In a now-famous thread on Russian Army tires, @TrentTelenko highlighted problems that likely arose from failures in vehicle maintenance. That got me thinking: how does Russia store its vehicles and what does this imply for how many usable tanks it actually has? A (long) 🧵. /1
According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies "Military Balance", Russia has 2,800 tanks and 13,000 other armoured vehicles (reconnaissance and infantry fighting vehicles) in current use with another 10,000 tanks and 8,500 armoured vehicles in storage. /2
Stored vehicles can be mobilised and put on trains for transportation to wherever is needed. In the months leading up to the war in Ukraine, trains carrying tanks and other armoured vehicles were a frequent and highly visible sight across Russia. /3
However, the Russians have had major problems. @TrentTelenko highlighted evidence of tires bleeding oil because of poor maintenance, causing the abandonment of many Russian vehicles in the field and their capture by the Ukrainians. /4
There appear to have been many other breakdowns plaguing Russia's ability to fight. A recent video shows a BMP crew desperately trying to fire their jammed main gun in the midst of a Ukrainian attack which has already destroyed another Russian BMP. /5
Mechanical problems also plagued the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008. Repair crews had to be stationed every 15 mi (25 km) along the invasion route to deal with the volume of breakdowns. So this isn't a new problem. The Russians don't seem to have solved it yet. /6
Facing huge losses of equipment in Ukraine, Russia has mobilised stored vehicles. But here, too, the situation appears to be bad: according to Ukraine's military intelligence service, Russia's 4th Tank Division found that only 1 in 10 tanks mobilised from storage was usable. /7
Russia keeps its unused tanks in Bases for Storage and Repair of Weapons and Military Equipment (BHiRVT) and Central Tank Storage Bases (TsTRB). There were hundreds of such bases around Russia, but it aims to reduce the number to 24 large transshipment and logistics complexes. /8
Let's look at one of these large sites. This is the 227th military storage base in Ulan-Ude, Buryatiya (51.895771°N 107.528414°E). It's located alongside a railway line to enable easy transshipment of vehicles by rail. Many tanks now in Ukraine likely came from here. /9
Large numbers of vehicles are visible standing in the open air, in front of a number of storage sheds and workshops, which likely contain more vehicles and maintenance facilities. There's also an apparent tank graveyard. Russia grades storage facilities in four categories: /10
* light - stored in a heated space
* medium - stored in a closed unheated space
* hard - stored in the open under a canopy
* very hard - stored in the open in all climatic zones and under a canopy in industrial or maritime areas (where pollution and sea area is a problem). /11
What do these mean in practice? Here's some images to illustrate the different types of storage, from light through medium, hard and very hard. /12
Note that many of these vehicles are very old. Remember that figure of 10,000 tanks? It includes at least 2,800 T-55s, 2,500 T-62s, and 2,000 T-64s - all of which are obsolete. Some many be 60 or more years old and would stand no chance in a Ukraine-style conflict. /13
Remarkably, some WW2 T-34s are still stockpiled for use in Victory Day parades. Russia used T-62s in conflict as recently as Georgia in 2008, and in exercises as recently as 2018. Some T-62s are said to have gone to Syria to replace the Syrian government's war losses. /14
It's worth noting that the Russian climate is very unforgiving for mechanical equipment of all kinds. Recorded temperatures have ranged from 45C in summer to -71C in winter. Most regions get varying but usually significant amounts of precipitation year-round. /15
Let's compare this briefly to how the US does it. The biggest US tank storage depot is the Sierra Army Depot (SIAD) in Northern California, sited on 36,000 acres of desert 4,000 ft (1.2 km) above sea level. Its arid climate makes it ideal for long-term storage. /16
SIAD stores around 29,000 items of equipment, including some 2,000 M1A1 Abrams tanks - many of which are now likely to go to central and eastern Europe to replace Soviet-era equipment. The high desert climate helps to preserve the vehicles despite exposure to the open air. /17
Russia, like the US, has detailed manuals for vehicle maintenance. But it's a safe bet that sound maintenance practices have been neglected. In particular, it's likely that no maintenance at all was done for years in the aftermath of the Soviet collapse in the early 1990s. /18
The T-72s and T-80s currently in service are likely the product of decades of cannibalisation of parts from stored equipment. But maintenance also requires a steady supply of new parts, like batteries, which brings us to the biggest problem: rampant kleptocracy. /19
Military maintenance and supply contracts are prime targets for corruption everywhere. The US had its own massive scandal a few years ago with the "Fat Leonard" case, when contractor Leonard Francis bilked the US Navy of tens of millions of dollars. /20
Russia has an all-pervasive culture of theft and corruption. In January 2022, Col Evgeny Pustovoy, head of the procurement department for armoured vehicles, was accused of stealing $13m through fake contracts for batteries. He is currently awaiting trial. /21
In March 2022, Ukraine reported that stored tanks transported to a Russian maintenance base near the Ukrainian border arrived in an unusable condition, stripped of valuable optics and electronics containing high-value metals. Some did not even have engines. /22
Such looting is very likely rife in isolated, poorly-supervised storage bases which are often located in poor regions and inadequately guarded against thieves. Other forms of corner-cutting are highly likely too, particularly if money can be skimmed in the process. /23
For instance, if stored tanks are only needed for a few weeks a year to participate in highly scripted exercises, why spend time and money maintaining them for the other 11 months? It's not like they'll be needed to fight a war! ... Oops. /24
This sheds a sobering light on Russia's war losses. According to Ukraine, Russia has lost 1,254 tanks since 24 Feb. Now consider that the IISS reports that Russia has 2,800 tanks in service. Where are the replacements to come from? /25
I think it's likely that the vast majority of the 10,000 tanks in storage are either unusable or so obsolete that they would be (even more of) death traps in Ukraine. If the Ukrainian and IISS figures are correct, Russia may have lost nearly 45% of its usable tank force. /26
There may well be scope for further cannibalisation of stored tanks and mobilisation of more older tanks. The nature of Russia's losses seem to be changing, perhaps reflecting this. Its losses in the first weeks of the war were concentrated among its most modern tanks. /27
For instance, modernised T-72B3-Obr2016 made up about 20% of Russia's active fleet but reportedly accounted for about 35% of its tank losses in the first weeks. Recently reported losses have reportedly been concentrated among much older models. /28
In short, Russia's tank capabilities are likely significantly degraded already. Its gigantic tank losses are likely to become a critical problem by the late summer if high loss rates persist (and I can't see why they shouldn't). /29
And because Russia can't build new tanks fast enough and its remaining stored tanks are likely mostly useless, a crunch point is coming. How much longer can it continue to throw tanks at the Ukrainians? /end
1/ The occupied Donbas is a garbage-filled, dysfunctional, and corrupt region infested by packs of man-eating dogs, according to a Russian warblogger. In a remarkable display of cognitive dissonance, she blames Ukraine and says that Russia is only in nominal control. ⬇️
2/ Journalist and warblogger Anastasia Kashevarova, who has frequently campaigned to improve the situation of Russian soldiers fighting in Ukraine, has posted a long denunciation of the situation in the Luhansk and Donetsk regions, partly under Russian control since 2014.
3/ She asks: "Has Russia entered Donbas?"
"Russia has been repeatedly accused of occupying Donbas and Crimea, but let's finally figure out whether Russia is actually in Donbas. I, like the people of Donbas, are still waiting for Russia to finally enter and rule.
1/ A Russian soldier with a mental disability says that he was imprisoned in an open-air pit for 54 days to force him to join a stormtrooper squad. His experience highlights the Russian army's increasing use of men with disabling mental conditions as frontline troops. ⬇️
2/ Oleg Gennadievich Kalmykov of the 15th Motorised Rifle Regiment (military unit 31134) has recorded a video recounting how he was imprisoned for nearly two months in a zindan, a pit in the ground sealed with iron bars but otherwise open to the elements.
3/ Kalmykov says that his previous and current regiments are trying to override a diagnosis by military psychologists that he should be employed only in the rear area with no access to weapons, because he has an emotionally unstable personality disorder:
1/ A wounded Russian soldier was buried up to his neck in a so-called "tight pit" to 'remotivate' him to go on an assault. In a video, the man names his commanders, whom he says are running an extortion racket, and appeals for help from the military authorities. ⬇️
2/ The man complains: "They buried me in a pit for refusing to go and die on a combat mission, for a simple, stupid task where I could have died, they put me in a pit."
His cap reads: "To be a soldier means to live forever."
3/ The man is reported to be from the 1st Company of the 1st Battalion of the 108th Guards Airborne Assault Regiment (military unit 42091). He says that he had to refuse to go on a combat mission because of fragmentation injuries to his back.
1/ Russian soldiers are once again finding themselves being targeted by the hated military police for petty offences, including "driving with dirty tires" in the middle of the muddy season in Ukraine. "Are we fighting or just wanking?" asks one aggrieved soldier-blogger. ⬇️
2/ The military police have been the subject of complaints for years due to their rampant corruption, violent treatment of soldiers and generally obstructive attitudes.
3/ A fresh wave of shakedowns has been reported from the Russian rear areas in Ukraine, with soldiers being detained and sent to their likely deaths in stormtrooper squads as punishment for petty offences. 'Vault No. 8', a serving soldier and warblogger, reports:
1/ Eleven Dutch parties across the political spectrum from socialist to conservative have issued a joint appeal to a provincial government to build a memorial to Black American soldiers who died in World War II, to replace one removed from the Netherlands American Cemetery. ⬇️
2/ The Dutch newspaper NRC reported earlier that a memorial to African-American soldiers who had fought to liberate the Netherlands and built the cemetery in Margraten, South Limburg, had been removed following a complaint by the Heritage Foundation.
3/ The removal was strongly criticised by local historians, researchers and politicians, who had campaigned for years for the US government to publicly recognise the contribution of black Americans to the liberation of the Netherlands in 1944-45.
1/ Shooting down drones on the battlefield requires a wide variety of weapons, used in a layered defence, according to a commentary by Russian soldier and warblogger 'Vault 8'. The lessons he suggests likely apply to both sides in the current war. ⬇️
2/ 'Vault 8' has produced "a brief analysis of the use of various weapons against enemy [Ukrainian] drones by our anti-aircraft gunners":
3/ "1) Countering FPV kamikazes.
A combination of electronic warfare and small arms works. Electronic warfare as a passive defense of points and vehicles is primarily static. Small arms are used both from static air defence sites and in mobile hunting groups.