Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture
May 16, 2022 21 tweets 9 min read Read on X
I was asked how the M777 works.

A thread 🧵:

The M777 is a towed 155 mm howitzer with a gun crew of 8 soldiers or 10 marines.

1/n
There is a whole lot of battery and Battery Fire Direction Center (FDC) stuff that I will skip to focus on the operation of one M777.

When a fire mission is received a battery's M777 guns move to their firing positions.

2/n
Upon arrival half of a M777's crew emplaces the gun. Which means shovelling holes for the gun's spurs, raising the barrel, etc.
The less the gun moves after firing the faster the crew can fire the next projectile, so the spurs are buried deep in the earth.

3/n
Meanwhile the rest of crew prepares the projectiles. Projectiles are transported with a lifting plug instead of a fuze.
A crew only prepares the projectiles for the current fire mission. Nothing worse than having to remove a fuze when you want to escape counter battery fire.

4/n
Next step: unscrew the lifting plug and screw in the fuze.
There are a lot of fuzes: point detonating (super quick, delay) time (time, variable time), proximity, etc.
In this photo M739 fuzes (point detonating) are used.

5/n
With the projectiles ready it is time to unload the charges. The charges propel the projectiles out of the barrel and towards the enemy. The M777 uses the Modular Artillery Charge System (MACS), which comes in two colors: green and white.

6/n
M231 (Green): 1 or 2 charges for distances between 3-13 km
M232A1 (White): 3, 4, or 5 charges for distances between 7-24 km (standard projectiles) 8-30 km (base bleed projectiles)

MACS is also compatible with the PzH 2000 and FH70, both of which Ukraine is receiving too.

7/n
What is still missing are the primers.
Here we have an enthusiastic Australian Army loader with 4x M232A1 charges and 7x M82 primers in his vest.

The M82 is a cartridge that when struck will ignite the charges. No primer = no fire.

8/n
Inserting each primer on its own would slow the gun crew down, so the primers are loaded into a magazine that sits at the back of the breech.

In the photo we see an unloaded magazine (with a blue stripe)
9/n
The M777 is in place, the projectiles are ready, the charges are laid out, the primers are loaded, time to sight the gun. First mount the optical sights, then adjust elevation and deflection to ensure the projectile hits we're it is intended to hit.

10/n
If you're using a proximity or time fuze then the projectile will detonate above ground, but only if you set the correct time or height.
Older fuzes were set by hand; modern fuzes by the PIAFS fuze setter (here used with M762 Electronic Time fuzes)

11/n
Time to make some noise!

First throw the projectile onto the loading tray, which which will be lowered and align the projectile with the barrel. Now ram the projectile into the barrel until it is stuck, so it doesn't slide back and so that there is room for the charges.

12/n
Time to load the charges.

Yell what charges you load and show the charges to the rest of the gun crew, because if you use too many or too few, the projectile will fall short or overshoot. If all is correct, then push the charges into the barrel.

13/n
If you load more than one charge - use the loading tray. If you load four or five charges - use a charge sleeve, place that on the loading tray, then push the charges in.

Don't forget to toss the charge sleeve theatrically away.
14/n
The loading tray is pushed back up and the charge loader closes the breech. Only he (!) is allowed to touch the breech mechanism, because when he loads the charges he sticks his hand into the barrel and if at that moment the breech comes down his hand is gone.

15/n
Almost there.

Once more the Gunner and Assistant Gunner check the gun's elevation and deflection, correct them if necessary, then report to the Gun Section Chief that everything is ready.
The charge loader is then ordered to push a lever to load a M82 primer.

16/n
And the soldier operating the loading tray will now hook up the lanyard.

Pulling the lanyard will strike the primer, which will ignite the charges, which will propel the projectile out of the gun.

17/n
And showtime!

Well trained US Army and Marine gun crews can fire one round every 12-14 seconds.

(Also: have a look at this gun's Gunner, who is already checking his sights for the next fire mission.)
18/n
Now that you know how a M777 works, check out this video of a US Army M777 gun crew quickly firing 8 rounds.

19/n

If I made an error or omitted a step - please excuse, I haven't been to Grafenwöhr for some years.

If there are questions: feel free to ask.

20/n
Until today I didn't know this myself: Marine crews consist of 10x cannoneers, so that two 5x men crews can be formed to operate the M777A2 for 24 hours per day (albeit with a reduced rate of fire).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas C. Theiner

Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noclador

Mar 8
Please stop saying Europe should cancel weapons deals with the US.

Yes, we should not sign new weapon deals with the US; but canceling existing deals will hurt Ukraine and also Europe.

And there are 3 reasons for that. Let me explain.

1) Europe's armed forces have nearly
1/19 Image
0 spare equipment, as almost everything taken out of service over the last 35 years was either sold off or scrapped. Europe must continue to support Ukraine and therefore Europe needs to buy whatever weapons it can get it hands on to free up equipment to donate to Ukraine.
2/n Image
I.e. you can't demand that Belgium cancel its F-35A deal and demand that Belgium must donate its F-16 to Ukraine...
Norway, Denmark and the Netherlands could donate their F-16 to Ukraine, because they already received enough F-35A as replacement.
3/n Image
Read 19 tweets
Mar 5
I have to tell you when putin will attack next:

🇬🇧 @Keir_Starmer is NOT increasing defence spending this year.

🇬🇧 @Keir_Starmer is NOT increasing defence spending next year.

🇬🇧 @Keir_Starmer is increasing defence spending FROM (!) April 2027 by 0.2%.

This means that for
1/7
the next two years the British Armed Forces get nothing. They will remain as broken as they are.

The British Army has 78,000 troops of which just 18,000 are combat capable (the remaining 60,000 (= 77%) lack the materiel, training, equipment, etc. to be useful).
2/7
The situation is even worse for the Royal Navy.

Next year the British Armed Forces actually get even LESS money than this year (inflation is 10 times higher than GDP growth and so inflation cuts into the defence budget).

Then from April 2027 the situation will begin to
3/7
Read 7 tweets
Mar 2
Yesterday I posted a thread about American weapons and components in fighter aircraft and how Europe has to wean itself off them.

Today let's look at transport, tanker, maritime patrol, and airborne early warning aircraft.
(Tomorrow then trainer aircraft and drones)
1/25 Image
Transport aircraft come in two sizes: for strategic airlift or tactical airlift.
Simplified: strategic airlift transports materiel between continents and tactical airlift within a theater of operations.
For strategic airlift the choice for Europe is easy: A400M Atlas, because
2/n Image
it is the only strategic airlifter in production (C-17 Globemaster production ceased in 2015) and because the French were involved in its design the A400M Atlas comes with all key parts "Made in Europe".
Yes, it carries only half the payload of the C-17 Globemaster, but for
3/n Image
Read 25 tweets
Mar 1
Let's talk about American weapons and how Europe has to wean itself off them.
Part 1 of a long thread; this one looking at fighter jets.

First and foremost: Europe has to get all American made components out of all weapon systems produced in Europe. If Trump can shut down a
1/24 Image
European production line by withholding a component, then that component has to replaced... and if that is impossible, then that weapon system has no future and production has to end.
As for the F-35... Europe has nothing even close in combat capability. Best course will be
2/n Image
to see the existing deals through and then focus on acquiring Eurofighters and Rafales, both of which are way more capable than whatever junk russia sends up in the air.

The main issue will be that the Rafale's production line is running already at full capacity, while the
3/n Image
Read 24 tweets
Feb 25
The Gripen was designed by Sweden for Sweden's Bas 90 air base system and - truly - Sweden built the perfect fighter for Sweden's Bas 90 system... which resulted in a fighter no one but Sweden needs.

Bear with me as I explain a few things @Saab doesn't want you to know.
1/29 Image
Bas 90 was developed in the 1970s, when the Swedish Air Force was flying the Viggen (and some upgraded Draken). Bas 90 consisted of some 30+ reserve air bases with a 2,000+ metres (6,600+ ft) long main runway and 2-3 short runways of 800 metres (2,600 ft).
2/n Image
Here are the airbases of Kubbe (63°37'59.81"N 17°56'10.79"E) and Jokkmokk (66°29'48.43"N 20° 8'45.17") with the short runways highlighted in red.

Some of the short runways used public roads, but most were built specifically for the Bas 90 system in the 1980s.
3/n Image
Image
Read 29 tweets
Feb 22
I set out to create a table showing the reduction in British Infantry units between 1989 and 2025...

After doing Scotland, Wales and Yorkshire - I gave up.

For three reason:
a) the sheer size of it! The British Army had 100 infantry battalions in 1989 (not counting the
1/8 Image
nine battalions of the Ulster Defence Regiment).
b) the British Army's habit of reroling battalions every four years.
c) the disbanding of volunteer regiments in the early 1990s, then the merging of volunteer battalions into new volunteer regiments in the mid 1990s, and then
2/8
the disbanding of these new volunteer regiments some 5-6 years later, followed by the de-merging of some of the volunteer battalions.

In short: it was all very haphazard and chaotic!

So, instead here come the numbers about the British Army's infantry decline between 1989
3/8
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(