A large batch of dec prepolls added and these were somewhat weaker for the Greens than earlier, and while reducing Labor's lead would still fall a few dozen short of the projected reduction. So that improves Labor's chances.
It looks to me like the Greens can only do this on COVID votes, they need there to be above average numbers of them and to break strongly. If either of those is not the case then there are probably not enough votes left.
COVID votes have not broken to the Greens - I am busy at chess now but note the ABC has called it for Labor at this point, I expect correctly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Not sure I should feed the clickbait troll on this (hence screenshot) but when we have a pollster talking this nonsense that is at least vaguely concerning.
Absolutely ridiculous (that word again) to say that FPP ensures voters vote for what they want. They vote strategically for the least worst option, the same one they would have preferenced.
Looking at some of the amazing 3CP races we have had this election - yes well those are the same ones where in Canada the conservatives sometimes win despite most of the voters not wanting them, because the other parties can't work out who has the best chance.
This is spectacular incompetence that this utterly braindead garbage by Hartcher has been published. Learn how elections work. Wait until the bloody count has finished before declaring Labor lost 600,000 votes and the Greens only gained 4000.
"These numbers are the official Australian Electoral Commission figures from late on Friday afternoon."
From an incomplete count, you overpaid twit.
This puts Hartcher in the same intellectual league as the United Australia Party who were yesterday using incomplete turnout figures to claim that turnout had crashed.
A few people today have asked me what rechecking involves so here is the thread so I don't need to answer that one again. On election night it's important to strike a balance between speed and perfection and there will always be some counting errors the first time.
Booth counts from the first weekend are checked over coming days including checking that votes are actually formal (easy to miss doubled/skipped numbers on long papers), that they are in the right pile, that they are tallied correctly etc.
This also catches and fixes errors like the ones I detected in #Lyons and #Gilmore (where numbers were written down the wrong way round in data entry - rare event but does happen.)
People may have noticed that I use the word "ridiculous" rather a lot but there is so much stuff out there that simply is ridiculous. I give you today's first pseudopsephologist, Senator Canavan.
In Qld Senate, LNP has been making big gains vs One Nation today. Probably because the count contains a lot of early-received postals and no absents (meaning gain rate vs ordinaries is far higher than in 2019) but I will have a look tonight to see if there's more to it.
Given ON's poor primary performance it might be they do poorly on preferences as well - OTOH could be a stronger minor party preference flow to them cause of mandate issues etc. Need to check if there are distortions in the count in terms of seats that are more counted.
I am suspecting that it's more than just postals and that when I looked at the Queensland count on Tuesday night, large prepoll centres could have been under-represented in the ordinary vote count.
#Curtin: Gap between Chaney and Hammond has been closing very rapidly on postals. But there are not enough left to erase it entirely, at best maybe cut it to 400 or so.
That would leave absents (which are bound to be good for Chaney) and dec prepolls (her prepolls have been OK so far but sometimes INDs do poorly on prepolls). Could finish inside 1000, still seems very unlikely it can be retained.
I will run the count health check on it.
No anomalies detected.
The high flows to Liberal are in Cottesloe and City Beach North which have low Green votes. The current count is most likely more or less correct.