It increasingly looks like ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Bundestag vote for #heavyweapons to ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ has achieved nothing โ€” perhaps even the opposite of its intended objective: gov line of hesitation & caution appears unchanged, but pathways to amending this line have narrowed down due to vote. Short ๐Ÿงต (1/8).
Many observers (incl. I) assumed that gov felt hindered by a lack of parliamentary mandate to step up weapons support or at least, would change course when receiving mandate. But voices inside & outside ๐Ÿšฆ coalition doubt there has been a change ๐Ÿ‘‡ (2/8).

I wonโ€™t speculate about the reasons for inertia โ€” just assume that significant forces in gov are not willing to do as much as possible & demanded by many MPs. So what can be done now? Ironically, Bundestag vote for #heavyweapons legitimizes & consolidates hesitant gov line (3/8).
1. Text of vote conditions deliveries on other factors eg. ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช NATO duties & capabilities ๐Ÿ‘‡. Essentially, it thereby validates gov previous claims to send whatever *itself* deems โ€žpossibleโ€œ โ€” by own assessment. Debatable how much material change vote implied in first place (4/8).
2. Bundestag vote for #heavyweapons has now created faith in the assumption that ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช is (will be) delivering such weapons (eg. in survey qโ€™s ๐Ÿ‘‡): if Bundestag said so, it must happen! It diverts attention from the question of whether gov is *actually* doing what it could do (5/8).
3. If gov doesnโ€™t want to change approach itself, only way to enforce a more robust approach is further Bundestag action โ€” either by threatening gov survival or binding gov hands legislatively. Given last monthโ€™s vote for #heavyweapons, both pathways are more unlikely now (6/8).
Many MPs will feel that first vote delivered enough (cheap talk) to save ๐Ÿšฆ face in public, incl. some MPs willing to pass a more substantial vote a month ago. Problem is: any piece of legislation now would reveal that Bundestag doesnโ€™t control gov & earlier vote failed ๐Ÿ˜ฃ (7/8).
In other words, while effective legislation would have been an easier option last month, the stakes are much higher now: what looked like a policy disagreement btw gov & parl. majority then, would now reveal a deep rift btw gov & its parl. support.

Looks like #scholz won (8/8).

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Christopher Wratil ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ #StandWithUkraine

Christopher Wratil ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ #StandWithUkraine Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chriswratil

Apr 19
German Greens are really in a precarious position now. There is no party in ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช parliament who got more right on ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บโ€” they had warned about ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ (esp. NS1/2) for years & decades. Usually, thatโ€™s the penalty kick when you expose the mistakes of the others & collect electoral supportโ€ฆ
โ€ฆ& in this case, it wouldnโ€™t be cheap exploitation of otherโ€™s failures, it would just be showcasing your competence โ€” they had a better, more accurate analysis of the situation. A great opportunity! But so far Greens leadership has decided against bc it would mean exposing SPDโ€ฆ
Their current & favorite coalition partner. Demanding investigations into ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ connection & criticizing SPD leaders publicly could end the coalition. SPD could try to portray Greens as unreliable & reckless. Huge risks for party & short-term stability of gov. But the dangers ofโ€ฆ
Read 6 tweets
Apr 17
This Easter we will hear everyone wishing peace for ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. And while "peace" is the word that for us all symbolizes hope & a better future, something we don't have to explain, understand instantly, there are different forms of peace. So which peace are you talking of?๐Ÿงต 1/8
1) The Ukrainian peace. This peace has ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ withdraw from / being forced out of all Ukrainian territory (perhaps save some concession, ie. Crimea), ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ democracy survive & being guarantueed by own & others' military capabilities. For some it also means NATO and/or EU membership. 2/8
2) The continued "peace". This is a continuation of what Westerners called "peace" since 2014. Parts of Ukraine are occupied, annexed & russified by Russian troops (eg. incl. new territories), intensity of conflict is lower. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ will be unable to become part of NATO or EU. 3/8
Read 8 tweets
Apr 14
Reading ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช commentators on Twitter & online forums on #steinmeier many say ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช is one of biggest donors of ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, delivers weapons, has done โ€žZeitenwendeโ€œ & many demand that gov should โ€ždraw conclusionsโ€œ from ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ uninvite. What they donโ€™t mention: ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช has sent & is sending more ๐Ÿ’ดโ€ฆ1/5
for energy to ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ than anyone else & was (is?) key supporter of allowing ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ depend on ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ energy โ€” financing Putin. Normally, if you enable war you are not invited or applauded but must go through humiliation & make up for what you have doneโ€ฆbefore even being talked to again. 2/5
Out of all countries ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช should know about this from its history. But perhaps thatโ€™s precisely why it is hard to admit to oneself that one bears (some) responsibility (much less than in past) for war โ€” again. Itโ€™s hard to see what โ€” by your identity โ€” is not allowed to happen. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Oct 18, 2021
Do parties' failures to represent voters fuel populist sentiment? Using a 12-country survey experiment during 2019 EP elections, @b_castanho & I find that they do - at least among those who were not populist pretreatment. Now out at @PSRMJournal ๐Ÿ‘‡(1/9)
cambridge.org/core/journals/โ€ฆ
While many explanations of populism focus on economic & cultural grievances, one partially alternative, partially complementary argument is about parties' inability to represent voters' policy positions. If voters feel no party represents them, they may become more populist (2/9)
Causal inference (esp. simultaneity) is a key problem here: "poor" representation may make people more anti-elitist, think with a Manichaean outlook & demand "power to the people". Alternatively, populist attitudes may cause people to (mis)perceive representation as worse (3/9)
Read 11 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Out now in @AJPS_Editor "Multidimensional Representation" with Fabio Wolkenstein. This is a paper about *HOW* we should study political representation. Basic motivation is that there is a gap between theoretical and empirical work on representation. (1/8)

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111โ€ฆ
While recent theoretical work (e.g. by Mansbridge, Saward, Rehfeld), which we call the *NEW WAVE*, has highlighted various important & exciting dimensions of representation, empiricists have not incorporated these theoretical insights in their designs. Check these tables: (2/8)
Analyzing a random sample of empirical articles on representation, we find that most do not engage with theory at all, or draw on Hanna Pitkin's conceptions of representation (in particular, substantive & descriptive representation). "New wave" is absent in empirical work. (3/8)
Read 8 tweets
Jul 5, 2020
Out now in @PolBehavior with @FabianNeuner! Using three conjoint experiments, we explore which exact components of populist ideology draw voters to populist politicians, focusing on the case of Germany and Bundestag elections. (1/5)
link.springer.com/article/10.100โ€ฆ
We identify key "thin" populist ideology components: people-centrism, anti-elitism, proclamation of crisis. As well as "thick" populist ideology components: anti-refugees, anti-EU, anti-globalization & pro-redistribution. We operationalize all as candidate attributes (2/5).
Results show that political candidates in Germany can increase expected vote shares with anti-refugee & pro-redistribution as well as people-centric appeals, but not with anti-elite or anti-globalization/anti-EU messages. (3/5)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(