I'm interested.
#GoogleGlass
Text next to someone's face might have surprising use-cases in #healthcare.
"Google's work with AR will likely be incremental" - hope so. But then what is the long-term vision?
cnet.com/tech/computing…
#GoogleGlass
Text next to someone's face might have surprising use-cases in #healthcare.
"Google's work with AR will likely be incremental" - hope so. But then what is the long-term vision?
cnet.com/tech/computing…
obv this is a sneak peek and broadly CG, but still:
I like the form factor. AR Glasses should not be discernible from normal glasses.
Like HTC Vive XR; these looks dorky (sorry)
(Image courtesy of @Muropaketti)
I like the form factor. AR Glasses should not be discernible from normal glasses.
Like HTC Vive XR; these looks dorky (sorry)
(Image courtesy of @Muropaketti)
A relatively "big" thing about this sneak peek is, imo, the fact that the content seems to exist in 3D space.
There's 2 ways, really, talking in terms of engineering, to make this happen on glasses:
Option 1. Lidar or optical projectors on the glasses draw dots - like the iPhone - and using those dots you project virtual content.
Option 2. Something completely different.
Option 1. Lidar or optical projectors on the glasses draw dots - like the iPhone - and using those dots you project virtual content.
Option 2. Something completely different.
It's eery, but this paper we published in 1993 continues to be relevant. I'm half hoping Google pokes me sometime, because I'm not exactly keeping it a secret.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8315467/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8315467/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
