This a tale of inexplicable viciousness, bitterness and rage. I want you to look at this picture. Look at these individual drawings. Image
And more - some extreme projection here in this tweet (still targeting Rooney's book), given how much kids are currently being indoctrinated with gender ideology. Image
Vulliamy's campaign against the book continued. See these tweets from 2020. Image
Image
Image
The levels of irony in that last tweet are off the scale. This is someone going out of her way to ensure that a book is not seen or read and that an author is ruined. But all done under this facade of being 'kind'.
And 2021: Image
Yes, what WAS that about cancel culture, Clara?
Had Vulliamy even read the text of My Body Is Me when she began her vicious campaign in December 2019 that effectively caused Rooney to leave publishing? I somehow doubt it. Or had Vulliamy read the book and felt terribly threatened by it, for some reason? I have no idea.
But anyone who reads My Body Is Me ought to be able to see that what Vulliamy did was entirely unmerited and appalling. People need to see it for what it was. It was a vicious, bullying, unwarranted attack on a lovely little book. Vulliamy ought to be ashamed.
I hope this thread throws light on what actually happened because Rooney has come under attack again in the past week. I hope the thread shows Vulliamy & her co-conspirators within children's publishing for what she is and what they are. Watch this space.
Image

Image
Image
Here's Frank. Bless. Image
Here's Layla. Go Layla. Image
Here's Milo. Sweet. Image
And Jasmine... Image
Such fabulous gender non-conformity. Hurrah! Such diversity. You'd think that someone who claims to be in favour of gender non-conformity and diversity would champion a book like this. But for some reason that's not what Vulliamy did. She trashed it. 🤔
Milo reminds me of someone...
WITHOUT EVEN READING IT.
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset Mate, it's not like this is some big legitimate organisation. They had to move to SPAIN in order to carry on doing what they were doing - but the authorities still caught up with them.
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset Seriously mate, do some more research into this stuff. You've been duped by snake-oil salespersons.
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset No comeback for that, then?
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset But, on reflection, I have no doubt that you're also a misogynist because the only men who argue endlessly about this stuff really hate women.
@SimonGwynn @mrssomerset The truth is, you clearly demonstrated that you know nothing by sharing that Webberley article. The discussion should have stopped there with this GIF
@marlathedoctor @Transgendertrd @Michael_AW77 @SimonGwynn @Blakey_Is_Back_ @LizzieCornish12 @mrssomerset But not all of them, it would seem!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jane, Empress of the Known Universe (but not a GP)

Jane, Empress of the Known Universe (but not a GP) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blablafishcakes

Jun 6, 2023
Maybe this book "Grandad's Pride" - supposedly for two to seven year-olds, published by @simonschusterUK and @AndersenPress, sold by @AmazonUK, with a prize from @Waterstones and promoted by @Booktrust - is all very innocent. Let's see what it amounts to.

Image
Image
Image
@ToothyMaestra @SoniaPoulton @simonschusterUK @AndersenPress @AmazonUK @Waterstones @Booktrust Oh wow. I think you're right. Originally, they included an image of the fetish guy, right?
@RabbiZvi @coNora05 Here's the use of 'chickens' which I think is in another of his books. Image
Read 5 tweets
Apr 12, 2023
While there are plenty of lolz to be had at Nancy erroneously believing Newham had a massive spike in trans identification the serious point is this.

Stonewall just cost us coherence in public data upon which we make serious spending and policy decisions. That’s pretty bad
@Jebadoo2 Quite. The same can be said of crime data, where some male criminals have self-identified as female, and their crimes are recorded as being committed by women.
@Jebadoo2 It will be interesting to see whether local papers such as the @NewhamRecorder manage to report this fiasco properly, in the interests of their readers and residents
Read 5 tweets
Apr 11, 2023
The definition in law of a protected characteristic is a very big deal isn't it?

Good. At least we have all admitted that we are fighting over something important now.
Y'know Nancy, a great deal of this clusterfuck could have been avoided if Stonewall had just admitted that you were invested in the definition of sex in law not being biological sex, and you didn't GAF about how that affected women, EIGHT YEARS AGO.
@janeclarejones Nancy be like
Read 5 tweets
Apr 11, 2023
The word 'cis' is redundant. It's like inventing a word for everyone who isn't a Scientologist.

Don't @ me w BS like "it's in the dictionary LOL" or "it's Latin y'all" "LMFAO it means 'the same side as'" "geography" "the Alps" "science" 🥱

Replies off because that's inevitable
There's about as much validity in gender ideology as there is in Scientology and the numbers of believers in each group is about the same.
As a rational, logical adult, it's my right to disbelieve in quasi-religious ideologies. That doesn't make me a heretic. And I do not have to adopt the terminology and myths of such ludicrous ideologies e.g. "Thetans" "havingness" "cis" "gender identity" "born in the wrong body"
Read 5 tweets
Apr 10, 2023
1./ Will someone switch off the lights at Stonewall? Today its CEO urged us to read Sonia Correa; the 'feminist' who claims, "the category woman is no longer of use for the feminist cause". If 'woman' isn't a useful category, how come transwomen want to own it so badly?
2./ At least Nancy Kelley and her bullyboy outfit have clarified something recently. Only 2 years ago their communications bloke insisted it was an outrage to suggest Stonewall had ever wanted to erase 'sex' as a protected characteristic. Today Nancy did just that.👉
3./ She bemoaned the fact the government might clarify that males (the male SEX ) are not allowed into female (the female SEX) spaces. She effectively pronounced that Sex=Gender Identity. That approach is indeed the total erasure of sex as a protected characteristic.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 10, 2023
TRA "Gotchas" include:
- "We've been ignoring your boundaries without consent or knowledge for years, why would you stop us now?"
- "Women will get sexually assaulted anyway, why bother trying to reduce it?"
- "Men need protection from men, so remove women's protections from men"
- "You can't trust men to respect your boundaries, so your only choice is to remove the boundaries."
- "If women can't handle men in women's spaces, the women should stay out and let us pee in peace."
- "If 'woman' can be described with many adjectives, then men can be women."
If you've ever been defeated by such impenetrable, iron-man arguments, please share.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(