The M777 is a towed 155 mm howitzer with a gun crew of 8 soldiers or 10 marines.
1/n
There is a whole lot of battery and Battery Fire Direction Center (FDC) stuff that I will skip to focus on the operation of one M777.
When a fire mission is received a battery's M777 guns move to their firing positions.
2/n
Upon arrival half of a M777's crew emplaces the gun. Which means shovelling holes for the gun's spurs, raising the barrel, etc.
The less the gun moves after firing the faster the crew can fire the next projectile, so the spurs are buried deep in the earth.
3/n
Meanwhile the rest of crew prepares the projectiles. Projectiles are transported with a lifting plug instead of a fuze.
A crew only prepares the projectiles for the current fire mission. Nothing worse than having to remove a fuze when you want to escape counter battery fire.
4/n
Next step: unscrew the lifting plug and screw in the fuze.
There are a lot of fuzes: point detonating (super quick, delay) time (time, variable time), proximity, etc.
In this photo M739 fuzes (point detonating) are used.
5/n
With the projectiles ready it is time to unload the charges. The charges propel the projectiles out of the barrel and towards the enemy. The M777 uses the Modular Artillery Charge System (MACS), which comes in two colors: green and white.
6/n
M231 (Green): 1 or 2 charges for distances between 3-13 km
M232A1 (White): 3, 4, or 5 charges for distances between 7-24 km (standard projectiles) 8-30 km (base bleed projectiles)
MACS is also compatible with the PzH 2000 and FH70, both of which Ukraine is receiving too.
7/n
What is still missing are the primers.
Here we have an enthusiastic Australian Army loader with 4x M232A1 charges and 7x M82 primers in his vest.
The M82 is a cartridge that when struck will ignite the charges. No primer = no fire.
8/n
Inserting each primer on its own would slow the gun crew down, so the primers are loaded into a magazine that sits at the back of the breech.
In the photo we see an unloaded magazine (with a blue stripe) 9/n
The M777 is in place, the projectiles are ready, the charges are laid out, the primers are loaded, time to sight the gun. First mount the optical sights, then adjust elevation and deflection to ensure the projectile hits we're it is intended to hit.
10/n
If you're using a proximity or time fuze then the projectile will detonate above ground, but only if you set the correct time or height.
Older fuzes were set by hand; modern fuzes by the PIAFS fuze setter (here used with M762 Electronic Time fuzes)
11/n
Time to make some noise!
First throw the projectile onto the loading tray, which which will be lowered and align the projectile with the barrel. Now ram the projectile into the barrel until it is stuck, so it doesn't slide back and so that there is room for the charges.
12/n
Time to load the charges.
Yell what charges you load and show the charges to the rest of the gun crew, because if you use too many or too few, the projectile will fall short or overshoot. If all is correct, then push the charges into the barrel.
13/n
If you load more than one charge - use the loading tray. If you load four or five charges - use a charge sleeve, place that on the loading tray, then push the charges in.
Don't forget to toss the charge sleeve theatrically away. 14/n
The loading tray is pushed back up and the charge loader closes the breech. Only he (!) is allowed to touch the breech mechanism, because when he loads the charges he sticks his hand into the barrel and if at that moment the breech comes down his hand is gone.
15/n
Almost there.
Once more the Gunner and Assistant Gunner check the gun's elevation and deflection, correct them if necessary, then report to the Gun Section Chief that everything is ready.
The charge loader is then ordered to push a lever to load a M82 primer.
16/n
And the soldier operating the loading tray will now hook up the lanyard.
Pulling the lanyard will strike the primer, which will ignite the charges, which will propel the projectile out of the gun.
17/n
And showtime!
Well trained US Army and Marine gun crews can fire one round every 12-14 seconds.
(Also: have a look at this gun's Gunner, who is already checking his sights for the next fire mission.) 18/n
Now that you know how a M777 works, check out this video of a US Army M777 gun crew quickly firing 8 rounds.
19/n
If I made an error or omitted a step - please excuse, I haven't been to Grafenwöhr for some years.
If there are questions: feel free to ask.
20/n
Until today I didn't know this myself: Marine crews consist of 10x cannoneers, so that two 5x men crews can be formed to operate the M777A2 for 24 hours per day (albeit with a reduced rate of fire).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
These are the 🇬🇧 UK's HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carriers.
First, as you can see in this picture, only one actually carries aircraft. The UK barely had enough money to buy the F-35B for one. For the other the Blairites expected the US Marine Corps 1/9
to provide the required aircraft, because the two carriers were bought so the Royal Navy could fight alongside the US Navy against China in the Pacific.
But the US does NOT want the British carriers anywhere near its carrier strike groups, because the UK carriers would slow
2/9
down a US carrier strike groups, as the UK did not have the money for nuclear propulsion.
And as the UK doesn't have the money for the ships that make up a carrier strike group (destroyers, frigates, submarines) the UK expected the US Navy to detach some of its destroyers and 3/9
🇬🇧 decline: Only one SSN is operational, three are no longer fit for service and got no crews. One carrier has no air wing and has been sent to rust away. The other carrier only has an air wing when the RAF cedes a third of its fighters. Only 1 destroyer is operational. The
1/5
frigates are falling apart. New Type 31 frigates won't get Mark 41 VLS or bow Sonar. The RAF took 48 of its Eurofighters apart, because it got no money for spares. The army has just 14 155mm howitzers. The Ajax vehicle is injuring the troops it carries. The Warrior IFVs are
2/5
outdated and falling apart. They amphibious ships are not deployable / crewed for lack of funds. The UK has not anti-ballistic missile system (e.g.Patriot). There is only money for 12 F-35A, the smallest F-35A order on the planet. The tank force is at its smallest since 1938.
3/5
International Law is worthless paper if you cannot and will not back it up with military power.
Dictators do not care for international law. But they fear the US Air Force. The moment the US signaled it would no longer back "international law" putin annexed Crimea and Assad
1/10
gassed his people. International Law is what defence laggards hide behind to not have to spend for their own security (hoping the US will save them from their irresponsibility) .
European politicians like to grandstand about "international law" but NO European nation has the
2/n
the means (nor the will) to the enforce it. European politicians grandstanding about international law always do so in the belief that the US will enforce their balderdash.
So European politicians lecturing the US about "international law" now are utter morons, because they
3/n
All this "NATO is unprepared for the use of drones like the war in Ukraine" is ridiculous, because:
• of course NATO is unprepared for the use of drones like the war IN (!) Ukraine,
• because that is not how a NATO-russia war will be fought. NATO, even just European NATO,
1/4
fields: 244 F-35, 403 Eurofighter, 183 Rafale, 177 modern F-16, 3 Gripen E, and 896 older fighter types.
A total of 1,906+ fighters (without the US Air Force and Royal Canadian Air Force; and with more new fighters entering European service every week).
russia, when counting
2/4
generously can't even put half that fighter strength into the field, and the 1,010 modern European NATO fighters would devastate russia's fighter force.
With NATO air supremacy comes absolute dominance of the battlefield. Every russian moving near the front would get bombed
3/4
Gripen fans keep hyping the Gripen with fake claims & as long as they do, I will counter them:
Scandinavian Air Force officer about the Gripen E: It can either be fully fueled or fully armed or flown from short runways. Never can 2 of these things be done at the same time.
1/25
The Gripen fans keep claiming that the Gripen has a better range than the F-35 and can fly from short runways... then admit that its max. range can only be achieved with external fuel tanks, which weigh so much that the Gripen E can no longer fly from short runways.
2/n
External fuel tanks also mean: the Gripen becomes slower, the radar cross section increases (making detection more likely), the fuel consumption increases,... and even with all 3 external fuel tanks the Gripen E carries 1,340 kg less fuel than the F-35A carries internally.
3/n
Gripen fans continue to spam my mention with claims how fantastic Sweden's Bas 90 and Gripen combination is... and that it would work for Canada's North too...
Ok, let's quickly compare Canada's three northern territories (Yukon, Northwest, Nunavut) and Sweden... ... 1/6
Land area:
🇸🇪 450,295 km2 (173,860 sq mi)
🇨🇦 terr.: 3,593,589 km2 (173,860 sq mi)
The land area of just the three territories (without Canada's 10 provinces) is already 8 times bigger than all of Sweden...
(In total Canada's land area is 9,984,670 km2
2/6
(3,855,100 sq mi) or 22 times Sweden).
Population:
🇸🇪 10.61 million
🇨🇦 terr.: 0.13 million
Sweden's population is 81.6 times bigger than that of the three territories... and if you look at population density:
🇸🇪 23,6/km2
🇨🇦 terr.: 0,013/km2
3/6