What are the options? I think we start with 3 main options:
1. Marginal Gun Control 2. Absolutist Gun Control; Repeal #2A 3. Gun Expansion 4. Status Quo
The Marginal/Minimalist plan would limit the type of guns available.
The absolutist would be making guns illegal and confiscation.
Gun expansion would allow more freely carry gun laws.
#1 is the majority position among the Democrat Party. Unfortunately, its been tried before (Brady bill), and didn't really work all that well. Several studies have shown that it didn't reduce homicides at all (it did help reduce suicides).
#2 is the extremist position of gun confiscation and illegality.
I mean...do I need to discuss this?
#3 is what a lot of Red States are doing, which is passing constitutional carry, etc, etc.
Let us be clear what the consensus of the research shows: it shows that although right to carry laws may or may not reduce crime, they certainly have not shown any increase in crime.
So, I am willing to consider any of the above, depending on the situation. But I think we need to start the conversation by clearly stating that none of these so-called solutions solves the underlying problem.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Klein: "...@nicholas_bagley, a law professor at the University of Michigan. In “The Procedure Fetish,” Bagley argues that liberal governance has developed a puzzling preference for legitimating government action through processes rather than outcomes..."
“Legitimacy is not solely — not even primarily — a product of procedures that agencies follow...Legitimacy arises more generally from the perception that government is capable, informed, prompt, responsive, and fair.”
I'm fine with this proposal from Nathaniel Glasser and @haroldpollack.
But as a society, we need to decide what age people have full constitutional rights. If that age needs to be raised, I am all ears. But you shouldn't get to pick and choose. washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/0…
As for guns, I almost universally agree with their arguments here, actually. I don't think 18 year olds are mature enough to be handling guns without supervision.
Of course, I am an old fart, and I am not even sure 18 year olds should be driving, drinking, smoking etc...
Most murders are commited by those 18-24 (About 34%), while 25-35 is 28.4%.
"These results persisted when using regression methods to control for differences across districts. Interpretation: School districts that choose to mandate masks are likely to be systematically different from those that do not in multiple, often unobserved, ways."
"Failed to establish relationship between school masking and cases...demonstrates that observational studies of interventions with small effect sizes are prone to bias caused by selection and omitted variables. Randomized studies can more reliably inform public health policy. :
The right to bear arms started in England, and predates the Constitution. Many colonies guaranteed the right early on. Thomas Jefferson wrote in his first draft of the VA constitution that “No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
I mean, we can argue about what the extent of the 2nd amendment is (no right is absolute, obviously, as Scalia himself noted) but the individual right to bear arms was rarely, if ever, challenged for more than a century or more after our independence.