Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture
May 25, 2022 โ€ข 26 tweets โ€ข 10 min read โ€ข Read on X
With the M777 and CAESAR two of the four artillery systems promised to Ukraine are now confirmed to be at the front in Donbas:

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ M777
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น FH70
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท CAESAR
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช PzH 2000

How do they work? What are their differences? What makes the later two the best?
A thread ๐Ÿงต:

1/n
All 155 mm NATO howitzers operate the same way and if you have not yet read my earlier thread about operating an American M777 howitzer, please do so now to familiarize yourself with fuzes, projectiles, primers, charges, etc. and how they are used.



2/n
M777 and FH70 are towed 155 mm howitzers with 39 caliber barrels.
This means their barrels are 39 ร— 155 mm = 6045 mm
This results in an 18 liter charge chamber, which can fit up to 5x M232A1 charges. Therefore the range for both guns is the same.

3/n
The FH70 includes a small engine, which allows the gun crew to drive it into position. The engine also powers the hydraulics to emplace the gun.

This makes the FH70 easier and faster to set up than a M777, which is emplaced by pure muscle power and needs a truck to move.

4/n
The FH70 and M777 use the same projectiles, fuzes, and charges. Only the primers are of different size. The sequence of preparing the projectiles and then loading the gun is also the same.

5/n
Just like the M777, the FH70 has to be sighted optically and adjusted manually. After each shot the gunner has to check and correct the gun.

The M777 A1/A2 are fully digitized and sighted with two LCD displays, but all M777 are adjusted manually too.

6/n
One advantage of the FH70 is the semi-automatic projectile loading. The projectile still needs to be rammed into the barrel, but this still results in a higher rate of fire than the M777.

Other advantages are the automatic loading of the primer when the breech closes and
7/n
the ability to fire the gun from the gunners seat, while the M777 requires the use of a lanyard.

The M777 and FH70 are similar systems and Ukrainian troops will use them in similar ways, which cannot be said about the next two systems.
8/n
CAESAR and PzH 2000 are self-propelled 155 mm howitzers with 52 caliber barrels: 52 ร— 155 mm = 8060 mm
The longer barrel allows for a larger charge chamber of 23 liter. This larger chamber can fit up to 6x M232A1 charges, which results in a better range for both systems.

9/n
This one charge more improves the range of both systems for base bleed projectiles from 29 km to 40 km and for standard projectiles from 24 km to 30 km.

But the extended range is not the main advantage of these two systems.

10/n
The CAESAR is fully digitized, with automatic gun laying, semi-automatic projectile loading, automatic ramming, and automatic primer loading. This allows the CAESAR to stop, emplace, fire 6x rounds, and depart in less than 2.5 minutes as this old French Army video shows.

11/n
This speed allows the CAESAR to operate within range of russian artillery. M777 and FH70 crews will likely avoid operating within 20 km of the frontline as there they would be in range of russian counter battery fire.

But counter battery fire is no problem for the CAESAR
12/n
or PzH 2000. Both will be long gone before russian return fire hits:

1) russian radar picks up CAESAR fire
2) russian radar informs a battery to fire back
3) russian battery sights and loads its guns
4) russian battery fires
5) russian projectiles need 70-80 seconds to hit

13/n
but already by the time a russian battery gets the order to fire back the CAESAR and PzH 2000 are gone. This is the main advantage of modern self-propelled artillery: the ability to shoot and scoot.

14/n
The only drawback of the CAESAR is that it carries only 18x rounds. So after 3x stops to fire 6x rounds the CAESAR has to return to the ammunition supply point to reload.

Still the CAESAR is the best artillery systems in Ukraine now... until the PzH 2000 arrives.

15/n
The PzH 2000 is fully digitized, with automatic gun laying, automatic projectile loading, automatic ramming, automatic fuze setting, and automatic primer loading.

The PzH 2000 is also Multiple Round Simultaneous Impact (MRSI) capable - it's the best system in the world.

16/n
The PzH 2000's automatic magazine holds 60 projectiles, sorted to allow the use of different projectiles and fuzes in a fire mission.

Btw: the guy in the back of this photo is the driver.
17/n
The magazine is loaded by hand. It takes about 12 minutes to load all 60 projectiles and 288 charges.

18/n
To speed up reloading the projectiles and fuzes are prepared by a dedicated support crew at the ammunition supply point (the same is done for the CAESAR).

19/n
When the PzH 2000 commander receives a fire mission he orders the driver to park at a suitable location. Once stopped turret and gun barrel automatically deflect and elevate for the fire mission.
If time or proximity fuzes need to be set, the gun does this automatically too.
20/n
Due to all the automation 3x rounds can be fired in 10 seconds. Or 20x rounds in 2 minutes.
After each round the fire computer automatically re-adjusts the barrel and improves accuracy by using data gathered by the radar on the barrel, which measures the projectile's speed.

21/n
The PzH 2000 also has MRSI capability, which means it can calculate and automatically adjust the barrel to deliver up to 5x projectiles at the same moment onto the same target.

No russian system has this capability.

22/n
Sadly Ukraine only will get 12x CAESAR and 12x PzH 2000. Ukraine needs more such systems.

Ukraine is now in talks to acquire Slovak Zuzana 2 howitzers, which are similar in capability to the PzH 2000... but it might take months for them to be built and arrive.

23/n
If we want Ukraine to win this war, we must send more Western artillery: especially self-propelled artillery with 52 caliber barrels and automatic gun laying (CAESAR, PzH 2000, Zuzana 2, AHS Krab (photo), AHS Kryl, K9 Thunder, Archer).

24/n
But we also must send M270 MLRS or M142 HIMARS (photo), because without them russian supply points and long range air defense positions remain out of reach for Ukrainian artillery.

The brave Ukrainians need our help. Let us be brave like them and send them all they need.

25/n.
What military/ weapons/ tactical/ strategic/ logistics/ materiel/ historic topic should I thread about next?

Please leave suggestions and wishes under this tweet.

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Thomas C. Theiner

Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noclador

May 12
In February 2022 putin declared war on Europe & his army marched on Kyiv.
Since then European EU/NATO nations have added and/or are forming these active (!) battalions to their armies:
(Worst 2 countries are of course the two loudmouths)

๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ +44 (3 recon, 4 tank, 12 infantry
1/14 Image
2 anti-tank, 6 artillery, 5 air defence, 4 engineer, 1 signal, 1 CBRN defence, 1 transport, 5 logistic)
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช +22 (10 infantry, 3 artillery, 2 engineer, 1 signal, 1 EW, 1 intelligence, 1 transport, 3 logistic)
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด +10 (2 infantry, 3 drone, 3 engineer, 1 signal, 1 logistic)
2/n Image
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช +7 (1 recon, 1 drone, 1 cavalry, 1 artillery, 1 engineer, 1 logistic, 1 transport)
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ +5 (4 infantry, 1 air defence)
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช +4 (3 artillery, 1 air defence)
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ +4 (1 cyber, 1 mechanized, 1 engineer, 1 logistic)
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ +4 (1 paratrooper, 1 drone, 1 engineer, 1 signal)
3/n
Read 14 tweets
May 8
Europe has to realize that there are two global military powers that it will have to find an arrangements with to safeguard its future security:
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ the US
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine

These two have the highest defence materiel production output, and troops from these two are present in the
1/9 Image
highest number of nations around the globe (Ukrainian troops are fighting russians in every nation, where russia has allied with the regime; a will to fight our enemies that is sorely lacking in the rest of Europe).
Minor powers like the UK or middling powers like France,
2/9
can't provide as much security (troops, defence equipment, tech innovation, will to fight, etc.) as Ukraine or the US.
While Ukrainians fight, innovate and produce vast amounts of war materiel, Europe continues to fiddle as the fire of war spreads across the continent.
3/9
Read 9 tweets
May 2
Fellow Europeans on here claiming that Europe doesn't need the US to fight off russia are delusional:

Does Europe have enough cruise missiles? No.
Is Europe investing to fix this? Also no.
Does Europe have enough tanker aircraft? No.
Is Europe investing to fix this? Also no.
1/6
Does Europe have enough maritime patrol aircraft? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.

Does Europe have any ballistic missiles? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.

Does Europe have enough SEAD/DEAD aircraft? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.
2/6
Does Europe have enough logistic units aircraft? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.

Does Europe have enough air defence? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.

Does Europe have enough recon satellites? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? A bit.
3/6
Read 6 tweets
Apr 25
On 2 April 1982 Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands.
3 days (!) later a ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Royal Navy task force left the UK to retake the islands.
That task force included: 2ร— aircraft carriers, 8ร— destroyers, 16ร— frigates, 6ร— attack submarines... a fleet bigger than today's Royal Navy.
1/8 Image
22 Royal Fleet Auxiliary ships provided logistic support... in total 127 ships sailed, and the Royal Navy still (!!) had enough destroyers, frigates, submarines to fulfil its NATO obligations.
It was an awesome display of military power, professionalism, courage and grit.
2/n Image
On 28 February 2026, after weeks of tension, the Iran War began... and even though the UK had been asked by the US for bases weeks earlier, the Royal Navy was caught wholly unprepared... and then it took the Royal Navy 10 days (!) to get 1ร— destroyer out of port, which after
3/n
Read 8 tweets
Mar 17
To give you an idea, why European militaries prefer US-made weapons to European-made weapons:

Europe militaries urgently need a ground launched cruise missile capability... the US already had such a (nuclear) capability in 1983, then dismantled all of its BGM-109G Gryphon
1/10 Image
ground launched cruise missiles after signing of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.
russia of course broke this treaty after putin came to power and after 15 years of ignoring russia lying about it Trump finally ordered to withdraw from the treaty in August 2019.
2/n
Just 16 days after withdrawing from the treaty the US Army began to test launch Tomahawk cruise missiles form land (pic) and in June 2023 (less than 4 years later) the US Army formed the first battery equipped with the Typhon missile system.
And as Raytheon has a production
3/n Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 8
These are the ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง UK's HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carriers.

First, as you can see in this picture, only one actually carries aircraft. The UK barely had enough money to buy the F-35B for one. For the other the Blairites expected the US Marine Corps
1/9 Image
to provide the required aircraft, because the two carriers were bought so the Royal Navy could fight alongside the US Navy against China in the Pacific.

But the US does NOT want the British carriers anywhere near its carrier strike groups, because the UK carriers would slow
2/9
down a US carrier strike groups, as the UK did not have the money for nuclear propulsion.
And as the UK doesn't have the money for the ships that make up a carrier strike group (destroyers, frigates, submarines) the UK expected the US Navy to detach some of its destroyers and
3/9 Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(