At 8:30 am ET @BLS_gov delivers the most-important signals abt how economy is changing.
Forecasts’ center:
+400K jobs
3.5% unemployment rate, would = pre-pandemic low back to 1969.
Biggest question in the economy:
How quickly can we raise supply? Bring more labor & capital to production & boost productivity.
Success means more consumption & lower prices.
Failure means more-painful demand reductions.
Will we keep/get COVID under control in US/abroad?
Will employers increase supply by improving job offers fast enough to attract the people they say they want to hire, bring people off sidelines & compensate them for risks/hassles?
Relative to pre-pandemic, corporate profits (& margins) have grown at a much faster rate than consumer prices or hourly labor costs.
Many corporations have resources to improve job quality but holding back🧵
428K jobs gained last month (mid-Mar to mid-Apr), which coincidentally exactly equals March's revised growth.
-39K jobs in revisions of last 2 months
The trend in the number of U.S. jobs over the last 15 years shows that we remain just shy of pre-pandemic levels.
We have had fast, steady growth since Jan 2021, after weakness in late 2020 & job loss in Dec 2020.
The trend in over-the-year job growth shows how much faster our recent job growth has been than during the post-Great Recession recovery.
Job growth has decelerated a smidge:
552K/mo over most-recent 12 months
552K/mo over most-recent 6 months
523K/mo over most-recent 3 months
428K this past month
Fiscal policy at all gov't levels slowed economic growth by 2.96 pp in annualized terms in 2022Q1, @BrookingsInst.
Anyone talking about expansionary tax & spending policy has it backwards. We’ve had contractionary fiscal policy for 4 quarters.
Monetary policy shifted down too
The very low unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.6 percent. Not for good reasons, just stable.
Both the labor force participation rate (LFPR), at 62.2%, and the employment-population ratio (EPOP), at 60.0%, were little changed over the month.
These measures are each 1.2 percentage points (pp) below their February 2020 values.
Prime age (25-54 years old) employment to population ratio is an important measure of core labor market strength, omits people on the fringes of work.
It ticked down 0.1 pp to 79.9%, 0.6 pp below its pre-pandemic level. There's still room to improve here.
The missing employment is concentrated especially among Americans with less formal education.
The missing employment is no longer following clear patterns by race-ethnicity and gender.
Black men are estimated to be employed at greater rates than pre-pandemic but these estimates are somewhat noisy and a big population adjustment using 2020 Decennial shift lots in Jan.
What ages account for +2.4 million out of labor force & not wanting a job now?
Increase in the number of older Americans (55+) in this group accounts for 90% of its rise. Early retirements? COVID concern? Grandkid care?
Number of young folks in the group actually -110K.
That’s the extensive quantity (Q) margin. Intensive Q margin is average hours.
Average workweek hours for private sector steady at 34.6 hours. Has started normalizing after brutal pandemic plateau.
Because the temporary-help industry is the leading edge of flexibility in jobs, change in its employment level can give a leading sense of changes in broader market. It tends to go negative before recessions (and other times).
It's down near 0 for 2 months, suggesting softening.
In sum, looks like fast demand growth that we've seen is slowing due to brakes from fiscal & monetary policy, energy prices, & supply chains.
Still some slack but not easy to employ, relying on unretirements & demand for those with less formal educ (yay, Infrastructure Law!)
Gotta go downtown. Annual @SOLE_Labor_Econ meetings in Mpls this year. Hope to meet you if you're here.
I'm excited to have so many labor economists meeting @SOLE_Labor_Econ in Minneapolis starting tomorrow!
🧵on ideas for local food, culture, exercise, and getting around.
Food
Twin Cities are blessed with especially large, vibrant Hmong, and East African communities. Great, affordable Vietnamese and Ethiopian restaurants abound.
Corporate profits up 21%,
Consumer prices up 8%,
Hourly private-sector labor compensation up 7%.
Really interesting analysis @MollyKinder@kathrynsbach & Laura Stateler @BrookingsMetro looks at changes in profits and compensation among leading employers of essential workers.
For the younger half of U.S. workers, their own wages have grown faster over the year on average than consumer prices (CPI-U: +7.5% into last 3 months), much faster for the youngest workers.
Middle and older age workers' wage growth tended to lag CPI by a few percentage points.
Analysis launches off from @AtlantaFed Wage Growth Tracker (WGT). Follows those employed both in a recent month & 12 months prior, computes over-year wage growth rate for each, & describes growth rate distribution for various groups.
Mean wage growth across all such workers into the last 3 months (Dec21-Feb22) at 7.7% is fastest in 25 years & accelerating. CPI-U ⬆️ 7.5% over same.
Median wage growth (5.8%) & 75th %tile (17.9%) fastest in 25 years & accelerating too. 25th %tile (-0.1%) near series high.
The survey they cite found that, "When unvaccinated adults are asked what would convince them to get a COVID-19 vaccine, half say nothing could convince them." So the other half (19 million-ish) say something could convince them. But @nytimes gives us this lazy ⬇️ narrative.
Younger American workers experienced average growth in their own hourly wages that significantly outpaced average price growth (CPI-U) over the last year.
Middle-aged workers' wage growth lagged price growth a bit.
This differs from @BLS_gov's official real wage growth measure. That focuses on change in average hourly earnings among those employed now & those employed a year ago, mixing wage changes for people employed both times (what I focus on) with changes in the kind of people employed