Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
May 9, 2022 13 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Two sites stand out from the #pfizerdocuments randomization log as major anomalies....

Site 1231 and Site 4444

You are not going to believe this.....

@AaronSiriSG @fynn_fan @ClareCraigPath @profnfenton
The biggest recruiter by far is site 1231.
In Argentina. Well of course, for a joint German-American drug where else?

Site 1231 recruited 4501 patients.
That is 10% of the patients AT ONE SITE.
ALL 4501 patients were recruited in 3 weeks.
WOW! Image
This is site 1231 from the @ICANdecide log

Recognise the name?

We'll come back to him in a sec.... Image
The site is supposed to be the Military Central Hospital.

That's interesting.
It's also an interesting logo.
Seems to have given David Martin ideas for his website logo, but probably just coincidence. I dunno...
Anyway, it seems a bit odd that a principal investigator (who has to be a medical doctor) of a major international study is recruiting 4500 patients in 3 weeks at one site, without a CRO.

And working 7 days a week. No gaps. Recruitment every day incl Sat/Sun
Weekend recruitment for a clinical trial would be odd. Staff are needed to fill out that many record forms (CRFs) and there are potential risks to the trial, so you need medical staff. It would be highly unusual.

So who is he?
Here is his trial CV Image
Wait, hang on.
This is Fernando Polack.
The Fernando Polack who claims to be at Vanderbilt (USA) at the same time.
Who also happens to make appearances for the FDA...
Who also happens to work for The Infant Foundation and also happens to be funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the NIH

He is literally the busiest doctor on the planet infant.org.ar

But managed to find enough time to be the lead author on the #BNT162b2 paper (with all of Pfizer's scientists)
Yet while doing all this, he managed to find time to (presumably single-handedly because no other authors are listed at that site) recruit 4500 patients in 3 weeks, with each patient requiring 250 PAGES of case report forms (CRFs).

That is 1,125,000 pages of CRFs.
In 3 weeks.
But I'm sure that's totally above board until we get to the next totally above board feature of the fastest 44,000 patient study ever in history....


WTF is site 4444?

There were 270 clinical recruitment sites for the Pflzer vaccine study, numbered consecutively from 1001 to 1270.

There are all listed here.

This is the last page.
There is no site 1271.
There is no other site with a number above 1270. icandecide.org/wp-content/upl…
Well that's a bit of a problem because...
There are a lot of entries in the randomisation log for #site4444.
1275 patients to be exact.
About 3% of the total.
And you know what?
All 1275 "patients" were recruited in one week - from 22nd to 27th September 2020. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jan 25
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Following 4 years of enforced medical interventions does the public trust or distrust public health?
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Always worth recording after the early polling and before the pharma companies send in their accounts.

It's like Georgia. Someone flood the polling station quick! Image
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH And here we have it.
The poll started off in one direction, and as soon as the pharma brigade got hold of it, it went the opposite way.

The problem is that they now have 19 hours to keep the bots going.

@elonmusk please make poll voting a 2-step interaction. TY.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 28, 2023
It's a gene therapy.
It was a gene therapy yesterday.
It will still be a gene therapy tomorrow.
With a plasmid, it's two gene therapies.

The OGTR confirms:
"Under the gene technology act an [OGTR] approval would have been required"

@SenatorRennick @double_christ
@SenatorRennick @Double_Christ This was a lie from Dr Raj Bhula.
It's transfection.
It's in the Pfizer documents that the TGA have.
Everybody knows it's transfection.
If Dr Bhula doesn't know, she should resign immediately.
The OGTR failed.
From the document that @SenatorRennick is referring to.

They never knew what they were doing. They just needed to make you take it.
Who told them to do that?
And why was it necessary for you to have 3 transfections in order to earn a living?

Read 9 tweets
Oct 25, 2023
Hi @peterdaszak now that I have your attention why did Alice Latinne hide those viral sequences from your 2019 Nature paper, and where did the GP-120 sequences come from?

Asking for 6.9m people who can't, because they died.

Read 7 tweets
Oct 23, 2023
Well, it used to be rare.

This is the same rare lymphoma that Michel Goldman wrote about developing after a COVID mRNA "vaccine".

(see next tweet).

Michel Goldman's story in the Atlantic
Original paper - which was Michel Goldman's own story, published in Frontiers.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 22, 2023
Were the claims made in this press conference by a high profile CNN doctor true?

Watch the conference clip and follow the thread below.
It is impossible to know what is happening in another part of the world unless you are there.

But the statements made by Gassan Abu-Sittah cannot be true as made.

If not true they could even qualify as an incitement to further violence. Image
The claims made by Dr Abu-Sittah are not accidental or misinterpreted.

He specifically claimed that 500 people were killed - days after the press conference when it was known that was not true.

Read 15 tweets
Oct 18, 2023
The author of the BMJ article quoted by Viki as if it is gospel is a freelance journalist. He chose not to include that qualifier in this BMJ piece.

This tweet from Viki is propaganda because it suggests something that is not true, adding the @bmj_latest label for authenticity
@bmj_latest Here is the request for the data underlying the MBRRACE report.

Data from the @NPEU_UKOSS has previously been requested under FOI and denied.

This is not their data, it belongs to the British public who fund them.

@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS The BMJ article itself is just an opinion piece from a freelance journalist, basically repeating the party line - that only unvaccinated pregnant women died of COVID.

This is a misrepresentation of the truth.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!