This a tale of inexplicable viciousness, bitterness and rage. I want you to look at this picture. Look at these individual drawings.
And more - some extreme projection here in this tweet (still targeting Rooney's book), given how much kids are currently being indoctrinated with gender ideology.
Vulliamy's campaign against the book continued. See these tweets from 2020.
The levels of irony in that last tweet are off the scale. This is someone going out of her way to ensure that a book is not seen or read and that an author is ruined. But all done under this facade of being 'kind'.
And 2021:
Yes, what WAS that about cancel culture, Clara?
Had Vulliamy even read the text of My Body Is Me when she began her vicious campaign in December 2019 that effectively caused Rooney to leave publishing? I somehow doubt it. Or had Vulliamy read the book and felt terribly threatened by it, for some reason? I have no idea.
But anyone who reads My Body Is Me ought to be able to see that what Vulliamy did was entirely unmerited and appalling. People need to see it for what it was. It was a vicious, bullying, unwarranted attack on a lovely little book. Vulliamy ought to be ashamed.
I hope this thread throws light on what actually happened because Rooney has come under attack again in the past week. I hope the thread shows Vulliamy & her co-conspirators within children's publishing for what she is and what they are. Watch this space.
Here's Frank. Bless.
Here's Layla. Go Layla.
Here's Milo. Sweet.
And Jasmine...
Such fabulous gender non-conformity. Hurrah! Such diversity. You'd think that someone who claims to be in favour of gender non-conformity and diversity would champion a book like this. But for some reason that's not what Vulliamy did. She trashed it. 🤔
Milo reminds me of someone...
WITHOUT EVEN READING IT.
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset Mate, it's not like this is some big legitimate organisation. They had to move to SPAIN in order to carry on doing what they were doing - but the authorities still caught up with them.
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset Seriously mate, do some more research into this stuff. You've been duped by snake-oil salespersons.
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset No comeback for that, then?
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset But, on reflection, I have no doubt that you're also a misogynist because the only men who argue endlessly about this stuff really hate women.
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset The truth is, you clearly demonstrated that you know nothing by sharing that Webberley article. The discussion should have stopped there with this GIF
@marlathedoctor @Transgendertrd @Michael_AW77 @SimonGwynn @Blakey_Is_Back_ @LizzieCornish12 @mrssomerset But not all of them, it would seem!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@msjlindsay Very generous of you, Jenny, as ever. Personally, I don't believe for a second that they didn't know about it or endorse it. I think there are a few posts from last night by @Unity_MoT that more or less prove that. So they are dissembling.
@msjlindsay @Unity_MoT And we all know that such orgs in Scotland have been victimising anyone who refuses to chant the gender ideology mantras, to succumb to the regressive misogynous and homophobic boot.
@msjlindsay @Unity_MoT They pretend to be progressive, while compromising the rights of women and girls - from single-sex spaces to sports. They pretend to have the support of the "gay community" while men-in-dresses overtake lesbian dating sites pretending to be lesbians and trying to get a date.
Maybe this book "Grandad's Pride" - supposedly for two to seven year-olds, published by @simonschusterUK and @AndersenPress, sold by @AmazonUK, with a prize from @Waterstones and promoted by @Booktrust - is all very innocent. Let's see what it amounts to.
@ToothyMaestra @SoniaPoulton @simonschusterUK @AndersenPress @AmazonUK @Waterstones @Booktrust Oh wow. I think you're right. Originally, they included an image of the fetish guy, right?
@RabbiZvi @coNora05 Here's the use of 'chickens' which I think is in another of his books.
While there are plenty of lolz to be had at Nancy erroneously believing Newham had a massive spike in trans identification the serious point is this.
Stonewall just cost us coherence in public data upon which we make serious spending and policy decisions. That’s pretty bad
@Jebadoo2 Quite. The same can be said of crime data, where some male criminals have self-identified as female, and their crimes are recorded as being committed by women.
@Jebadoo2 It will be interesting to see whether local papers such as the @NewhamRecorder manage to report this fiasco properly, in the interests of their readers and residents
The definition in law of a protected characteristic is a very big deal isn't it?
Good. At least we have all admitted that we are fighting over something important now.
Y'know Nancy, a great deal of this clusterfuck could have been avoided if Stonewall had just admitted that you were invested in the definition of sex in law not being biological sex, and you didn't GAF about how that affected women, EIGHT YEARS AGO.
The word 'cis' is redundant. It's like inventing a word for everyone who isn't a Scientologist.
Don't @ me w BS like "it's in the dictionary LOL" or "it's Latin y'all" "LMFAO it means 'the same side as'" "geography" "the Alps" "science" 🥱
Replies off because that's inevitable
There's about as much validity in gender ideology as there is in Scientology and the numbers of believers in each group is about the same.
As a rational, logical adult, it's my right to disbelieve in quasi-religious ideologies. That doesn't make me a heretic. And I do not have to adopt the terminology and myths of such ludicrous ideologies e.g. "Thetans" "havingness" "cis" "gender identity" "born in the wrong body"
1./ Will someone switch off the lights at Stonewall? Today its CEO urged us to read Sonia Correa; the 'feminist' who claims, "the category woman is no longer of use for the feminist cause". If 'woman' isn't a useful category, how come transwomen want to own it so badly?
2./ At least Nancy Kelley and her bullyboy outfit have clarified something recently. Only 2 years ago their communications bloke insisted it was an outrage to suggest Stonewall had ever wanted to erase 'sex' as a protected characteristic. Today Nancy did just that.👉
3./ She bemoaned the fact the government might clarify that males (the male SEX ) are not allowed into female (the female SEX) spaces. She effectively pronounced that Sex=Gender Identity. That approach is indeed the total erasure of sex as a protected characteristic.