#Thread: On WHO Covid excess death projections and the Union government's dubious arguments against it.
A recently released WHO report has concluded that India's Covid-19 death count is nearly 10 times the official toll. The government has tried to discredit the data -- saying the new estimates “may stretch to the limits of absurdity.”
The government, and some media outlets, have said the data on deaths registered with the Central Registration System (CRS) proves that WHO's projections are way out of line.
Is it? The government is selling us a lemon, I contend. It's doing so by contradicting its own stance on how the CRS maps and collects death-related data from villages and towns into a centralised digital database.
Deaths are first recorded in registers at the municipality and gram panchayat level. Sometimes digitally. And often at gram panchayats in manually filled registers.
From the original death registers, it takes time for the data to be fed up the chain in the central registry that the govt is now using as its defence.

It takes nearly two years before the data is collated nationwide and put out in reports like the one released earlier this week
In fact, the Centre has used this lag as an excuse to criticise any independent analysis of mortality data during the pandemic.

Example: pib.gov.in/PressReleasePa…

We @reporters_co decided to go to the primary source of the information - the original death registers.
.@tapasya_umm, @nit_set & I spent over 3 months parsing through death registers gathered from 68 of Gujarat's 170 municipalities -- where deaths are first recorded. We collected copies of hand-filled registers between January 2019 and April 2021, running into thousands of pages.
Here's what we found:In the 68 municipalities -- 6% of Gujarat's population -- 16,892 more people died from all causes between March 2020 and April 2021 compared to the same period in 2019. The official death toll for the state stood at 10,075 when we published our report.
An estimate of how devastating the second wave was: In April 2021 alone, there were 10,238 excess deaths in the 6% of population under review, which is more than the official statewide COVID-19 death tally for the entire pandemic.
In Surendranagar, a district with 17,56,268 people, the official Covid death toll of the entire district stood at 136. But death registers show that in one municipality, which holds 14% of the district’s population, there were 1,210 excess deaths between March and April 2021.
I could go on and on, one municipality after other. One district to another. We have now mapped more than 100 municipalities of Gujarat and more than 70 districts across the country for excess death data (not projections, but absolute data).
We corroborated some of this data with ground reporting, too. We collected data from crematoriums and kabristaans and matched that data with the corresponding municipality's official death registers.
Now, lets look at the government's attempts at discrediting WHO's estimates and how some media outlets toed a similar line.
Coinciding with the WHO report, govt put out its own CRS (Civil Registration System) report for 2020. The CRS report is a compilation of births and deaths registered in the country in a year.

Keyword: 'Registered'. The CRS report is not a count of the actual deaths.
One of the key features of CRS reports is level of registration of deaths in the country. This gives you the number of deaths registered for every 100 that actually died. The 2020 CRS report is missing this crucial info. Here's the level of registration seen in 2019:
The data on level of registration helps you get to the 'estimated deaths' figure. Since the 2020 CRS report has skipped level of death registration, it has no estimated death count.

Interestingly, the government has claimed that death registration in 2020 stood at 99.9%.
This figure is from the PIB press release. NOT the official CRS report. When @ThePrintIndia reached out to officials to ask them about the missing level of death registration data, the unnamed sources said the 99.9% figure was "internally shared" in the Health Ministry
The CRS report itself, meanwhile raises questions about the true extent of under reporting of deaths. At least two states, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh, blamed pandemic-related disruptions for not being able to capture death figures accurately.
In the absence of level of death registration data, it's not possible to arrive at an estimated count of how many Indians actually died. As this level drops -- meaning the number of dead whose deaths were registered is low -- the estimated death count rises.
Some media outlets, picking up arguments first put forth by govt officials, have also got it wrong. For example...
The Indian Express questioning WHO estimates quotes the 99.9% figure mentioned in govt PR (not the official report) and uses the estimated death count based on this claim to analyse trends.
It says that since WHO estimated 8.3 lakh Covid deaths in 2020, there would be only 73 lakh non-Covid deaths. It then says India's annual death count since 2007 has never been below 80 lakh. This apparently makes the 8.3 lakh Covid death estimates for 2020 implausible.
This analysis, just to remind you, is based on a government claim. A claim even it did not feel confident enough about to include in its official report. Put it out in a press release instead.
You can read our Gujarat Covid death data story here:
thewire.in/health/gujarat…
@tapasya_umm, @harshithamanwan and @journomayank also analysed the excess deaths in three other Indian states: Rajasthan, Jharkhand and Andhra Pradesh

science.thewire.in/health/covid-r…
This took time and a lot of effort. But got us a little closer to truth.

If you feel reportage of this kind has any value, consider supporting the @reporters_co

reporters-collective.in/support-us

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shreegireesh Jalihal

Shreegireesh Jalihal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shreegireesh

Apr 27
How tonnes of pulses meant for India's poor and armed forces were siphoned off for profits of a few.

A story that involves rigged auctions, bad quality food, state apathy and, of course, a healthy dose of corruption.

A thread:
Govts when supplying pulses to citizens under schemes like Mid Day Meals or PMGKAY need to first pick millers to process the raw pulses.

There's a simple way to do this: Select the miller who'll charge you the least to get the job done.

Modi govt chose an opaque system instead
The centre, since 2018, has been picking millers based on Out Turn Ratio or OTR. OTR tells you the quantity of milled pulses you get from a unit of raw pulses. The miller, under this system, would be chosen for offering the highest OTR -- the least amount of raw pulses required
Read 13 tweets
Apr 8, 2021
SCOOP | Govt signed a shady deal that sold vehicular data of entire country to a company for cheap. This firm developed an entire business model based on this data and earned crores in revenue.

This happened 5 yrs before a policy to share the same data!

thewire.in/government/mod…
With this, the privacy of crores of Indians was compromised.

Strangely, the sale of bulk data was based on a proposal from the firm itself! The firm, Fast Lane Automotive, has been using the data to develop auto tech solutions and has global clients.
In 2019, the govt announced Bulk Data Sharing Policy that would sell vehicle data to private firms. After much backlash over privacy concerns it withdrew the policy less than a year later.

This was FIVE years after it had already sold data and later rescinded the deal.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(