The late 80's was the point where Postmodernism was alloyed with Critical theory.
It began with Critical Race Theory (the first CRT conference was in 1987) and Gender Studies (AKA Queer Theory) which began with Gayle Rubin's 1984 essay 'Thinking Sex'...
Both Critical Race Theory and Queer theory (sometime people called gender theory or gender ideology but Queer Theory is the name used in Academia) borrowed elements from Critical Theory and postmodernism amd fused them into a single way of thinking about the world.
Further...
The 1980's is when Henry Giroux mixed Paulo Fiere's Critical Theory of education with Postmodernism. In 1988 Giroux wrote "Border pedagogy and the politics of postmodernism."
The alloy of Critical Theory and postmodernism giroux applied to education he called "Critical pedagogy"
So in the late 1980's we have the creation of: 1. Critical Race Theory 2. Queer Theory 3. Critical Pedagogy.
So, the theories of race and gender you see everywhere now in connection with "Social Justice" and the education theories you see in schools that teach that stuff...
Were all developed at around the same time.
One last point...
All these theories are social theories which have baked into them both a view of how society works, how humans beings function, and a moral vision for how society ought to work...
That moral vision is based on...
The sensibilities of the theorists in conjunction with how they think the world works, and how they see human nature.
That vision is both unrealistic and dystopian.
I can't unpack the entire thing here (although a thread is coming on that) but these theorists want to reorder...
All of society along the axis of their moral vision as it is derived from their theories, which are filled with the relativism latent in postmodern thought.
It's high time the moral vision of these people be exposed to the sunlight of rigorous enlightement liberal methods.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When the Buffalo Shooter went on his racist rampage, he left a manifesto saying Replacement Theory was one of his motives.
Now dishonest people have decided to paint all republicans/conservatives with Replacement theory.
SO, lets talk about it
/🧵
2/ The term "The Great Replacement" comes from a 2011 essay by French thinker Renaud Camus. The essay claims elites are attempting to replace the white European populations demographically and culturally replaced with non-white people. Camus is basically arguing that...
3/ There is a collaboration among the elites to undermine the French people by replacing them. Bertolt Brecht once asked "Is it possible for government to dissolve the people and elect another?" Camus thinks the Great Replacement is an attempt to do that in France.
This person is trying to hijack the conversation to make it about the SBC scandal.
For point 2, the insinuation here is twofold:
A) I am in someway complicit protecting abusers in the SBC
B) I disagreed with a woman because she exposed said abuse
Neither of these are true...
My response to Du mez (that's the woman he said I fought totoh and nail) had nothing to do with the SBC. I disagreed with her over methods and conclusions, not abuse in the SBC.
Second, I'm not in the SBC, I am pentecostal. The SBC is not my circles, I don't know the people...
What she is arguing is for the view that thereis no essence to men or women. But, rather than state the position directly, she just snarks at and mocks anyone who disagrees and insinuates that all disagreement is really just insecurity.
This kinds of people argue socially....that is, instead of arguing against your view on the merit, they argue socially. They try to drive your view out of society by mocking it, smearing it to make it look bad, and generating social pressure against those who agree with you...
I outline one the way the strategy works in the article below
Do not let the thin veneer of academic engagement fool you. The goal is to win by making your views look bad and socially pressuring you to give them up.
This why I fight wokeness. Their views are so warped they managed to convince themselves that an entire group of people can't be loving parents because of their race and religion.
The thing is, if you follow the logic of decolonization to it's logical conclusion, you have to agree with her. And this is why wokeness and it's methods and ideas are so poisonous: if you follow them to their logical end point you get left with abhorent and evil conclusions.
What she said about white evangelicals is nothing short of rank bigotry, but because they have submerged themselves into theory that is built on a postmodern foundation full of moral relativism and nihilism they cannot see how evil their conclusions are....
She uses the buffalo shooting to smear evangelical christians who oppose CRT even though the shooter said he was on the authoritarian left and called himself an "eco-fascist socialist."
This is not the way to debate these matters
2/ Painting anyone who opposes CRT as supporting racism and "Christian Nationalism," is little more than a smear.
This is not the right way to discuss these matters.
I hate communism. I would never use a tragedy to try to say that Chuck Schumer is the same as Stalin...
3/ To use the buffalo shooting to claim that those who in Critical Theory and Postmodernism are complicit with the shooter is neither fair nor helpful.
It is also not true.
The fact that it is not true is a reason enough not to say it. The truth matters...it *always* matters.
1/ These pizza hut tweets from @JackPosobiec may seem silly.
They are not.
In the 90's common elements of middle class suburban life and culture (like pizza hut) were seen (by 'sophisticated' taste makers) to be empty consumerist kitsch to be enjoyed by unsophisticated rubes...
2/ The culture producers in elite/counter culture spaces looked down on the cultural products of the middle class: the art, media, food, and experiences the middle class liked.
It's this attitude :"I like this band, you've never heard of them and you really wouldn't get it..."
3/ What is happening now is that the kids who enjoyed that lifeand unironically liked those things: middle class houses and decore, restauraunts like applebees and pizza hut, accesible mass media (think old nickelodian shows or pre-woke Disney films, not cool art house films)...