We're nearing the third anniversary of an important @RockefellerFdn meeting on "The Future of Climate Finance" which I was lucky enough to convene at #RFBellagio. Well before #GFANZ was a thing, for better or worse, it's where the concept of "net zero-aligned finance" was born.🙄
Think back to June 2019, fully 6 months before Covid! The @IPCC_CH report on 1.5C had popularized science-based pathways to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. @UN Secretary-General @antonioguterres was planning a big conference on enhanced ambition... thehill.com/opinion/energy…
...But the idea of net zero-aligned finance was not yet a thing! Indeed, the hard work of translating science into actual net zero pathways in the real economy, across sectors like steel, cement, transport... even power generation... hadn't really happened yet! @sciencetargets 👀
Into this messy moment we lobbed the #netzero-aligned financial system concept.
Looking back on it now... and reviewing my meeting notes... I'm actually shocked by how far we've come in realizing the vision (albeit still partial and preliminary) of net zero-aligned finance first mapped out just a few short years ago! But I'm also concerned...
While recent efforts like the UK’s @TPTaskforce are laudable, far too much public finance and public policy still runs at cross purposes with the path to net zero. That must change, beginning with the IFIs & DFIs whose mandates are most obviously aligned. e3g.org/news/hm-treasu…
And while much of the recent flowering of a climate-related fin reg agenda is seeking better data and disclosure on *climate risk* we’ve still got a long way to go in developing a whole-of-government approach to net zero alignment. To say nothing of defending rules in litigation!
Finally, it’s still far too common for asset owners, asset managers, banks and other biz to deploy some dedicated “green” or “low carbon” capital somewhere while financing fossil fuel expansion or other activity that’s clearly not net zero compatible. Sigh… much more work to do.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The fossil fuel industry is not just in terminal decline; it's also corrupt. #Vitol's settlement w/the Dep't of Justice over violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act #FCPA is an important reminder that transparency & disclosure alone aren't enough to prevent abuse. Thread:
Full disclosure (pun intended): I wrote a lengthly law review article about this topic a decade ago. See "Transparency & the Natural Resource Curse: Examining the New Extraterritorial Information Forcing Rules in the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… /2
The FCPA is an extraterritorial criminal statute that makes it illegal for US firms to bribe foreign officials. Congress passed it in 1977 in response to genuinely outrageous behavior by Lockheed. Notably, until 2010 or so, the US was alone in criminalizing foreign bribes. /3
Thread on new @CFTC#climaterisk report. Here are the highlights: First & perhaps most importantly, this report was a) commissioned by a majority-Republican federal regulatory agency and b) represents the consensus views of banks, investors, big companies, academics & enviros 1/
2/ Topline message: "US financial regulators must recognize that climate change poses serious emerging risks to the US financial system, and they should move urgently and decisively to measure, understand, and address these risks." Full report here (PDF): cftc.gov/sites/default/…
3/ Notably, the CFTC #climaterisk report does not just make recommendations to the CFTC, and is not limited by the jurisdiction of this agency (commodities, derivatives markets, etc). Also notable: the recommendations aren't binding. If Biden wins, they'll be a blueprint at best.
Leaving #sustainablefinance standard setting to the EU alone (while the best we can do in light of Trump) is a suboptimal solution to a real challenge for the global capital markets' transition to net zero.
3/ Yet without US capital markets regulators like SEC/CFTC/Treasury/Fed in the game, we're stuck with a very European, prescriptive approach to #SustainableFinance regulation... e.g. treating "solid" fossil fuels like coal differently than oil & gas. ft.com/content/07083d…
Thread: Bezos will spend $10 billion of his own fortune to give out grants to scientists, activists and nonprofits to help fight climate change. Bravo! apne.ws/YpCqkx1
Lots of hot takes today about the new #BezosEarthFund... most of which focus on Bezos’ idiosyncrasies, Amazon’s environmental footprint, or the role of wealth in society. Note: This is not a thread about whether billionaires are bad. vox.com/platform/amp/r…@teddyschleifer /2
As someone who was responsible for $100M+ worth of climate grants for another, ahem, relatively high-profile billionaire philanthropist, I think there’s a relatively obvious yet under-appreciated question posed by Bezos’ $10B pledge... /3