A 🧵about @GNDRising disruption of Home Secretary Priti Patel's talk at the Bassetlaw Conservatives Association dinner.
This🧵seeks to critically interrogate this action from the perspective of Black & WoC migrants @UnisNotBorders to develop discussion & better practices.
We recognise the importance of disruptions, we also question the ethicality in putting funds into the Tory party. Dinners like this go for an excess of £400 or £4,000 a ticket. Source: mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
How much did @GNDRising pay to the Tories to disrupt their meeting?
Is it ethical for @GNDRising, a new NGO, to use funds to pay to “disrupt” a Tory dinner attended by right-wing xeno-racist sycophantic followers of Priti Patel who care nothing for migrants? Did @GNDRising think that their disruption would elicit policy change from a fascist?
The @GNDRising piece in the Guardian discussed how “scary” it was to confront Priti Patel. For white British activists, who paid money to attend a Tory party dinner, how scary was it compared to migrants actually fighting for survival due in part to the #HostileEnvironment?
While @GNDRising maintain their actions were “the right thing” as migrants affected by UK’s draconian border policies, we see it as white saviour politics intended for media clicks. Nothing tangible was accomplished by this action that will positively affect our lives.
Compare @GNDRising recent media stunt with those in Edinburgh who recently stopped an immigration raid or the Battle of Kenmure Street nearing its 1 yr anniversary (13 May), & we see actions positively drawing communities together to make UK xeno-racist policies inoperable.
Much of UK migrant & climate organising is still dominated by white, middle class Brits. Migrants of colour-led activism are still relegated to the back & deliberately unseen, while white activists are hyper-visible & view migrants with a charity-driven mentality.
While we are all working to eradicate injustice & oppressive systems, we should not fall back on media stunts that produce no tangible support in order to increase our clout, esp if it’s an NGO looking to access more funding streams & direct links to national & int’ media.
Again, maybe this wasn’t @GNDRising’s intention, but as racialised migrant-led grassroots activists, we found your Tory dinner interruption underwhelming when what we need is massive levels of disruption in our communities to stop UK’s xeno-racist systems.
Migrant-led & allies alike concerned about the increasing border violence, esp with the passing of the Nationality & Borders Bill. But media stunts won’t stop this egregious problem. It will be through community organising & education & mass disruptions. End of 🧵
As @UnisNotBorders approaches another yr of organising during the Covid pandemic, we want to share highlights of what we've done in 2021 & what we hope to accomplish approaching our 6th yr of advocating for migrant university staff & students against #HostileEnvironment.
January 20201
@UnisNotBorders kept the pressure by amplifying in @FT the how UK universities were putting migrant student into destitution & how #NRPF, #HostileEnvironment & marketised higher education are all harming migrant students during pandemic: ft.com/content/3ab6be…
While the VC enjoys his Christmas, @UnisNotBorders has been assisting @USSU International Student Officer, @caituee on cases of migrant student homelessness @SussexUni. These cases are part of systemic issues including #HostileEnvironment + marketised higher education.
Student A is a migrant postgrad @SussexUni with their family (partner & 3 children). They arrived in October 2021 & since, have been moving from short-term let to another w/o any stable, long-term housing. Student A & their family's mental & physical health are deteriorating.
Student A's children have not been able to enroll in school since coming to the UK because of a lack of stable housing. Student A's has been so focused on finding housing that they can't focus on their coursework.
There have been a lot of superficial discussions re- clause 9 of the Nationality and Borders Bill which seeks to remove British citizenship without notice.
What isn't being discussed is clause 9 relation to extending UK's counter-terrorism/War on Terror laws.
Firstly, clause 9 didn't come out of nowhere. During the early days of the War on Terror, @UKLabour included the deprivation of British nationality section to the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
The deprivation of British nationality within the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 meant that if a British-dual national committed acts that seriously prejudiced the interests of the UK and it's overseas territories that their British citizenship would be revoked.