm, polite manner on Twitter."
It's the behavior that matters, not the content or the participants.
At the time, there were many people quite reasonably discussing the lab leak theory (scientists and laymen), but there were ALSO people who were looking at the discussion and concluding things like "China released this on purpose" and "I should go and attack random Asians."
I've now been asked multiple times for my take on Elon's offer for Twitter.
So fine, this is what I think about that. I will assume the takeover succeeds, and he takes Twitter private. (I have little knowledge/insight into how actual takeover battles work or play out)
(long 🧵)
I think if Elon takes over Twitter, he is in for a world of pain. He has no idea.
There is this old culture of the internet, roughly Web 1.0 (late 90s) and early Web 2.0, pre-Facebook (pre-2005), that had a very strong free speech culture.
She has figured out a way to extract information from the cold guesses to form multiple vectors in the 300-dimensional space so that she can hone in on the answer far more quickly.
She is also learning multiple languages simultaneously on Duolingo.