Artillery, especially rocket artillery, requires a lot of transport and logistic capacity. Good militaries plan ahead to ensure munitions flow efficiently from factory to front.
But russia's military isn't a good military.
1/n
First let's go back in time to WWII:
In WWII artillery ammo came in wooden crates. Be it the US Army (color photo) or Red Army (b&w photo) - lots and lots of crates. Each crate had to be unloaded by hand, stacked by hand, loaded on trucks by hand.
Slow, tedious work.
2/n
And yes, you guessed that right: russian ammunition still comes in wooden crates.
Here we see a 152 mm projectile and the cartridge holding the charges in their crate. Lovely carpentry work... but dreadful to transport.
3/n
And I am sure you guessed this too: yes, russian troops still have to load and then unload each crate by hand, stack them by hand, then load them on trucks by hand, unload them again by hand...
4/n
And when you unpack crates you get:
• projectiles with fixed fuzes. Need to use a different fuze? You can't. If you didn't grab the right crate at the logistic point you're stuck now.
• cartridges holding a fixed charge. Need less or more charge? You can't.
5/n
The russians even pack their Grad rockets in wooden crates... 42 wooden crates for one Grad launcher load... and each 80-85 kg Grad missile has to be loaded by hand.
6/n
But the absolute pinnacle of russian engineering is how Uragan and Smerch missiles are transport: 4x respectively 2x missiles in a metal cage, but
7/n
neither Uragan and Smerch can reload on its own. Both need specific reloading vehicles. No reloading vehicle = the Uragan and Smerch are useless.
Naturally the two reloading vehicles are not compatible and each missile needs to be reloaded on its own.
8/n
What about the TOS-1 flamethrower? That's a modern vehicle for sure... nope: 2x missiles in a metal cage, a dedicated reload vehicle and every missile needs to be pushed in separately... by hand.
9/n
Now let's look at Western armies... where all artillery ammo comes on pallets.
• projectiles - on pallets
• charges - on pallets
• fuzes and primers - on pallets
because Western armies have a secret tool, the knowledge of which has never reach russia. 10/n
That tool is the forklift.
NATO armies: 24x projectiles on a pallet + 1x forklift
russian army: 24x projectiles = 24 crates
The forklift is done in a minute, the russians in 30 minutes.
11/n
And Western armies unload 35x charges and 24x projectiles in 2 minutes thanks to trucks with cranes.
Everything that leaves Western munitions factories is packaged in the most easy way to handle for logistic troops.
12/n
And if you're in a hurry to supply a battery - well as you can see a standard NATO truck can unload the entire ammo supply for a battery in one go and in under a minute.
13/n
And when it comes to Western rocket artillery - again: everything has been optimized for speed and efficiency.
A supply truck lowers a rocket pod with 6x rockets on the ground and a HIMARS or M270 with their build in cranes pick the pod up and reload on their own.
14/n
Reloading rockets is a breeze for NATO armies... while for russian troops it is a continuous clusterfuck.
Flawless logistics is the difference between a military that wants to win, and a clown show, which only exists to parade once a year before the dear leader.
15/n
With Western weapons Ukraine also receives Western logistics standards. This will further improve Ukraine's capabilities, especially on the offensive.
And on the offensive Ukraine will go as soon as HIMARS and Patriot arrive in Ukraine.
16/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gripen fans continue to spam my mention with claims how fantastic Sweden's Bas 90 and Gripen combination is... and that it would work for Canada's North too...
Ok, let's quickly compare Canada's three northern territories (Yukon, Northwest, Nunavut) and Sweden... ... 1/6
Land area:
🇸🇪 450,295 km2 (173,860 sq mi)
🇨🇦 terr.: 3,593,589 km2 (173,860 sq mi)
The land area of just the three territories (without Canada's 10 provinces) is already 8 times bigger than all of Sweden...
(In total Canada's land area is 9,984,670 km2
2/6
(3,855,100 sq mi) or 22 times Sweden).
Population:
🇸🇪 10.61 million
🇨🇦 terr.: 0.13 million
Sweden's population is 81.6 times bigger than that of the three territories... and if you look at population density:
🇸🇪 23,6/km2
🇨🇦 terr.: 0,013/km2
3/6
Saab loooves to tout the claim that the Gripen can "operate from dispersed air bases".
They do that, because they know no one of you knows what it means. And every time I see someone regurgite "dispersed air bases" (or "road runways" or "short runways") I know I am dealing
1/36
with someone, who knows absolutely nothing about the topic.
So allow me to take you on a deep dive into what "operating from dispersed air bases" actually means.
Let's start with Såtenäs Air Base in Southern Sweden - the most important Swedish air base. 2/n
When the Viggen entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
When the Gripen entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
When the Gripen E entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
In the 1950s Sweden developed the Bas 60 system, which would have dispersed the Swedish 3/n
The 11th Airborne Division is the least likely to be used to invade #Greenland.
The division's deputy commander is Canadian. He is responsible for Operations. The 11th would have to arrest part of their own officers, before being able to plan a Greenland invasion.
Also
1/6
there are just 8 C-17 Globemaster aircraft at Elmendorf Air Force Base. The USAF would need to fly a dozen more up to Alaska, which of course Canada would notice. Then to reach Greenland the C-17 would have to cross Canada's North, which NORAD's Canadian officers would report
2/6
to the Canadian and Danish governments.
It is much more likely the US will inform allies that a brigade of the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg will fly to the Middle East, which means the air route will take them right over Greenland. And at Fort Bragg you also have the
3/6
This is a typical clown tweet by someone, who knows nothing about WWII.
3 years before D-Day, the Soviets & nazis were in a love-feast, while the US had not entered the war; & when it did it had to cross an ocean full of nazi submarines to stage troops & materiel for D-Day.
1/14
And unlike the warmongering Soviets, which in June 1941 fielded 304 divisions, the US Army fielded just 37 divisions when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor (+ two Marine Corps divisions).
Before any D-Day the US Army had to start forming new divisions (38 in 1942 and 17 in 1943) &
2/n
then ship those divisions across the Atlantic, which was teeming with German subs, while the Soviets just used trains to bring troops and materiel to the front (& if the Soviet had had to ship troops across an ocean, they would have just accepted that a third of their troops
3/n
The @RoyalAirForce - once the strongest air force in Western Europe... but now...
7 Eurofighter Typhoon squadrons are expected to fulfill the tasks, for which 35 years ago the RAF fielded 40 squadrons (31 active & 4 reserve + 5 shadow squadrons, which would have been formed
1/27
from the personnel & fighters of the RAF's operational conversion units).
At the end of the Cold War these 40 squadrons were assigned to 4 commands, each with a specific mission & enough aircraft to fulfill their mission.
No. 1 Group was tasked with striking Soviet forces
2/27
in Northern Germany, including with WE.177 tactical nukes.
The Group fielded 8 active, 4 reserve and 2 shadow squadrons, which flew Tornado GR1, Jaguar GR1A, and Harrier GR5 fighters (the reserve squadrons flew Hawk T1A). The group also included the RAF's 3 aerial
3/27
Since there are still people claiming the Gripen is the "ideal fighter for Canada"... here are the refueling stops the Gripen C/D needed to get from Ronneby in Sweden to Eielson Air Base in Alaska.
So of course this is an "ideal fighter" for Canada... as it will have to stop 1/5
at every Canadian airfield to refuel...
For the curious ones:
On 13 July 2006 five Gripen C and two Gripen D left
their base in Ronneby Sweden. They refueled at RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland, then flew to NAS Keflavik in Iceland, where they refueled and stayed overnight.
2/5
On 14 July the Gripens flew to Sondre Stromfjord in Greenland for another refueling, then proceeded to RCAF Iqualuit in Canada for refueling and the night.
On 15 July the Gripens flew to Churchill, refuelled and then flew to RCAF Cold Lake, where they spent 16 July to rest.
3/5