“A Good Man Goes to War” is very much about the idea that the Doctor probably shouldn’t be (or at least shouldn’t primarily be) an unstoppable universal force like “the Oncoming Storm.”
It’s something of a deconstruction of Davies’ post-Time War characterisation of the Doctor.
It’s very much a deconstruction of the angsty “darker and edgier” version of “Doctor Who” that could be seen to extend from having a protagonist who committed multiple premeditated genocides.
It drops him into a rape revenge narrative, and points out how that just doesn’t work.
It doesn’t work because he’s a children’s television character, and isn’t fit for purpose.
It’s deliberate how uncomfortable the Eleventh Doctor feels dealing with this stuff, and very pointed that his attempt to raise an army to solve a problem through force… doesn’t work.
It’s very overtly Moffat engaging with Davies’ work on #DoctorWho, and it’s very clearly drawn from the same impulse as rewriting the Time War in “The Day of the Doctor” or deconstructing the Doctor’s mindwipe of Donna in “Hell Bent.”
All of which is really great stuff.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An interesting aspect of the "Mission: Impossible" franchise compared to other big franchises is that it's not really about fighting advancing impersonal technology, which is even there in "Top Gun: Maverick."
It's very literally an old-school action hero fighting postmodernism.
Obviously that theme is the subtext of the modern "James Bond" franchise, but it's couched metaphors about drone warfare that makes Bond outdated - until he's not!
I love that the later "Mission: Impossible" movies are like, "Ethan is fighting the very idea of moral ambiguity."
I kind of admire that the big moral and dramatic stakes of these later "Mission: Impossible" movies are, "Just let Ethan Hunt be the kind of hero who does cool stunts and punches people in the face without burdening him with angst or ambiguity."
I am quite enjoying Christopher Cantwell and Cafu’s “Iron Man” run, in large part because it feels like a very clever exploration of what superheroes should be, as fictional archetypes.
(Iron Man #1.)
There’s a sense that this version of Tony Stark is quite exhausted by the sort of genre shifts that have taken root in American comics in the past few decades, where these characters are effectively demi-gods, and so wants to get back to basics.
(Iron Man #1.)
As somebody whose biggest issue with the MCU is its refusal to deal with these implications, and who loves plenty of comics that do, it’s kinda cool.
It’s nice to see a hero yearn for a return to the genre’s earlier lower-stakes days, played as mid-life crisis.
Not that he needs me to say it, but @SiddhantAdlakha is a gentleman and a scholar, and one of the finest critics to write about the Marvel Cinematic Universe from a place of knowledge and insight.
Also, it is frankly terrifying that @ign would consider replacing him as a reviewer on #Loki because he gave an opinion on the show that rabid Marvel fans didn’t like.
It’s a potentially chilling critical precedent. “Validate fans’ opinions, or else…!”
It’s weird how insecure fans get about these things.
There are plenty of my peers and people I respect who hold different opinions than I do.
However, I am secure enough in my opinion to know in my heart that “Demolition Man” is a true masterpiece of American cinema.
One of the most interesting things about "Suicide Squad" is the weird middle-ground that it occupies in terms of production.
It's a Marvel-style IP-driven project, but it was clearly designed as a Warner Bros. talent-drive production.
In that it's notable for re-teaming the talent that worked together on the quirky (and largely forgotten) con artist movie "Focus" from the previous year, Margot Robbie and Will Smith.
The idea is to put them both in a comic book movie, and hope that it'll work.
Just following on from that discussion of Zack Snyder’s “Justice League”, some thoughts that were too nerdy and esoteric for the article.
In terms of positioning “Justice League” as a reconstruction, it’s obvious even looking at the comics from which it draws.
“Batman v. Superman” drew very heavily from two of the biggest “dark age of comics” stories, and hinted at a third.
A lot of the Old Batman Versus Institutionally Challenged Superman stuff comes from Frank Miller’s “The Dark Knight Returns”, which ushered in “the dark age.”
The climax of the film is lifted directly from the mid-nineties event “The Death of Superman”, which involved - you guessed it - the death of Superman and the introduction of Doomsday.
It was the peak of the nineties “darker and edgier” era, and the height of comics speculation.