The biggest recruiter by far is site 1231.
In Argentina. Well of course, for a joint German-American drug where else?
Site 1231 recruited 4501 patients.
That is 10% of the patients AT ONE SITE.
ALL 4501 patients were recruited in 3 weeks.
WOW!
This is site 1231 from the @ICANdecide log
Recognise the name?
We'll come back to him in a sec....
The site is supposed to be the Military Central Hospital.
That's interesting.
It's also an interesting logo.
Seems to have given David Martin ideas for his website logo, but probably just coincidence. I dunno...
Anyway, it seems a bit odd that a principal investigator (who has to be a medical doctor) of a major international study is recruiting 4500 patients in 3 weeks at one site, without a CRO.
And working 7 days a week. No gaps. Recruitment every day incl Sat/Sun
@IamBrookJackson
Weekend recruitment for a clinical trial would be odd. Staff are needed to fill out that many record forms (CRFs) and there are potential risks to the trial, so you need medical staff. It would be highly unusual.
So who is he?
Here is his trial CV
Wait, hang on.
This is Fernando Polack.
The Fernando Polack who claims to be at Vanderbilt (USA) at the same time.
Who also happens to make appearances for the FDA...
Who also happens to work for The Infant Foundation and also happens to be funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the NIH
He is literally the busiest doctor on the planet infant.org.ar
But managed to find enough time to be the lead author on the #BNT162b2 paper (with all of Pfizer's scientists)
Yet while doing all this, he managed to find time to (presumably single-handedly because no other authors are listed at that site) recruit 4500 patients in 3 weeks, with each patient requiring 250 PAGES of case report forms (CRFs).
That is 1,125,000 pages of CRFs.
In 3 weeks.
But I'm sure that's totally above board until we get to the next totally above board feature of the fastest 44,000 patient study ever in history....
#site4444
WTF is site 4444?
@IamBrookJackson
There were 270 clinical recruitment sites for the Pflzer vaccine study, numbered consecutively from 1001 to 1270.
There are all listed here.
This is the last page.
There is no site 1271.
There is no other site with a number above 1270. icandecide.org/wp-content/upl…
Well that's a bit of a problem because...
There are a lot of entries in the randomisation log for #site4444.
1275 patients to be exact.
About 3% of the total.
And you know what?
All 1275 "patients" were recruited in one week - from 22nd to 27th September 2020.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.
A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.
Just putting this into context. @DrCatharineY was originally DOD then published on a DARPA grant. One of her few co-authors is Stephanie Petzing of the "Center for Global Health Engagement"
All one big OneHealth family to nudge you into believing this @epiphare slop is real.
For the explanation as to why these "real world data" with "data not available" publications are absolutely junk and shouldn't be accepted to any major journal please see arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Dr Young (DARPA/DOD) is clearly now working as an ambassador to cover for the actions of the corrupt Biden regime who we are learning covered up huge amounts of adverse events from their COVID program whilst funding pharma in the "cancer moonshot"
It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.
Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.
This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics). nature.com/articles/s4154…
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"