Trung Phan Profile picture
May 21, 2022 18 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Citicorp Center was built in 1977.

Located in NY, it was the world's 7th tallest building but had a big structural flaw: a very strong storm wind could knock it over.

The expert architects had no idea, until an anonymous Princeton undergrad cold called them.

Here’s the story🧵 Image
Today, the 59-story structure is called 601 Lexington Avenue.

The tower was originally built to house Citibank's headquarters and construction ran from 1974 to 1977 (it cost $175m and was later called Citigroup Center).

The 45-degree roof is a stand out in Manhattan's skyline. Image
The Citicorp engineering flaw starts at the base: the first 9 floors are built on stilts.

Why? St. Peter's Lutheran Church sits on the corner of the lot. The church refused to leave but agreed to renovations.

So architects used stilts to build Citi over a newly designed church. Image
The stilts were built in the middle of the building (to avoid the church), which created instability.

A team lead by famed structural engineer William LeMessurier had a solution: V-shaped chevrons (8-storys high) on the building frame that transferred floor loads to the centre. Image
However, the V-shaped chevrons created another issue: Citi's structure was very light vs. a normal skyscraper.

And strong winds made the building sway.

LeMessurier's 2nd solution: a 400-ton tuned mass damper that vibrates to reduce sway (it requires electricity, though).
In skyscraper construction, there are two types of wind to account for:

◻️PERPENDICULAR: Wind hits the face of a building
◻️QUARTERING: Wind hits the corners of a building

"Normal" skyscrapers are strongest at the corners. Citi was not normal and vulnerable to quartering winds. Image
LeMessurier modelled for perpendicular but *not* quartering winds...until an anonymous Princeton undergraduate called his firm's office in 1978.

The architecture student was researching Citi for a thesis paper and flagged the quartering wind issue.

The analysis was spot on. Image
With the info, LeMessurier and his team calculated that a storm with quartering winds strong enough to knock Citi over happens once every 55yrs.

BUT, that's only if the 400-ton damper works. If a storm cuts power, than a weaker storm -- that happens every 16yr -- could hit Citi. ImageImageImage
There was a fix.

The tower's joints were originally bolted together. A process that is fine for a "normal" building but a big problem for Citicorp.

LeMessurier proposed welding steel plates over the bolted joints. It would cost $8m but insurance only covered $2m. Image
The fix needed to happen ASAP.

The hypothetical of a storm turned into a reality when a Category 4 hurricane (Ella) began forming on the East Coast in August 1978.

If it made landfall on New York and toppled Citi Tower, tens of thousands of lives were at risk. Image
LeMessurier pushed Citi to act fast and found an ally: one Citi EVP was MIT-trained engineer (John S. Reed).

Together they convinced the Board to take action and made a plan to covertly execute the welding.

NYPD and 2.5k Red Cross volunteers were put on standby for evacuation.
Over many weeks, a team of engineers welded in the evenings and throughout the early AMs.

The covert operation was never uncovered in large part because a number of newspapers (including the NYT) were dealing with worker strikes.

Luckily, Hurricane Ella never came. Image
For years, the public was oblivious to the Citicorp story.

That changed in 1995 when a New Yorker writer overheard the tale at a dinner party and interviewed LeMessurier for the piece.

One mystery remained: who was the Princeton student that contact LeMessurier's office? Image
In the early 2000s, BBC aired a show on Citicorp. A woman named Diane Hartley watched and realized the Princeton student that cracked the case was...her.

She never spoke directly w/ LeMessurier but the insight when she was a 21-year old student saved countless lives. Incredible. Image
If you enjoyed that, I write interesting threads like this 1-2x a week.

Follow @TrungTPhan to catch them in your feed.

Here's another one:
I also write a Saturday newsletter on business, tech, media and memes that you may enjoy: trungphan.substack.com
Sources

TED Ed:

By Building Design: bybuildingdesign.com/blog/tag/skysc…

New Yorker article: people.duke.edu/~hpgavin/cee42…

And the absolute must-listen podcast on the topic from @99piorg, which includes an interview with Diane Hartley:open.spotify.com/episode/6s6SaQ…
Two quick notes:

◻️The first tweet should read "architects AND engineers" (I didn't mean to call out only architects as everyone involved with building Citicorp missed the quartering issue)
◻️Here is the cover of @DianeHartley thesis paper

🔗99percentinvisible.org/episode/struct… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trung Phan

Trung Phan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrungTPhan

Sep 19
PayPal’s bland logo redesign was inevitable
Image
If you are the person that did the un-aligned letters for the previous eBay logo, please contact the research app team. We are huge fans of how un-aligned the “e” is with the “y”.Bearly.AI
This article offers up reasons for popularity of simple font logos (mostly Sans Serif):

— Easier to standardize ads across mediums
— Improves readability (especially on mobile)
— The “brand” matters more than the logo velvetshark.com/why-do-brands-…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 1
Berkshire Hathaway board member Chris Davis once asked Charlie Munger why Costco didn’t drop the membership card.

Let anyone shop and raise prices by 2% (still great value), thus making up for lost membership fees (and more).

Munger said the card is important filter:

▫️“Think about who you’re keeping out [with a membership card]. Think about the cohort that won’t give you their license and their ID and get their picture taken.

Or they aren’t organized enough to do it, or they can’t do the math to realize [the value]…that cohort will have a 100% of your shoplifters and a 100% of your thieves. Now, it’ll also have most of your small tickets.

And that cohort relative to the US population will probably be shrinking as a % of GDP relative to the people that can do the math [on Costco’s value].”▫️

I have a membership but have been guffing on the math for a few years tbh. They keep telling me to upgrade from Gold to Business but I’m too lazy (even if the 2-3% Cash Back on Business pays back after a few trips).

This is a long way of saying Costco’s membership price hike effective today — its first in 7 years — is annoying but when I decide to do the math in a few months, it’ll be worth it.

***

Chris Davis’ remarks from this episode of The Knowledge Project: open.spotify.com/episode/6fJYHF…Image
Anyway, here is something I wrote about Costco’s $9B+ clothing business my affinity for Kirkland-branded socks and Puma gym shirts. readtrung.com/p/costcos-9b-c…
Two notes:

▫️Meant “Executive” (not “Business”) membership
▫️Chris Davis was doing a pure thought experiment. Costco membership obvi high margin (on~$5B a year) and accounts for majority of Costco profits. Retail margin is tiny on ~$230B of annual sales (Costco would need like another $150B+ from letting anyone shop to make up membership profits)Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 15
One of the Team USA rowers who won a Gold Medal is an investment banker and actually did the “B2B SaaS Sales” joke on Linkedin. Legend. Image
Here’s the rest of the post (perfectly formatted to show up in the feed as a shitpost): linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…
Image
Justin if you’re reading this and are available for consulting, the research app team would love to engage your B2B SaaS knowledge for our Q4 sales roadmapBearly.AI
Read 4 tweets
Aug 7
Explainer video on science of why the 400m sprint is considered the most painful track & field event.

And why “no person on the planet can run the 400m all out from start to finish".

The race pushes the way the body creates energy to the limit:

▫️0-50 meters: ATP-CP (energy system for very short and explosive movements; used up after 5-10 seconds)

▫️50-200 meters: Anaerobic glycolysis (burns glucose without oxygen, leading to lactic acid buildup and muscle fatigue)

▫️200-300 meters: Aerobic energy (uses oxygen to break down glucose, but cannot keep up with the demand)

▫️300-400 meters: Anaerobic energy reserves tapped while aerobic energy is too slow to fill the gaps (lactic acid buildup is going HAM)

Track athletes can pace for longer distances and shorter ones are just over quicker (obvs).

The Olympic record is a blazing 43:03, set by South African runner Wayde van Niekerk in 2016 (and 2024 Final race is tomorrow).

***

Full video from Outperform:
Usain Bolt ran the 400m early in career but then said training was “too hard”.

The 400m Hurdles is a world of pain too for similar reasons — Vox has a good vid on it:

Here is a great breakdown of Wayde van Niekerk’s record run:

Image
The 400m is also tough because you don’t get the benefit of an absolute baller like Bottle Klaus keeping hydrated
Read 5 tweets
Jul 20
The amount of work Hayao Miyazaki and Studio Ghibli team put into a film is mind-boggling.

Each typically has 60k-70k frames, all hand-drawn and painted with water color.

This 4-second clip (“The Wind Rises”) took one animator 15 months to do. Insane.
The docu “10 Years with Hayao Miyazaki” shows him talking to the animator (Eiji Yamamori) after its done.

It’s so good:

Miyazaki: “Good job.”
Yamamori: “It’s so short, though”
Miyazaki: “But it was worth it.”

The animator gets a second of joy (he’s pumped) but on to the next.
Miyazaki doesn’t use digital FX or computer graphics. He believes “that the tool of an animator is the pencil.”

On a related note, here’s something I wrote about another Japanese legend dedicated to the craft (Ichiro Suzuki) and the art of mastery: readtrung.com/p/jerry-seinfe…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 9
New York City paid Mckinsey $4m to conduct a feasibility study on whether trash bins are better than leaving garbage on the street.

The deck is 95-slides long and titled “The Future of Trash”.

Some highlights:

▫️The official term is “containerization”, which is the “storage of waste in sealed, rodent-proof receptacles rather than in plastic bags placed directly on the curb.”

▫️Two main types of containerization: 1) individual bins for low density locales; 2) shared containers for high-density.

▫️NYC needs to clean up 24,000,000lbs of garbage a day

▫️Containerization has only become the norm worldwide in major cities in the past 15 years.

▫️New York City first considered containerization in the 1970s but never conducted a feasibility study until now (Mckinsey’s sales team has been dropping the ball)

▫️Key considerations for container viability:

• POPULATION DENSITY: NYC has 30k residents per square mile (more dense than comparable big cities)

• BUILT ENVIRONMENT: Few places to “hide” containers due to history of infrastructure development.

• WEATHER: Snow creates challenges for “mechanized collection” in the winter.

• CURB SPACE: Mostly taken up by bus stops, bike lanes, outdoor dining and fire hydrants.

• COLLECTION FREQUENCY: NYC needs to double frequency of pick-up for estimated speed of trash that bins would accumulate.

• FLEET: A new garbage truck will needs to be designed to collect rolling bins at scale.

▫️ The proposed solution (literally garbage bins and shared containers) covers 89% of NYC streets and 77% of residential tonnage.

▫️The three case studies — because you gotta have solid case studies — are Amsterdam, Paris and Barcelona.

▫️There is a slide called “Why containerization matters” and three reasons are “rats”, “pedestrian obstruction” and “dirty streets” (the 21-year intern that did this slide billed at prob $10k an hour is my hero).

The study is actually pretty interesting.

I have no idea if $4m is a rip-off to learn that “yeah, we should put garbage in bins so rats don’t eat it” but I would have happily done it for 10-20% of that budget (and come to a similar conclusion).Image
Image
Image
Image
It is actually an interesting deck. Just the thought of a 20-year old newly grad getting billed at an obscene rate to say”rats get to garbage” is kinda funny

Four more solid slides:
— By the numbers (daily garbage = 140 Statue of Liberty a day!!)
— City comparison
— Container comparison (looks like they did select the “scalable” trash bin)
— Curb side analysis

Full deck here: dsny.cityofnewyork.us/wp-content/upl…Image
Image
Image
Image
Think Mckinsey telling NY to “put garbage in bins so rats don’t eat it and people can walk” will work out better than when it told AT&T in 1981 that cellphones would be “niche.”

That cost AT&T $13B and one worst business predictions ever as I wrote here: readtrung.com/p/the-worst-te…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(