2) At the apex of the special counsel cover-up operation, Andrew Weissman released the Carter Page FISA application, using the ridiculous justification of a FOIA request.
Everyone was so intoxicated by the first ever release of a TSCI FISA, they never paused to ask the question.
However, the answer reveals just how brutally corrupt the special counsel cover up operation was.
4) The FISA application was released, because it was the central focus of the James Wolfe criminal indictment.
Senate Intel Committee Security Director James Wolfe was busted leaking material from SSCI SCIF. Wolfe leaked the FISA application to journalist Ali Watkins.
5) The Wolfe leak of the FISA application was a very serious problem for both the special counsel and the SSCI.
So, before the DC US Attorney could put those charges into the official court record, Weissman found out and publicly released it.
6) Thereby the special counsel proactively undermined any criminal charge that would be levied against Mr. Wolfe, and subsequently, importantly, protected the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
7) Why did the Special Counsel need to protect James Wolfe from the consequences of his leaking the Carter Page FISA application?
8) Because James Wolfe was told to leak the Top Secret Classified FISA application by Senate Committee Vice-Chairman, Senator Mark Warner.
9) Why did Senator Mark Warner originally tell James Wolfe to leak the Carter Page FISA application to Ali Watkins?
10) ANSWER: Because SSCI Vice-Chairman Warner was trying desperately to get enough pressure in DC to appoint a special counsel.
The leak took place on March 17, 2017, amid the DC furor to get a Trump-Russia special counsel at all costs.
11) The special counsel was appointed, in part, due to the public pressure created by the open admission of an internal FBI investigation of President Trump, which *importantly* at the time of the leak (3/17/17), was still being denied.
12) It wasn't until (conveniently & not coincidentally) three days later on March 20, 2017, when FBI Director James Comey admitted before congress that yes, President Trump was actually under an open FBI investigation.
13) Fast forward to late 2017, early 2018, and the Wolfe FISA leak is now part of a criminal investigation and criminal indictment (unsealed June 7, 2018)
14) As soon as the Wolfe indictment was unsealed, the special counsel jumped into action to remove the most explosive element, the FISA leak, from any potential courtroom.
15) The fear was Wolfe wasn't about to go to prison for leaking a document he was told to leak.
The ramifications were tremendous for everyone, including the special counsel.
The revelation of a coordinated multi-branch effort to target Trump would crush the Weissman agenda.
16) Wolfe's lawyers knew how to leverage the fear within DC to get the best outcome for their client.
17) Cunning Weissman knew by publicly releasing the FISA application, using the goofy and easily dismissible justification of a FOIA request, he could remove that element from the criminal case.
Which is exactly what happened. 👇👇
18) With that charge removed, the corrupt politicians within the Senate Intel Commitee, who were part of the Trump targeting operation, then used their power to protect the guy they used to conduct their leak operation.
19) The defense lawyers then leveraged the power of the SSCI co-conspirators to the benefit of their client.
20) And that my friends, is the reason why the top secret classified Carter Page FISA application was publicly released in July of 2018.
Now do you see how corrupt and enmeshed the special counsel operation really was?
/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) You see, when Mueller was appointed in May of 2017 he didn't start with a fresh crew of people. Not even close.
Mueller/Weissmann started with the exact same FBI investigators who were involved with Michael Sussmann and Rodney Joffe, and Fusion, and the Clinton campaign.
3) That Mueller investigative team, who stepped into the picture in 2017, included FBI agent Peter Strzok, who said from the outset "there's no big there there," to Lisa Page. May 19, 2017:
We should be specific on this. Yes, NATO Supreme Allied Commander James Stavridis carried out the military attacks; however, it was Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power, Susan Rice and French President Sarkozy who led the effort. Eventually a shoulder shrugging Obama said meh, whatevs
And for those catching up, you'll note that Libya was not fighting with any NATO country, so the premise of NATO intervening was not there. Hence Samantha had to sell the R2P theory (responsibility to protect).
Overlay that NATO justification, follow the continuum...
.... notice that again in 2022 we have the State Dept and CIA triggering a war, just like Libya.... and you find yourself watching NATO and wait for it,... Ukraine.
(2) The FBI lawyer (Lisa Page) in charge of vetting the provenance of the fraudulent material from Clinton (via Sussmann), retains legal services from the wife of the Judge now determining whether the provenance was accurately disclosed by Sussmann.
(3) Everyone knows the FBI was aware the Sussmann material (Trump-Russia fabrications) came from Clinton's campaign.
Lisa Page knew the material she reviewed came from Hillary Clinton.
However, everyone in the FBI has to pretend they didn't know, or else they're in deep shit.
1. On the inflation data. The BLS captured the price data mid-April, when there was a brief drop in gasoline price. Because the BLS weights the gas price 5x, the price data showed -6.1% for gasoline. That skewed the topline downward to only 0.3% for April. LOOK👇
2. Since that price capture took place, gasoline prices have again increased much higher.
3. The Biden $1.9 trillion COVID spending package that created $1,400 checks for Americans, passed in March 2021. That massive infusion of cash took place in April of 2021. We are now cycling through the year-over-year comparisons when artificial economic stimulus took place.
(1) The FBI is the codependent agency for Antifa. (2) Homeland Security (DHS) is run by U.S. Intel agencies under the umbrella of the ODNI office. (3) Nina Jankowicz works for U.S. Intelligence. (4) "Disinformation" is information adverse to the interests of U.S. Intel.
(5) Big tech social media companies operate on joint access databases of the U.S. govt. (6) As a result of #5, tech data processing costs are essentially subsidized. (7) FB, Insta, YouTube, MS, Google, and all tech platforms operating on AWS are connected to intel.
(8) Twitter as a private company is adverse to this preestablished relationship. (9) ODNI office as well as DHS, DOJ and FBI domestically have self-interest in blocking Musk. (10) Starlink presents problem for pre-established ISP control nodes for internet traffic surveillance.
Zimmerman was, in many ways, a sort of beta test for Obama's ability to sway media. Chicago didn't know the scale of media willingness to adhere to the small group, so they accused a transparently innocent man to see how far that influence circle extended.
Prior to "if I had a son", the activist era always used media to change public sympathies and excuse the transparently guilty.
Zimmerman was a mirroring inflection point. Media used to change public sympathies by accusing the transparently innocent.
From that moment forward, every political accusation you are familiar with, and the media exploitation to support that political accusation, has stemmed from using media to accuse the innocent.