The rise of pieces "debunking" the findings of the possible locations of unmarked graves of missing children who died at residential schools is deeply concerning. Framing these as "debunking" is harmful. Here's why. A🧵
The initial media response to the findings from Kamloops did contain misleading information. Part of this was a lack of knowledge about how ground-penetrating radar works. Part of this was about terminology.
Inaccurate reporting, however, doesn't mean that there aren't thousands of graves of children who died at residential schools, most of which are unmarked, even if they were initially marked when buried.
Inaccurate reporting also doesn't mean that the experiences of survivors, which often involve first-hand accounts of seeing children buried or digging graves themselves, are invalid.
Even if a child who died at a residential school was buried in a cemetery with an marker, that doesn't mean that parents were even notified of their child's death. Even if a child died of disease or neglect, they still died alone, away from home, without their loved ones.
The focus undermining on the ground-penetrating radar results is also problematic. It is true that ground-penetrating radar detects anomalies under the ground. But there are established scientific methods to determine what might be a grave and what might be something else in GPR
Demanding to see the remains of children from potential unmarked graves around residential schools in order to believe there might actually be graves is deeply disrespectful. There is EXTENSIVE archival evidence of children dying. We know they did, in large numbers.
What we don't always know is where these children in the records are buried. Many were buried in graveyards or cemeteries, but even when that happened, sometimes there is no trace of those locations today. GPR can help relocate these.
There is also the question of children who died and never were recorded. Recollections of survivors suggest that there were children who simply disappeared, or those who may have been buried outside of cemeteries. This warrants investigation of school grounds.
These articles focusing on debunking and downplaying the results announced over the past year are missing the point. It was already known that residential schools were places of horror where many children died and many others suffered. We didn't need GPR to know this.
The media attention over the past year means that more people in Canada and around the world are realizing how much damage was done by these institutions. It also means that Indigenous communities are finally getting the support they need to locate burial places of their children
One grave of a child beside a school is one too many. Thousands of graves of children is unthinkable, but it is the reality of the history of this country. Each child in a grave was loved. Each child in a grave was a child lost. #EveryChildMatters

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Kisha Supernant (she/her)

Dr. Kisha Supernant (she/her) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ArchaeoMapper

Sep 24, 2021
The responses to the paper, subsequent media articles, and discussions here on Twitter have brought to light some important reflects on archaeology, Indigenous people, and how we understand human history. A thread 🧵
First, many media outlets are framing this as *the* site that will push back archaeological understandings of the history of people in the Americas. This is just not true; many sites over the years have pointed to earlier occupations.
Many archaeologists now accept (or have always accepted) an earlier, pre-Clovis occupation. Many archaeologists also have listened to Indigenous communities who have long held that our ancestors and relatives have been here for much longer than archaeologists reckon.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 13, 2021
CW/TW residential school children
*
*
*
In light of the false reports circulating on social media about 1100 children found at Blue Quills, a thread about numbers and graves associated with residential schools from someone on the ground doing this work.
#residentialschools
There have been images circulating with larger and larger counts. Most communities are just beginning the journey to search around their schools and are taking time to engage with the survivors, Elders, and families to discuss how to proceed. This is a necessary step.
When you see numbers circulating, I encourage folks to go to the source of the information. Indigenous communities who have done this work and have chosen to share the results will have done so formally. Amplify what they are saying.
Read 12 tweets
Apr 9, 2021
Considering how much engagement this has gotten, I thought I'd discuss the main areas of pushback I get when I bring this up. 1) Who is Indigenous/a descendant? 2) But what about the science? and 3) Archaeology belongs to everyone! My responses - a thread
First, there are global definitions of Indigenous peoples, so I won't repeat them here. Indigenous peoples have rights, as outlined in UNDRIP un.org/development/de…
Related, I hear archaeologists say "but how do we know that Indigenous people today are descended from the people who were there before?" First, how do you reckon descent? Genetics? Material culture? These are not Indigenous ways of understanding relations.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 8, 2020
So this recent piece on whiteness and archaeology is stirring up some much needed discussion about why most archaeologists being white matters (a thread).
First, I must position myself. I am a white-coded Métis woman. I benefit from white privilege and I am a tenured professor of archaeology, another position of privilege. My privilege means I am heard ways my #BIPOC colleagues are not.
I am an Indigenous scholar in a field where most people who study the pasts of my paternal ancestors are white settlers. Archaeologists have told the story of my ancestors in educational institutions and the public for 150+ years.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(