James Dyke Profile picture
May 25 12 tweets 5 min read
1⃣We are not going to limit warming to no more than 1.5°C. Anyone who says otherwise is misinformed, or in denial, or dishonest. Does that mean we are doomed in the future? Ask that question to someone suffering the brutal heat in India. eu.usatoday.com/story/news/wor…
2⃣Accepting the failure of the Paris Agreement means stopping asking for "more political will". We cannot continue to have faith in the political & economic systems that are unable to deliver the scale of change required. unfccc.int/process-and-me…
3⃣We've had decades of fine words & pledges but the fundamentals remain. 80% of global energy is still supplied by fossil fuels. That's 1970s levels. iea.org/reports/world-…
4⃣Fossil fuel use & emissions continue to increase. Remember #BuildBackBetter? It would be a disaster if we simply powered back all the fossil fuelled systems paused during the Covid19 lockdowns... iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
5⃣The only way politicians can continue to claim that "1.5 is still alive" is by invoking imaginary carbon removal in the future. How will this work? Who knows? The assumption seems to be that large-scale removal will work because it has to work.
6⃣This is wishful thinking. And rather than call it out, academics I fear all too often actively support it with the most fabulous scenarios that produce a 'safe landing' at 1.5 - scenarios that I would not be surprised to learn they have zero faith in. nature.com/articles/d4158…
7⃣It seems we will all play this game until 1.5 is passed in about a decade. By that time we will be in the same place we are now but with barelling past 2°C on the cards. nature.com/articles/52102…
8⃣And then what? Back to the "are we doomed?" question. The world will not end at 1.5. Perhaps tipping points will be triggered but they will take many years to unfold. media.nature.com/original/magaz…
9⃣Simply and brutally put: more warming means more destruction, suffering & death. Unless you are really rich, private-army-owning-huge-estate-in-New-Zealand-rich, then climate change is coming for you. And even then there comes a point... theconversation.com/climate-change…
🔟The risk with end of civilisation doomism is that it erodes away the understanding of what there is to fight for right now - which is everything! But for us to have any chance, we must accept where we are, what has failed & failing.
1⃣1⃣There is a dangerous tendancy to hold the line, to double down, to argue for one more push. This is locking us into further warming. It's not as if we don't have a vast number of alternative approaches to take. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
1⃣2⃣Saying 1.5 is over doesn't mean getting over 1.5. It doesn't mean giving up. It means we should fight harder for climate justice. 🙏 theconversation.com/climate-breakd…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Dyke

James Dyke Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamesGDyke

Apr 5
1⃣If anyone wants my "take" on the latest IPCC report then here goes (will be writing something about this later, but to be honest, this thread will probably allow me to say what I want to say more effectively).
2⃣1.5°C is over. We now have to imagine the most fabulous scenarios to truly honour the Paris Agreement. That includes increasingly including large-scale removal of CO2 from the atmosphere to drag down temps after "overshooting".
3⃣We are still firmly on course for around 3°C by end of century. But really these end of century and even mid-century projections & targets are meaningless. What we need is the reduction of fossil fuel use NOW (sorry for shouting).
Read 10 tweets
Aug 13, 2021
1⃣Ask not what mitigation can do for you, but what you can do for mitigation. I fear we have approached the climate crises entirely back to front. Rather than ask how can we rapidly reduce fossil fuel use we've instead been trying to prop it up for as long as possible. Why?
2⃣Because pretty much all the analysis around decarbonisation that comes out of the IPCC is based on models that can only ever explore incremental change in which the global economy essentially continues. This rules out - by design - the sort of actions that could actually work.
3⃣What Glen shows here are the rates of decarbonisation that we need to limit warming to 1.5°C. If we were serious about the Paris Agreement, we would use these to determine how quickly we need to get off fossil fuels.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 2, 2021
It’s publication week for my new book Fire, Storm, and Flood: The Violence of Climate Change. On 5th Aug @ 6:30pm I’m doing a free online book talk in partnership with independent bookshop @Octoberbooks. A 🧵about some of the things I will talk about. 1⃣ eventbrite.co.uk/e/livestream-f…
Things are not looking great right now. Records being shattered around the word gives us a glimpse of our future. We will soon look back at the crazy weather or 2021 as one of the final years of the stable Holocene epoch (all photos from book). 2⃣
But the climate has always changed right? If you look at past human history & then long before we even evolved, the Earth’s climate has undergone huge changes in the past. So why worry about the climate change we are causing now? 3⃣
Read 12 tweets
May 19, 2021
1⃣"albeit still much too slowly" and that is why net zero is a trap. It assures us progress is being made - just not fast enough - when we know that winning slowly is no better than loosing as @billmckibben once said.
2⃣One reason the @IEA report is important because it (finally) calls time on fossil fuel investments. But it's still full of climate unicorns. Vast deployment of technologies that either don't exist or haven't progressed beyond demonstrator.
3⃣The report explains this "Failing to take timely decisions on [carbon capture] would raise the costs of a net-zero emissions pathway & add to the risk of not meeting the goal by placing an additional burden on wind and solar to scale up even more quickly than in the NZE."
Read 7 tweets
May 11, 2021
1⃣This is very promising & is cause for optimism. But look, let's delve just a little bit deeper and you can see that these numbers mask a widening gap between actions and what we must do to avoid dangerous warming. A 🧵
2⃣The IEA has a history of underestimating wind and solar deployment rates. What's behind this latest revision is the big leap in China where wind & solar has taken off even without subsidies. Excellent news. But...
3⃣At the same time, China is building yet more coal fired power stations. The deployment of wind & solar is not replacing fossil fuel energy infrastructure - it's adding to it. Driving that is China's extraordinary growth in energy & material consumption. e360.yale.edu/features/despi…
Read 9 tweets
Apr 30, 2021
1⃣Thanks Simon. @James_BG makes a great deal of sense & I will reply below. But first I must point out one glaring error. He describes me as one "of Europe's leading environmental scientists". I am not!
2⃣That out the way... My immediate response is, James doesn't connect with the fact that net zero policies are simply too late. The rapid development of solutions are happening within a climate policy system that is decades out of date. inews.co.uk/opinion/climat…
3⃣James' argument is (I think) essentially a passionate defense of the climate policy system. He's a believer! It's that belief that drives action for change. For sure, without him we would be in a worse place.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(