Even fully-collateralized fiat stablecoins have depegged. Even some of the weak algo stablecoins have recovered.

Some thoughts. 🧵👇
I have always said that algo stables are subject to destabilizing bank runs. The only mechanism that can defend against this is a strong, active team that performs open market operations.
My thoughts and takeaways today:

1. We need a decentralized stablecoin. Fiat-backed stables are subject to legal seizure and capture. A decentralized economy needs a decentralized stablecoin whose backing store cannot be frozen or confiscated.
2. There isn't room in the market for a dozen, or half a dozen, or even just two algorithmic stablecoins. This is a market where the biggest one wins and all others lose.
3. If there'll be a decentralized stablecoin that succeeds, it'll be the one with the biggest value and the most battle-tested team.

Let that sink in. It's not a game where johnny-come-lately has a chance.
4. Hope you all can see why you should not touch copycat algo stables issued by purely technical teams. If the team's claim to fame is that they were once interns are Google, they are NGMI. The team that has the best open market operations is the only one that can pull it off.
5. For various regulatory reasons, there's no way a US-based team can succeed at an algo stable. Pretty much only a Korean, Singaporean or Swiss team has the right regulatory environment. All others are ticking time bombs.
6. For the algorithmic side of the stablecoin to work, the underlying chain has to offer high capacity and resilience under load. Few chains have the right mempool, fee and API infra to handle high loads.
7. The space is incredibly resilient. We just weathered a substantial bank run. Had this happened in TradFi, there would have been talk of doom and bailouts galore. One thing we know though, the bankers' bonuses would still be paid.
8. I'm not the least bit surprised by UST's resilience. Remember that every single stablecoin has, at times, depegged, including fully-collateralized fiat-backed stablecoins. All of them that have a real team behind them have bounced back.
9. The bounce back is a great arbitrage opportunity. The dynamic that gives rise to a bank run executes in reverse on the way back.
10. More complex stablecoin designs seem unlikely to be more stable under a bank run. The simpler the mechanism, the easier it is to understand and implement. I can imagine many more complex designs, I can't imagine that any of them would achieve better stability.
12. Every single sovereign currency has also had difficulty maintaining advertised pegs. There isn't much difference between sovereign fiat currencies and algo stablecoins in terms of the challenges faced when defending a peg.
13. Before anyone says "hey, open market operations by a team doesn't seem decentralized," remember that the value proposition here is to create an asset whose backing store is decentralized and can't be confiscated or frozen. A capable team is absolutely essential for this.
14. We all love drama, and it's possible to trade into the drama to eke out small percentage gains while taking on some risks that are hard to anticipate, like CEXes halting trades or deposits or what not. The real fortunes in crypto lie in more straightforward long trades.
Overall, the UST depegging played out exactly as we saw in past historical cases. I'm even more bearish on all copycats, and bullish on UST once the dust settles down.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Emin Gün Sirer🔺

Emin Gün Sirer🔺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @el33th4xor

Nov 22
Developing on Avalanche is now easier for more devs with the launch of the new Avalanche Rust SDK, an important step for the development of Avalanche Virtual Machines and Subnets.

Here's why ⬇️
Subnet architecture is the foundation for developers to create their own blockchains. The new Rust SDK is a toolkit of building blocks giving Rust developers an open canvas to create their own custom Virtual Machine in pure Rust on Avalanche.
Bundling and abstracting away consensus, networking, RPCs, etc, greatly reduces the time required to go from concept to deployment.

@_patrickogrady has a detailed breakdown of everything in the kit:
Read 6 tweets
Nov 15
Ok, question that came out of my weekly podcast: in computing a polycule, do you take the transitive closure of all the partners, or do you take the strongly connected component?
If A is partners with (B and C), B is partners with (A, C, and D), and C is partners with (A, B), is the polycule

a. A, B, C, D or
b. A, B, C
Inquiring minds want to know, poly friends as well as others, please chime in.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 14
Proof of Reserves is a good start, but it needs to be coupled with Proof of Liabilities in order to be useful.
You have to be able to say:
1. sum of reserves >= sum of liabilities
2. there are no *other* liabilities

(1) is relatively easy, by providing a Merkle tree of reserves and a crowdsourced list where everyone can check that their own account is listed as a liability.
(2) is a hard problem. The CEO could obtain an off-the-proof/off-the-books line of credit and gamble it away, causing an additional liability not in the PoR/PoL proofs.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 10
These are tumultuous times. I’ve heard that a lot of Avalanche-native projects have been insulated from the FTX plague, but if that’s not the case please reach out:
Like every crisis in crypto, communities will grow stronger through lessons learned here. Having been through many of those moments (Mt. Gox, DAO Hack, countless other protocol failures), I can, without a doubt, reassure you that it will get better.
I encourage everyone to take care of yourselves first, then check-in with friends and peers across communities, prioritizing kindness above all else.
Read 15 tweets
Nov 2
So many people on my timeline have the wrong take on this. No, free speech doesn't require you to pay $8/month. No, you can't pay $8 and pretend to be POTUS.
Blue checkmarks can play three roles:
1. Sybil protection: They guard against bots pretending to be millions of people in support of an idea
2. Authentication: They validate that the person behind the account has the displayed name.
3. Weighting: because the account is verified not to be a bot, it can be displayed higher in timelines, be displayed in more timelines, etc.

The third one presents an interesting trade-off against the other two.
Read 10 tweets
Nov 1
What on earth has happened to @YahooNews that it's reporting random friend group drama to its global audience?
In the post-truth era, there has been a proliferation of newsy-looking sites that just report "so and so said such and such on Twitter." These bring no value.
Not to mention the tiktoks that just repeat random reddit posts. Look, all these sites are available to all of us. The world gains nothing by yet another site repeating unverified junk from some other site.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!