Against the testimonies of all those witnesses, you have a young man's outburst.
What is he so terribly indignant about? That the Govt.is unable to protect him & he is afraid for his life & his fellows.
From whom? From Jihadi terrorists.
Who is he saying is protecting/helping them now? Kashmiri Muslims in whose houses they are staying.
Who are the people providing information about where these people are staying and safe houses/communication, food, weapons, money,
"information to the Jihadis? Other Kashmiri Muslims.
I don't know if the decision to allow them to live individually in different places was to allow them to re-integrate into Kashmiri society, rather than put them up in some seperate dependable but isolated compounds.
If so, it is obvious that the terrorists want to literally shoot down that idea, by selectively murdering the Kashmiri Hindus. In a very tragic & unacceptable sense, this is a victory of the terrorists. And this is the time you chose to be derisive?
"Modi govt doesn’t take decisions that will please people, but those are good for them: Amit Shah
Speaking at a book launch, HM Shah said Modi is a great listener. “You might forget what you said to him. But even after 5 years he will remember & remind you that you said this”
"While speaking at the event, Naidu said even Modi’s detractors agree he is a phenomenon, whether they like it or not. “Under his leadership, India is respected across the world. Modi gave a three line mantra – reform, perform and transform—which he lives by…"
"The second aspect, according to the NSA, is that the strikes were a political call taken by the Prime Minister, “which meant he was taking responsibility not only for success, but also for failure”. “This exhibited risk-taking at the highest level — a quality shown by very few."
"According to Doval, the strike was so effective that the then Pakistan leadership “castigated its ground formations for failing to block even one strike team”, despite having a large number of forward deployed troops."
#RanaAyubbMisinforms
In her anxiety to peddle Muslim victimisation narrative, Rana Ayubb assumes "shot" to be "shot dead" and tweets accordingly.
"Does Rana Ayyub think that cattle smugglers shooting at police should get a free pass if they are Muslims" opindia.com/2022/05/wapo-c…
That goes to show the kind of fact-checking she does, not that the declining islamo-left @washingtonpost cares.
"We reported that the accused were running away after stealing a cow in a Scorpio vehicle.
The Police chased them, during which their vehicle safely.
collided with a tree. The Police asked them to surrender, but the smugglers opened fire. A constable reportedly got injured. In retaliation, the Police opened fire, and all three cow smugglers were wounded. The cow had been rescued."
Oh! This is what has set off all those mocking
Akhand Bharat.
RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat saying (April 13), "India will again become 'Akhand Bharat' in 15 years. We all will see this with our own eyes.”
And .. Akhil Bharatiya Akhara Parishad president Swami Ravindra Puri (of Mahanirvani Akhara), who said, "Astrological predictions suggest that we will realise the dream of Akhand Bharat in the next 20-25 years."
The Akhand Bharat being mocked by many, actually refers to modern-day Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet, Sri Lanka, Maldives and Myanmar.
"many Christians remain hesitant to give up the image of white Jesus. He believes the continued popularity of white depictions of Jesus are “an example of how far in some respects the United States has not moved.”
"At least that’s how he appeared when she was growing up. A copy of Warner E. Sallman’s “Head of Christ” painting hung in her home, depicting a gentle Jesus with blue eyes turned heavenward and dark blond hair cascading over his shoulders in waves."