Judge #Pardiwala who was at 47th seniority of all India Judges, trumped Chief Justices of all 25 High Courts.
But, his comparison with Bombay CJ, Dipankar Datta is most curious.
Datta & Pardiwala are born in same year, 1965. Datta in Feb & Pardiwala in Aug.
Datta was elevated
as a Judge of Calcutta High Court at his 41 years in 2006 & Pardiwala at 46 in 2011.
Datta is a serving Chief Justice since last 2 years & few days in Bombay. In addition to being a Chief Justice, he is Senior by 5 years to Pardiwala with a good record & without controversy
If Datta was elevated to Supreme Court before Pardiwala, he could have become the Chief Justice of India & served for 1 y and 9 mo. If Pardiwala was elevated immediately after Datta, he would have got 6 months tenure as the CJI.
Since, Pardiwala is elevated and Datta is not
elevated to Supreme Court, Pardiwala will be the CJI for 2 y & 3 mo. Even if Datt is elevated in future to fill up subsequent vacancies (there will be 7 vacancies till November) in Supreme Court, he will not become Chief Justice and therefore, the myth that early elevation can
possibly lead to becoming the Chief Justice of India is fully broken. What we see today is a grave of that myth. Also a myth that seniority plays a role in appointment of Judges is no longer valid. It has become old fashion under current regime of Modi & Supreme Court Collegium.
You may know that Judge Bela Trivedi was at 70th Seniority when she was elevated to Supreme Court, last year.
Why seniority then be observed in appointment of Chief Justice?
A myth of geographical representation on the Supreme Court is no longer being observed since many years.
There are several Judges from Maharashtra in Supreme Court but very few from Madras & Calcutta. After Judge Banerjee’s retirement in September, there will remain only one Judge from Calcutta in Supreme Court.
We have made several constitutional conventions in the past for
appointment of Judges in High Court & Supreme Court, all of them are (rightly or wrongly) being unmade in these days.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
——
इससे कोई यह कह सकता है की अयोध्या का फ़ैसला वाजपेयी सरकार
लिखकर गई थी, जो की ग़लत नहीं होगा क्योंकि वाजपेयी सरकार और बिजेपी का अयोध्या में राम मंदिर बनाना चुनावी वादा था. चंद्रचूड़ वाजपेयी सरकार में ASG थे. इसलिए वो इस मामले में unbiased नहीं कहे जा सकते है.
—-
फ़ैसले ऐसे ही बनते है, २०/२५ साल की तैयारी होती है. सावधान रहना चाहिए.
Dalits are not hindutva foot soldiers for communal riots.
Let’s unravel the fake propaganda:
1. Dalits are themselves victim of Hinduism.
2. Dalit are locked up in a old battle with Brahmanism.
3. Dalits are mostly busy in their earning livelihood & young Dalits in studies.
4. Dalits are neither leader nor supporters of BJP & Congress. Those Dalits, who are leaders in those manuwadi parties, they don’t enjoy community support.
5. Dalits are in friendly relationship with Christian, Sikhs, Muslims & other religious communities because they don’t
follow Hindu religion.
6. Many Dalits are afraid to go to Hindu temple due to fear of being thrashed or beaten up by Hindus for polluting temple.
6. Because, Dalits are not in businesses, their are financial not involved with Hindus.