Phil Syrpis Profile picture
May 30 8 tweets 2 min read
It has been 6 days since the Sue Gray report landed. Way back then, the humble PM said he took full responsibility.

Having been asked not to pass judgement or comment while we awaited the 'full facts', we were, immediately asked to move on.

How's that been going? 🧵1/8
First, #partygate is going nowhere. Why? Because the PM is, again, failing to take responsibility.

We've had more party allegations (Sue Gray's mandate only ever involved investigating parties on a list of dates); met with more obfuscation. 2/8
We've had allegations about editing the Sue Gray report, and a host of questions about the role of the Met Police.

The PM and No 10 are again, failing to provide any clarity; only increasing suspicions. 3/8
And, we've had the PM publishing a new version of the Ministerial Code (his Ministerial Code), which, in this of all weeks, erases the Nolan principles and gives the PM even more discretionary power. 4/8
Second, the Govt's attempt to reset the agenda is... floundering. The Chancellor's economic package was condemned by many on his own side as 'unconservative'.

So, he gave every impression that the help people desperately need is... time-limited (great...). 5/8
The windfall tax U-turn promises to raise £5bn. It is vulnerable to tax rebates to the oil and gas sector for UK fossil fuel extraction. COP 26 was a long time ago. Tory voices against net zero are a more pressing concern. 6/8
In any case, the economic policy news was quickly replaced in the headlines by the Govt's latest Brexit (non) benefit - the return to imperial measurements. (I'm not sure of the Govt position on conversion therapy).

They are bereft of ideas. 7/8
It looks very much as though the scandals are going to keep on coming and that the policy cupboard is bare.

The Party is riven with divisions and lacks direction. And a big majority of MPs still think that it makes sense to stick with the PM.🤷‍♂️ 8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phil Syrpis

Phil Syrpis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @syrpis

May 25
My 'hot takes' on the Sue Gray report, the PM's statement in the Commons, and the PM's future. 1/
(The report itself is here: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…)
First, we should not forget the terms of reference. Sue Gray was asked to establish a general understanding of the nature of the gatherings in scope (see paras 13-17).

Her task was NOT to establish whether the law was broken, nor whether the House was misled. 2/
Second, the detail of the various events which were the subject of the investigation (she notes at para 12 that it is possible that others occurred) matters.

It, like the photos we saw earlier in the week, helps to establish a narrative around what went on. 3/
Read 19 tweets
May 22
I've been thinking about the (new) educational divide in politics and the role of Universities and the Govt. I might have the beginnings of a theory. 1/9
The common account is that the reason graduates are strongly hostile to the Govt is that students are somehow brainwashed by their 'leftie' lecturers, and that Universities need to be shaken up in order to restore some sort of balance. 2/9
Unsurprisingly, I don't subscribe to that account.

What I think might instead be happening is based on the fact that Universities aim to foster a particular form of 'critical thinking' (with eg the close interrogation of arguments in the search for meaning and truth). 3/9
Read 9 tweets
May 20
A look at the NI Protocol from a slightly different perspective; looking to see where solutions can be found, and where positions need to be clarified. Long 🧵 - sorry. 1/17
There are two separate questions, which need to be distinguished.

The first question is, *to the extent that there needs to be a border between the UK and EU*, where should that border go? 2/
As I read it, the EU (certainly) and the UK Govt (almost certainly) *agree* that the border should be in the Irish Sea and not across Ireland. The problem here, is the position of the DUP. 3/
Read 17 tweets
May 15
It is difficult to keep track of the shape-shifting arguments of the UK Govt on the NI Protocol (I've been listening to Frost, Kwarteng and Burns).

There are several strands which come up. The Govt is all too rarely interrogated about the detail. 1/13 🧵
The most obvious point is that the core problem - that there now need to be border checks between the UK (or GB) and the EU - is caused not by the Protocol, but by this Brexit. 2/
The Govt urges the EU to be imaginative and flexible. It should be confronted with the reality that a different approach to Brexit - one which did not insist on divergence for divergence's sake - would reduce the need for border checks, and 'de-dramatise' the border issues. 3/
Read 15 tweets
May 11
This shouldn't need saying again, but in view of today's media coverage of the NI Protocol, perhaps it does.

The problems are *not* caused by the NI Protocol, but by this particular form of hard Brexit. 🧵 1/12
While the UK and Ireland were both part of the EU and the EU single market, it was possible for both N/S and E/W border checks to be minimised.

And then the UK decided to do Brexit. 2/
It was - very belatedly - recognised that would create a problem in NI.

If the UK were to leave the single market, there would have to be a regulatory border between the EU and the UK. And both sides were determined that it should not fall across Ireland. 3/
Read 15 tweets
May 11
See this thread from… 2018.

Since then the UK and EU agreed the ‘Irish Sea border’ option; which the DUP doesn’t like (and which Johnson brazenly assured them wasn’t going to happen). 1/11
We are now urgently seeking alternatives (again).

A close relationship between UK and EU, which would eliminate the need for most border checks, is, it seems, not on the cards. 2/11
Instead, the Govt is threatening not to apply GB/NI border checks. It says that it doesn’t want a border between the UK and the EU (except to keep people out…); and that if the EU wants one, that’s its responsibility. It is urging the EU to be flexible and pragmatic. 3/11
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(