The biggest recruiter by far is site 1231.
In Argentina. Well of course, for a joint German-American drug where else?
Site 1231 recruited 4501 patients.
That is 10% of the patients AT ONE SITE.
ALL 4501 patients were recruited in 3 weeks.
WOW!
This is site 1231 from the @ICANdecide log
Recognise the name?
We'll come back to him in a sec....
The site is supposed to be the Military Central Hospital.
That's interesting.
It's also an interesting logo.
Seems to have given David Martin ideas for his website logo, but probably just coincidence. I dunno...
Anyway, it seems a bit odd that a principal investigator (who has to be a medical doctor) of a major international study is recruiting 4500 patients in 3 weeks at one site, without a CRO.
And working 7 days a week. No gaps. Recruitment every day incl Sat/Sun
@IamBrookJackson
Weekend recruitment for a clinical trial would be odd. Staff are needed to fill out that many record forms (CRFs) and there are potential risks to the trial, so you need medical staff. It would be highly unusual.
So who is he?
Here is his trial CV
Wait, hang on.
This is Fernando Polack.
The Fernando Polack who claims to be at Vanderbilt (USA) at the same time.
Who also happens to make appearances for the FDA...
Who also happens to work for The Infant Foundation and also happens to be funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the NIH
He is literally the busiest doctor on the planet infant.org.ar
But managed to find enough time to be the lead author on the #BNT162b2 paper (with all of Pfizer's scientists)
Yet while doing all this, he managed to find time to (presumably single-handedly because no other authors are listed at that site) recruit 4500 patients in 3 weeks, with each patient requiring 250 PAGES of case report forms (CRFs).
That is 1,125,000 pages of CRFs.
In 3 weeks.
But I'm sure that's totally above board until we get to the next totally above board feature of the fastest 44,000 patient study ever in history....
#site4444
WTF is site 4444?
@IamBrookJackson
There were 270 clinical recruitment sites for the Pflzer vaccine study, numbered consecutively from 1001 to 1270.
There are all listed here.
This is the last page.
There is no site 1271.
There is no other site with a number above 1270. icandecide.org/wp-content/upl…
Well that's a bit of a problem because...
There are a lot of entries in the randomisation log for #site4444.
1275 patients to be exact.
About 3% of the total.
And you know what?
All 1275 "patients" were recruited in one week - from 22nd to 27th September 2020.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The dude keeps going, but betrays that this is a copycat to a bunch of accounts linked to one dubbed "Penguin" that only appeared when I pointed out the Joe Sansone scam that is being coordinated by Sasha Latypova to derail legal cases.
This is also strange.
The Quentin registry study shows a big jump in vaccination rate by age group but the Bernard study doesn't show the same.
This is more like what a synthetic data set might show based on assumed characteristics of the underlying data.
There are possible explanations for all of these anomalies, but this is the problem with secret registry data:
It's not credible when it conveniently matches a narrative and nobody is allowed to see it.
I'm going to explain why this chart is so important and why @jsm2334 is being disingenuous by ignoring it - whilst making points that undermine the "real world vaccine data" industry.
It's a Kaplan-Meier curve and it obliterates Jeffrey's argument.
Just to go over it... the lines show what proportion of subjects (children) ended up without chronic disease up to 10 years after being studied.
It's called a survival analysis because it's used for cancer survival.
If the red line was a cancer drug it would be a blockbuster
It shows that by the end of the 10 year follow-up, of those that they could still follow up (who stayed in the study) 57% (100-43%) of vaccinated kids had chronic disease (e.g. asthma) and 17% (100-83%) of unvaccinated kids did.
Janet Diaz was the person that led the #MAGICApp guideline committees that stopped your grandma getting antibiotics for her post-viral pneumonia, leading to her death.
But she did this with the help of @pervandvik who deleted his account
Diaz here tells you that COVID kills you by an overreacting immune response, but that was never true.
She was an intensivist recruited by the WHO in 2018.
None of this was true, but it sold a LOT of drugs and killed a LOT of people
Which US govt organisation blew a hole in the ozone layer in 1958 by sending atomic bombs to the troposphere over the Antarctic in operation Argus - then blaming the resulting destruction of ozone on CFC's?
It wasn't just Pfizer that hid the fact that the mRNA-LNP complex went to the ovaries (where it could not possibly provide its declared function in the lung).
The AMH drop (ovarian reserve) after vaccination was later shown by the Manniche paper after being denied by the Kate Clancy and Viki Males of the world.