The National Republican Senatorial Committee circulated talking points insisting that Republicans aren't pushing toward a total ban on abortion, nor infringing on other privacy rights like contraception.

HERE is the truth about what's happening in red state gov'ts RIGHT NOW ⬇️
ARKANSAS: If Roe is overturned, the state has a 2019 “trigger law” that will immediately ban abortions within the state except to save the life of the mother. The state's AG affirmed that this ban would take effect immediately. arkansasonline.com/news/2022/may/…
GEORGIA: 26 states are certain or likely to ban or severely restrict abortion without Roe, according to the Guttmacher Institute. GA's Gov. Kemp vowed that if the Supreme Court’s leaked ruling becomes final, he would lead efforts to criminalize abortion. khn.org/news/article/w…
IDAHO: The state House's Assistant Majority Leader said his caucus would consider banning certain forms of birth control, including Plan B emergency contraception and intrauterine devices (IUDs).

To be clear: Plan B and IUDs are used to PREVENT pregnancy.
LOUISIANA: State House Republicans advanced a new bill which would classify abortion as homicide and allow prosecutors to criminally charge patients and doctors. Experts say the bill could also criminalize in vitro fertilization & emergency contraception. washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
MISSISSIPPI: If Roe is struck down, a "trigger law" passed in MS in 2007 would automatically ban all abortions—except in cases of rape, or to save the life of the mother. There is no exception for incest. Gov. Reeves has said he would enforce the ban. newsweek.com/mississippi-go…
MISSISSIPPI: On @MeetThePress, Governor Reeves would not say whether he would sign legislation banning birth control.
nbcnews.com/meet-the-press…
MISSOURI: The state has floated a first-of-its-kind proposal to allow private citizens to sue anyone who helps a Missouri resident have an abortion outside the state—from the out-of-state physician to whoever helps transport a person across state lines. politico.com/news/2022/03/1…
OKLAHOMA: OK's Governor just signed a 6-week abortion ban into law—a near copycat to last fall's Texas ban on reproductive health care choices. abcnews.go.com/Health/oklahom…
TENNESSEE: Gov. Bill Lee signed legislation that would criminalize obtaining abortion pills through mail delivery. The original bill had up to a 20-year prison sentence. newschannel5.com/news/gov-lee-s…
TEXAS: Aside from last year's unconstitutional ban, TX Rs have suggested introducing bills that would stop women from traveling out of state to get abortions, target abortion assistance funds, and reclassify emergency contraception like Plan B as abortion. texastribune.org/2022/05/09/tex…
13 states (Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming) have trigger laws that would automatically ban abortion in the first and second trimesters if Roe is overturned.
Trigger laws in Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, North Dakota, Tennessee, and Utah would make providing an abortion a felony. Idaho’s law would carry sentences of up to two to five years for providers. boisestatepublicradio.org/politics-gover…
It's not just red states that are at risk for potential attacks on Roe and reproductive health care. Republican Leader McConnell has already floated the idea of a nationwide abortion ban the next time Republicans control Congress and the White House. thehill.com/news/senate/34…
It is a fact that conservative majorities in numerous state governments are preparing for a post-Roe America. Regardless of the Court’s final decision, it is imperative Congress enshrine into law the right to make one's own reproductive health care choices.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Senate Judiciary Committee

Senate Judiciary Committee Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JudiciaryDems

Apr 7
Let's get right to it: Senator Cruz and others who spoke on the floor today are wrong... yet again.

Here's why ⬇️
1. Judge Jackson provided documents totaling 12,000 pages from her time on the Sentencing Commission alone. If you stacked all those pages together, you'd get a pile nearly four feet tall—and that's not counting her nearly 600 opinions. Republicans have all relevant material.
If we're going to discuss Judge Jackson's selection process for #SCOTUS, let’s remember that former President Trump openly admitted that his judicial nominees would be “all picked by the Federalist Society.”
Read 34 tweets
Apr 6
Yesterday, multiple Republican Senators made a series of inaccurate claims about Judge Jackson in an attempt to rationalize their “no” votes. If you’re going to oppose such a well-qualified & historic nominee, at least tell the truth to the American people.

HERE are the facts ⬇️
1. Judge Jackson’s record shows that she does not engage in judicial decision-making with a specific result in mind. She’s ruled for and against plaintiffs, criminal defendants, law enforcement, unions, employers, and the Trump and Obama Administrations.
Judge Jackson has a proven record of fidelity to the law without regard to her personal views. Throughout her career, she has placed herself squarely within the judicial mainstream. There is absolutely no truth behind Republican claims of judicial activism.
Read 23 tweets
Apr 4
Some Republican Senators have criticized Judge Jackson for recognizing the anguish a criminal conviction can cause the defendant’s family. But judges they supported have said the same thing—and spoken with far more sympathy about child pornography offenders. (thread)
Senators Cruz and Cotton voted for Judge Kurt Engelhardt’s elevation to the Fifth Circuit. This was after, as a district court judge, he sentenced a defendant found with nearly 3,000 images depicting sexual exploitation of minors. Here’s what he said at the sentencing:
On the offender: “[T]he offender is almost always someone who is from a good family, someone who is gainfully employed [and] someone who is intelligent—usually above-average intelligence.”
Read 6 tweets
Apr 4
Numerous Trump judicial nominees declined to label their judicial philosophy during their confirmation hearings. Republicans supported them all. Below is a just a small sample. (thread)
Chief Justice Roberts stated during his confirmation hearing: “I have said I do not have an overarching judicial philosophy that I bring to every case, and I think that’s true.”
Justice Alito stated at his confirmation hearing: “I think that all these labels when you are trying to describe how judges behave—how they do their work—have their limitations, and different people use them in different ways.”
Read 11 tweets
Apr 4
THREAD: Republicans claim Judge Jackson evaded their questions. With over 23 hours of in-person questioning and a record-breaking 1500 written questions for the record (QFRs), let's take a look at what some of these questions were ⬇️
Cruz QFR No. 102: “President Joe Biden announced that he would only consider possible nominees who are African American women. Are you aware of what criteria or qualities the office of White House Counsel used to determine whether possible nominees are women?”
Cotton QFR No. 9: “Is it possible for men to become pregnant?”

(In her response, Jackson noted that no other Supreme Court nominee has been asked to explain whether men can become pregnant or answer related questions on the biological differences between men and women.)
Read 7 tweets
Mar 25
The Republican Leader's opposition to the first Black woman nominated to the Supreme Court must be based on some alternative set of facts—because he said himself she is "clearly qualified."

HERE are the facts ⬇️
On court packing: The size of #SCOTUS is up to Congress, not SCOTUS itself and certainly not Judge Jackson. When then-Judge Barrett was asked about Court expansion, she herself said “That is a question left open to Congress” and that she “couldn’t opine on it.”
On judicial philosophy: Now-Chief Justice Roberts during his SCOTUS confirmation hearing: “I do not have an overarching judicial philosophy that I bring to every case.” Judge Jackson went further and clearly explained her approach to decisionmaking on the bench.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(