@msjlindsay Very generous of you, Jenny, as ever. Personally, I don't believe for a second that they didn't know about it or endorse it. I think there are a few posts from last night by @Unity_MoT that more or less prove that. So they are dissembling. @msjlindsay @Unity_MoT And we all know that such orgs in Scotland have been victimising anyone who refuses to chant the gender ideology mantras, to succumb to the regressive misogynous and homophobic boot.

Maybe this book "Grandad's Pride" - supposedly for two to seven year-olds, published by @simonschusterUK and @AndersenPress, sold by @AmazonUK, with a prize from @Waterstones and promoted by @Booktrust - is all very innocent. Let's see what it amounts to.



@ToothyMaestra @SoniaPoulton @simonschusterUK @AndersenPress @AmazonUK @Waterstones @Booktrust Oh wow. I think you're right. Originally, they included an image of the fetish guy, right?

While there are plenty of lolz to be had at Nancy erroneously believing Newham had a massive spike in trans identification the serious point is this.

Stonewall just cost us coherence in public data upon which we make serious spending and policy decisions. That’s pretty bad @Jebadoo2 Quite. The same can be said of crime data, where some male criminals have self-identified as female, and their crimes are recorded as being committed by women.

The definition in law of a protected characteristic is a very big deal isn't it?

Good. At least we have all admitted that we are fighting over something important now. Y'know Nancy, a great deal of this clusterfuck could have been avoided if Stonewall had just admitted that you were invested in the definition of sex in law not being biological sex, and you didn't GAF about how that affected women, EIGHT YEARS AGO.

The word 'cis' is redundant. It's like inventing a word for everyone who isn't a Scientologist.

Don't @ me w BS like "it's in the dictionary LOL" or "it's Latin y'all" "LMFAO it means 'the same side as'" "geography" "the Alps" "science" 🥱

Replies off because that's inevitable There's about as much validity in gender ideology as there is in Scientology and the numbers of believers in each group is about the same.

1./ Will someone switch off the lights at Stonewall? Today its CEO urged us to read Sonia Correa; the 'feminist' who claims, "the category woman is no longer of use for the feminist cause". If 'woman' isn't a useful category, how come transwomen want to own it so badly?
2./ At least Nancy Kelley and her bullyboy outfit have clarified something recently. Only 2 years ago their communications bloke insisted it was an outrage to suggest Stonewall had ever wanted to erase 'sex' as a protected characteristic. Today Nancy did just that.👉

TRA "Gotchas" include:
- "We've been ignoring your boundaries without consent or knowledge for years, why would you stop us now?"
- "Women will get sexually assaulted anyway, why bother trying to reduce it?"
- "Men need protection from men, so remove women's protections from men" - "You can't trust men to respect your boundaries, so your only choice is to remove the boundaries."
- "If women can't handle men in women's spaces, the women should stay out and let us pee in peace."
- "If 'woman' can be described with many adjectives, then men can be women."

This a tale of inexplicable viciousness, bitterness and rage. I want you to look at this picture. Look at these individual drawings. And more - some extreme projection here in this tweet (still targeting Rooney's book), given how much kids are currently being indoctrinated with gender ideology.