Trent Telenko Profile picture
May 14, 2022 30 tweets 7 min read Read on X
This thread🧵 will be my Ukraine War overview.

Russia is losing 2/3 of a battalion combat group of equipment a day and we are into day 79.

That's over 52.6 full battalion equipment sets out of the 120 initially sent into Ukraine & ~180 over all in the Russian Ground Forces

1/
IOW, 43% of the total committed Russian mechanized combat vehicle fleet and likely the best 29% of the total Russian combat vehicle fleet have been destroyed or captured.

Percentage casualty rate wise, this is the institutional equivalent of the III Armored Corps in Ft Hood
2/ ImageImageImage
... Texas catching a high yield tac-nuke for the US Army.

Per the Oryx visual compilations, Ukraine is losing one vehicle destroyed or captured for every 3.5 Russian vehicles.

If the current Ukrainian casualty rates match the 2014-2015 fighting.

3/
Ukraine is taking about one casualty for between 5 & 7 Russian casualties right now.

The Ukrainian diaspora email list I participated in carefully collated Ukraine versus Russian casualties in the 2014-2015 period of Donbas fighting.
4/
The aggregate Ukraine vs Russia losses in 2014-2015 were:

AFU Losses in total: ~3,000 "KIA";
AFU Non-Combat Losses: 1,294;
AFU Combat Losses: ~2,000 KIA;
Russian Combat Losses: ~15,000 KIA;

5/ Image
This yields two kill ratios:

Aggregate Kill Ratio: ~5:1 counting all AFU losses;

Combat Kill Ratio: ~7.3:1 counting only AFU losses due to Enemy Action;

Note: "AFU" is Armed Forces Ukraine
6/
An unknown are the claimed ~800 Ukrainian MIAs. If those men are counted as KIAs, it pushes that kill ratio number for the AFU down.

Suffice it to say I expected Ukraine to do far, far, better than most defense analysts when this latest round of fighting kicked off.🤷

7/
Chief Military Prosecutor of the AFU, Gen Matios stated in this article:

Shocking statistics of non-battle casualties of Ukraine's army
web.archive.org/web/2016081515…
6/
Chief Military Prosecutor of the AFU, Gen Matios stated in this article:

Shocking statistics of non-battle casualties of Ukraine's army
web.archive.org/web/2016081515…
8/
An unknown are the claimed ~800 Ukrainian MIAs. If those men are counted as KIAs, it pushes that kill ratio number for the AFU down.

Suffice it to say I expected Ukraine to do far, far, better than most defense analysts when this latest round of fighting kicked off.🤷

7/
Chief Military Prosecutor of the AFU, Gen Matios stated in this article:

Shocking statistics of non-battle casualties of Ukraine's army
web.archive.org/web/2016081515…
8/
...that the single largest cause of AFU non-combat losses was lethal medical conditions, resulting from inadequate medical screening of personnel who were being called up during the conscription campaign, that covered men of up to 45 years of age.

9/
As the list-admin observed at the time:

"1. Russians are accustomed to taking heavy combat losses and the political blowback is much smaller than would be seen in any Western nation;

2.The high combat loss rates deplete the aggregated experience pool in the Russian military
10/
... dumbing it down, and making it more likely to take foolish risks, and offer bad assessments to the nation's political leaders;

The realities of (1) & (2) have been observed repeatedly in the Ukrainian war, and given the losses sustained in middle ranking and junior
11/
...officers in the campaign, the propensity to blind optimism and the tendency to starting fights that sane people would not start will obviously continue for decades.

The punchline is that the culture of yes men surrounding the leader, the general insensitivity to combat...
12/
...losses, and the depletion of talent and expertise will make the Russians prone to starting fights they cannot win for the foreseeable future.

Put differently, the Ukrainian war has made the Russians much more dangerous than they were before this war."
13/
The previous passage was why I was stating Twitter in January & early February 2022 that the Russians really were going to go for a full regime change invasion.

The reason I didn't surface any of this then was Russian disinformation had so overrun Western government policy
14/
...makers, the ranks of senior intelligence officials, and corporate media that anyone mentioning it without months of videos showing incompetent Russian military performance versus superb Ukrainian combat tactics would be labeled a flipped out kook.

15/
The applicable proverbs which applied while I waited to surface this:

"There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see."

"There none so deaf as those who do not wish to hear."

16/
Simply _No One_ wanted to see or hear that the Russian Military is really a uniformed version of the movie "Idiocracy."

25,000 dead Russian soldiers still isn't enough for many of them right now.

"Directed Cognition" does that.

17/
For the rest of you, we have this BBC screaming headline:

Ukraine entering new phase of war, defence minister says - BBC
bbc.com/news/live/worl…
18/
Ukraine is going for a one million citizen military mobilization.

The six years of Dombas fighting conscript classes plus prewar Ukrainian military is ~650,000 right there.

Add in the mobilizing territorials, & yeah, one million Ukrainians under arms are here by 30 June.
19/
These Ukrainian reinforcements include the six conscript classes who fought in Donbas in 2016-2021.

That is, the Ukrainians are calling combat veterans back to the colors fighting in the same areas that they served six to nine months of combat in, working with NCO's
20/
...who are already fighting there.

Russian conscripts present in Ukraine & being called up are barely trained greenhorns with no NCO's to speak of.

Effectively, 100 Ukrainians are generating the same combat power as 300 Russian troops.
21/
And this combat effectiveness value ratio is increasingly in Ukraine's favor over time.

As the Russians lose more and more of their best soldiers & vehicles.

Their greenhorn replacements die faster & kill fewer Ukrainians.

22/
The Russian offensives at Izyum and Severodonietsk failing beyond recovery is confirmation that my prediction of the Russian tactical truck fleet collapsing right now is close to the mark.

Russia has lost the ability to do more than a single push out of the Donbas, and then
23/
... only with civilian trucks.

We are in the beginnings of a Russian Lanchester square law curve collapse.
24/
Like Japanese airpower in WW2's Pacific theater. There is no easy way to analytically predict when that sort of collapse happens.

I've publicly stated on Chicago Talk Radio that the end of June is when the trend lines say the Russian Army falls apart.

25/
Ukrainian J2 MGen Budanov was just interviewed & predicting the Russians will break in August.

Kyiv, in the first week of the war, called out for all Ukrainians anywhere with any military experience to come home and fight.

26/
Ukrainians are returning from all over English speaking world. This is a enormous pool of manpower with diverse skills.

Whatever else you want to say, in the manpower game. Russia has lost absolutely.

27/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

May 12
This is one of the most logistically incompetent hot takes by any German journalist in the Russo-Ukrainian War.

95% getting through is a 5% loss rate per trip
95%(x) for 10 to 20 kills means x = 200 to 400 trucks on this route
10 trips means 40% total fleet loss - 80 to 160 trucks
1/Image
You can follow the 5% loss curve in this 500 unit fleet at 10 exposures in the graphic below.

A 40% fleet loss in 10 days from a 5% drone loss rate is logistical collapse for the Russian Army in occupied Ukraine.

Only some trying to get AfD eyeballs would say different.

2/ Image
This leaves out the fact that the Russian Army doesn't use *ANY* mechanized logistical enabler like pallets, Truck D-rings, forklifts, or telehandlers.

Russian trucks are in the drone kill zones 3 times as long as a Western truck due to loading times.

Receipts:
3/3
x.com/i/grok/share/e…
Read 4 tweets
May 10
Regarding this:

"The DF-26 intermediate-range ballistic missile, with a range of approximately 4,000 to 5,000 kilometers, was specifically designed and publicly nicknamed by Chinese military analysts as the "Guam Killer.""

I disagree with those analysts.
1/
The Chinese PD-2900 drone (2,500 km range, 12-hour endurance, 250 km/h speed, stealthy Su-57-like design) is far more a "Guam Killer" than the DF-26.

It is a matter of numbers.

2/
As laid out by warquants -dot- com, China is buying one million OWA drones to destroy all US/Taiwan/Taiwan allied military logistics from Guam to the China coast.

A quantity of one million "Shaheed plus" class OWA drones has quality all its own.

3/
Read 7 tweets
May 5
The reduction in murder deaths -IS NOT- due to law enforcement, or reductions in underlying rates of violence.

It is due to the fact that medical care has improved such that the same gunshot wound inflicted in 2015 is 1/3 as lethal as 1960.

Murder rate🧵
1/
Homicide statistics since the early 1960s are not comparable to earlier periods because medical advances have turned many fatal injuries into survivable ones.

See the CDC report below⬇️


2/
There are four major medical trauma care changes since 1960 reducing murder rates:

1. Trauma centers established ~1961.

2. Standardized trauma procedures ~1978.

3. Adoption of military (Korea/Vietnam) emergency treatment, air transport, and improved triage ~1986.

3/
Read 5 tweets
Apr 29
This passage:

"Lebanese security forces reportedly seized 1 truck last June carrying 5,000 explosive drones..."

...is the heart of why I say that the US Army & USMC ground troops will bleed heavily in their first real drone war.

Drone War🧵
Each of those 5,000 Hezbollah drones is individually far more lethal than a dumb 155mm shell, and a 5-ton truck can carry only 176 of them.

Each of those 5,000 drone can kill a truck carrying those 176 shells.

2/ Image
You simply can't hide from drones like you can from a shell.

It will follow you inside hard cover with a thermobaric warhead.

There is no safe space on the battlefield unless you build one with fishing nets and drone jammers.
3/ Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 29
I'm tempted to say the difference between military flag ranks who are competent at 2026 peer to peer warfare, and those who are not, is the understanding and application of attritional loss curves to combat loss rates, electronic warfare and logistics.

Professional military education (PME)🧵
1/Image
The set of curves I had an AI produce for me above have been used for air warfare many times starting at the end of WW2, in the USSBS after WW2 and by many classic RAND airpower studies from the 1950's to 1980's.

2/ Image
All post 9/11/2001 Western flag ranks are counter-insurgency (COIN) trained & experienced.

They have no gut feel at all to statistical attrition models at all.

These "COIN-head" flags may prove to be highly resistant to changing this. Which is required to deal with drones.
2/Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 27
The effectiveness of drones is directly affected by the electronic warfare competence of the drone users.

The fact that the US Army defenestrated every EW practitioner in the 2000's and has compete "EW virgins" as flag rank leadership means it will fail with mass casualties in its first major drone war combat.
1/3
A US Army serious about drone warfare would:

- Rebuild the full EW enterprise with organic division-level EW battalions and real exercises.

- Embed EW jamming into all combat branches (not MI-only).

- Shift to gun/autocannon dominant combined-arms counter-drone doctrine.

2/3
- Require FAA drone pilot + Ham radio licenses for flag ranks to build drone domain literacy.

None of these four reforms will happen until after US Army soldiers are deep in both defeat and buckets of blood.

3/3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(