Something interesting is happening in the sport world over the idea of fair competition, specifically re: Trans. Some sport philosophers argue that one's achievements in sport aren't meritorious. Others want the competitive elements eliminated or at least severely reduced. 1/6
Follow the arguments and you can easily end up in a place where fair competition becomes meaningless. For merit, if we cannot claim to be deserving of victory and achievement, it makes the idea of winning or losing meaningless, since the winner didn't earn their victory. 2/6
This dovetails quite nicely with the anti-competition thrust. If one cannot deserve achievement (for various reasons) then it stands that competition itself is not the purpose of sport, then we shouldn't care about winning or losing. 3/6