1/ Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching: ‘Punish[ing] Those Who Fail To Do Their Gender Right’

Our big #qualitative analysis (386,277 unique responses!) published in Higher Education

link.springer.com/article/10.100…
2/Our findings suggest that student evaluations of teaching seem to measure *conformity with gendered expectations* rather than teaching quality

A cause for concern given the integration of SET data into performance profiles, and management and organisation of teaching practice
3/Before I go on, in terms of the necessarily binary reporting, it is very important to say here that we recognise the ‘pluralities inherent in gender(s)’ that complicate simple binary approaches to gender (Weerawardhana, 2018, p.189), and we do discuss this in the paper
4/Overall, positive evaluation of knowledge/expertise is expressed in terms of respect and success for men:

‘Amazed by how smart he is’

‘very experienced and very competent!!!’

For women this was expressed more in terms of enthusiasm, rather than expertise.
5/Positive evaluations of best features described women teachers as ‘friendly’, ‘interesting’ and ‘nice’.

‘Nice’ featured prominently in the F ‘best features’ data set

As did speaking in a ‘nicer tone’.
6/Demanding that women teachers be ‘nice’, and rewarding ‘niceness’ with positive evaluations, creates a requirement for women teachers to undertake emotional labour inside and outside the classroom where no such requirement exists for men
7/In the M ‘best features’ data, generalised positive evaluations of men teachers described the teacher as being a ‘good bloke’, a ‘good’ or ‘nice’ guy, or a ‘legend’.
8/For women, students remarked often on how their teacher’s emotions should be regulated.

Teachers were asked to be less ‘uptight’, ‘a bit calmer’, to ‘not look so miserable or unhappy’ and to ‘relax’ or ‘smile’.

‘not being such a bitch’ (candidate quote for the paper title)
9/Men were praised for being authoritative in the same way that a high school teacher might be authoritative (directive, perhaps even didactic)

Whereas women were assessed negatively for the same practice: condescending/‘babying’/‘treated like children’ or high school students
10/Women and men were evaluated positively for being supportive & available for students, but this differed qualitatively

e.g.

For women = expectation of more time/labour *outside* of class times

For men = expectation of more energy and thoroughness *during* class times
11/In this way, we find that women are punished for failing to perform in line with gendered expectations that place demands on women to be perpetually happy, calm and never angry, permanently available, and never engaged in advocacy for their own rights.
12/This #qualitative research is supported by a quantitative analysis of data from the same population

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
Thanks to the incredible @drljshepherd for leading on this research 🤩 Was a great team to be part of and I learned a lot about big qualitative data analysis!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with RealScientists | David

RealScientists | David Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realscientists

May 26
1/n Thread

I want to talk a little this afternoon about this win for trans athletes & athletes with sex variations

International Olympic Committee shifts toward human rights

Here from me and Drs Madeleine Pape and Ryan Storr:

theconversation.com/a-win-for-tran…
2/n

On important background, in March 2020 the IOC recognised harassment and abuse as a current human rights challenge, and in particular recognised that LGBTQI+ athletes are at “particular risk of harm and structural discrimination”
3/n

The IOC now recognise female eligibility regulation *as an organisational violence issue* and as systemic discrimination

[I'll do another tweet thread on this later, drawing on my own research on this]

Read 15 tweets
May 25
It just occurred to me that I neglected to provide some injury prevention materials here!

It's not all doom and gloom, I can highly recommend the free (!) Perform+ program from Football Australia

footballaustralia.com.au/performance
Now of course, as I discuss in my original thread, we must consider how gendered environments impact on the effectiveness of such programs

That said, I'm so pleased to be able to say that our research has had an impact on this section of the materials

footballaustralia.com.au/performance/ti…
Read 6 tweets
May 25
Good morning from #BJSMLive22 everyone

@BJSM_BMJ EiC @DreznerJon and conference Co-Chairs @FionaWilsonf and @osmanhahmed welcoming us in-person and online Conference stage as seen re...
I think will be a day of really important Sport and Exercise Medicine conversations, including on:

- PA promotion
- Low back pain
- Safeguarding
- COVID-19
- What should SEM look like in the 2020s?

#BJSMLive22

bit.ly/3oY6XUB
So proud that our relatively new @UniofBath research centre @CHi2PSBath is so well-regarded and represented at #BJSMLive22

We research injury and illness prevention in sport, and have a stellar team 🤩
Read 20 tweets
May 24
1/n 🧵

I want to address a narrative that we see around women’s sport and inclusion (particularly from those who seek to exclude trans women & women with sex variations from women’s sport), and how this narrative is part of a bigger pattern that functions to keep women small
2/n

I have been hearing more frequently the narrative that women's sport apparently exists as a 'protected category' so that women can win (because, on this account, without it no woman will ever win again)
3/n

This is:

a) *not* the reason why women's sport exists as a category,

and b) it is *not* true that no woman will ever win again.

This narrative is profoundly paternalistic and keeps women small.
Read 33 tweets
May 24
So I’m at the train station on my way to Brighton 🏖 Sign reading Bath Spa with a green hill and houses and blue Train leaving a station platform
First, I’ll be speaking at #BJSMLive22 tomorrow

This is a new online & in-person Sport and Exercise Medicine conference covering:

- Physical Activity promotion
- Low back pain
- Safeguarding
- COVID-19
- What should SEM look like in the 2020s? BJSM Live poster that reads: Bringing together the global SEBJSM Live speaker announcement featuring Sheree Bekker
It’s been great to be part of the programme advisory committee, alongside @DreznerJon @DrSportyKay @AJAtkin with Co-Chairs @FionaWilsonf and @osmanhahmed

#BJSMLive22

Use my discount code BJSMCOM15 to receive 15% off standard rates

bjsmlive.bmj.com
Read 5 tweets
May 23
1/n [Thread: gender and sport, sport injury, and prevention]

Today I want to talk about research that @J_ParsonsUofM @steph_coen and I published in @BJSM_BMJ

Free to read thanks to it being Editors' Choice

bjsm.bmj.com/content/55/17/… Slide that reads: Flipping the script: Let's talk about gend
2/n

I must say, @J_ParsonsUofM and @steph_coen are an absolute dream team to work with

Please do go and give them both a follow! Slide showing images of three women, Dr Joanne Parsons, Dr S
3/n And it all started here on Twitter! Slide showing a Twitter DM conversation, alongside an image
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(