2) At the apex of the special counsel cover-up operation, Andrew Weissman released the Carter Page FISA application, using the ridiculous justification of a FOIA request.
Everyone was so intoxicated by the first ever release of a TSCI FISA, they never paused to ask the question.
However, the answer reveals just how brutally corrupt the special counsel cover up operation was.
4) The FISA application was released, because it was the central focus of the James Wolfe criminal indictment.
Senate Intel Committee Security Director James Wolfe was busted leaking material from SSCI SCIF. Wolfe leaked the FISA application to journalist Ali Watkins.
5) The Wolfe leak of the FISA application was a very serious problem for both the special counsel and the SSCI.
So, before the DC US Attorney could put those charges into the official court record, Weissman found out and publicly released it.
6) Thereby the special counsel proactively undermined any criminal charge that would be levied against Mr. Wolfe, and subsequently, importantly, protected the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
7) Why did the Special Counsel need to protect James Wolfe from the consequences of his leaking the Carter Page FISA application?
8) Because James Wolfe was told to leak the Top Secret Classified FISA application by Senate Committee Vice-Chairman, Senator Mark Warner.
9) Why did Senator Mark Warner originally tell James Wolfe to leak the Carter Page FISA application to Ali Watkins?
10) ANSWER: Because SSCI Vice-Chairman Warner was trying desperately to get enough pressure in DC to appoint a special counsel.
The leak took place on March 17, 2017, amid the DC furor to get a Trump-Russia special counsel at all costs.
11) The special counsel was appointed, in part, due to the public pressure created by the open admission of an internal FBI investigation of President Trump, which *importantly* at the time of the leak (3/17/17), was still being denied.
12) It wasn't until (conveniently & not coincidentally) three days later on March 20, 2017, when FBI Director James Comey admitted before congress that yes, President Trump was actually under an open FBI investigation.
13) Fast forward to late 2017, early 2018, and the Wolfe FISA leak is now part of a criminal investigation and criminal indictment (unsealed June 7, 2018)
14) As soon as the Wolfe indictment was unsealed, the special counsel jumped into action to remove the most explosive element, the FISA leak, from any potential courtroom.
15) The fear was Wolfe wasn't about to go to prison for leaking a document he was told to leak.
The ramifications were tremendous for everyone, including the special counsel.
The revelation of a coordinated multi-branch effort to target Trump would crush the Weissman agenda.
16) Wolfe's lawyers knew how to leverage the fear within DC to get the best outcome for their client.
17) Cunning Weissman knew by publicly releasing the FISA application, using the goofy and easily dismissible justification of a FOIA request, he could remove that element from the criminal case.
Which is exactly what happened. 👇👇
18) With that charge removed, the corrupt politicians within the Senate Intel Commitee, who were part of the Trump targeting operation, then used their power to protect the guy they used to conduct their leak operation.
19) The defense lawyers then leveraged the power of the SSCI co-conspirators to the benefit of their client.
20) And that my friends, is the reason why the top secret classified Carter Page FISA application was publicly released in July of 2018.
Now do you see how corrupt and enmeshed the special counsel operation really was?
/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s not just them. Really think about it, shift the paradigm, and OMG 😳 it all makes sense.
What the FBI does, and what the FBI doesn’t do. Use this reference and every single example reconciles, like a fuzzy picture that suddenly becomes clear
1) The people who installed the current occupant of the White House; that's the people who control the "presidency" of Joe Biden; have this to say about their intent to block any effort seeking to stop the process they used.
2) The people in control of the presidency, are doing this, and other things, to ensure the continuation of what they call "rule of law" and "our democracy":
3) This is literally what "their democracy" looks like.
[For those unaware, this was what was once called "the people's house" in popular representative parlance.]
2) A play-by-play perspective of a Democratic Convention showdown....
3) Clyburn heads to the White House for a meeting with Biden. He lays it all out – Biden needs to step down! Feeling the pressure, Biden announces he’s not running for re-election, leaving his supporters stunned and betrayed.
1. After Eric Holder left the Obama administration as Attorney General, he was hired by the State of California to defend against the Trump administration in early January 2017.
2. When Eric Holder left the Obama administration, his firm was contracted by California during a process of linking the motor vehicle registration files to the Secretary of State voter registration system.
Holder was advising on part of a technology system being constructed to bridge the DMV and SoS offices. You might know this as a “Motor/Voter” process. However, former AG Eric Holder had a very specific function in the construction of this technology bridge.
3. The process of adding voters to the registration rolls when they receive or update their driver’s license was seen as an opportunity to expand the voter rolls. Making the voter rolls as big as possible is the key to the utilization of mass mail-out balloting.
1) Let me bring FU type clarity to the "reasonable reforms" argument.
I have talked to everyone in DC about this. They are idiots. Not making mistakes, just plain allowing the IC to tell them nonsense. So, let me be clear.
2) Office of Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified April 27, 2023, more than 3.4 million search queries into the NSA database took place between Dec. 1st, 2020 and Nov. 30th, 2021, by government officials and/or contractors working on behalf of the federal government.
3) These search queries were based on authorizations related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and 702 search authorization.
1) There are two general flaws in this type of analysis.
While likely accurate that ISIS did not originate the planning of the attack. Two elements stand out that appear to point away from Galloway's supposition.
2) First, the suspects are alive. Meaning, there was no mop up operation behind them to remove the fingerprints of operational control.
Example (mop up): They didn't jump in the car after the attack and have the car explode with them in it. Essentially eliminating the trail.
3) The absence of the clean-up (could have been anything - not just my example) implies the people who organized the attackers wanted the attackers to be captured.... and therefore, talk about their prior instructions.