This week on my podcast, I read my @Medium column, "Apple's Cement Overshoes," about the cynical fuckery of Apple's sabotage of #RightToRepair, which ensures its devices end up in overseas e-waste landfills rather than being fixed and kept in service.
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
For all the debate around Right to Repair, it's amazing how simple the actual issue is. On the anti- side, you have companies who say that their users are a bunch of idiotic babies who can't be trusted decide who fixes their stuff. 3/
The companies say that they should be given the authority to decide who can effect repairs, and under which circumstances - and that they will only use this authority to keep their users safe. 4/
On the pro-repair side, you have people who say that companies aren't always the best choice for fixing the products they originate, and that the more companies have to block repair competition, the worse their own repair services get. 5/
When companies have to compete against an independent repair sector, they have to offer attractive prices and they have to keep up a supply of parts so older products can be kept in service. 6/
When users decide who gets to fix their stuff, they can make trade-offs - using an older device rather than sending it to a landfill, or fixing their own gadget because of an urgent need (say, farmers who want to fix their tractors to get the crop in before a storm). 7/
Apple leads the anti-repair axis, which is weird, considering their origins. The Apple ][+ birthed a generation of hardware hackers because it came with @stevewoz's gorgeous hardware schematics, inviting mods and fixes:
But there is *such* a powerful temptation to break repair. A desktop computer only needs replacement when it goes obsolete. 9/
Unlike a laptop or a phone or a smart-watch, your iMac is unlikely to suffer a cracked screen, get run over by a bus, get dropped in a toilet, or fall down a sewer-grate. 10/
The migration of computers from our desks to our backpacks, pockets and wrists is potentially wildly profitable. 11/
Not only do the damages from portability let manufacturers charge a fortune for repairs, but it lets them entice or coerce their customers into upgrading, rather than fixing, their gadgets.
Apple isn't particularly subtle about why it fights independent repair. 12/
CEO Tim Cook started 2019 with his annual shareholder letter, in which he warned his investors that Apple's profits were threatened by customers who stubbornly chose to get their old gadgets fixed rather than trading them into Apple for replacements:
He wasn't taking that risk lying down. In 2018, Apple led an anti-repair axis - including Wahl, John Deere, appliance makers, etc - in defeating 18 state R2R bills to force companies to supply diagnostic information, manuals, and tools to independent service depots. 14/
These right to repair bills didn't come out of nowhere: they represented the independent repair sector's frustration with giant corporations' ongoing legal and technical assaults on the fix-it shops that keep our gadgets working for us, and out of landfills. 15/
Long before Apple killed those right to repair bills, it was inventing and perfecting the anti-repair playbook that other industries followed. Apple used three tactics to fight repair: 16/
* Hiding documentation. Not only does Apple fail to publish its repair manuals, it actually treats them as trade-secrets, forcing internal and external technicians to sign nondisclosure agreements as a condition of accessing them. 17/
* Blocking parts. Apple goes to enormous lengths to keep replacement parts out of independent repairers' hands. When you bring your busted Apple product to an Apple Store, they'll often offer you a trade-in deal. 18/
If you take it, Apple gets to send your gadget to its "recyclers" who drop it in a giant shredder, a nonstandard practice that ensures that no one harvests working parts out of those broken devices:
Apple also engraves minuscule Apple logos on tiny, internal parts, and uses these as to make bizarre trademark claims with US Customs, resulting in refurbished, original Apple parts being seized at the border and destroyed as "counterfeits":
20/
* VIN-locking. This is when a manufacturer uses embedded processors to rig their products to reject new parts unless an authorized technician enters an unlock code into the device. 21/
Though this originated in the automotive sector, it's metastasized to phones, tractors, medical implants and hospital equipment:
All of this is good for Apple's shareholders, but it's terrible for its customers, and the world that we all share with them. 23/
Apple devices - like all electronics - are stuffed with toxic waste, conflict minerals and heavy metals, and require torrents of scarce fresh water and carbon-intensive energy to make. The longer these devices stay in use, the better it is for the planet. 24/
When they're shredded, they're exported to overseas e-waste dumps that are environmental and human-rights disasters:
On a more basic level, though, blocking repair is indefensible in a market economy. When you buy a gadget, it's yours. You are allowed to do whatever you want with it, even stupid things. 26/
If there are ways of using your product that are so dangerous to others that they should be banned, we do that with democratically accountable laws, not unilateral commands from corporations with unresolvable conflicts of interest. 27/
What's more, repair is in the national interest. Repair makes supply-chains resilient, keeping vital equipment in service when manufacturers are unreachable and unavailable or simply disappear. 28/
Repair is also an engine for economic development: landfilling a ton of e-waste creates one job; recycling that ton creates 15 jobs.
Repairing a ton of e-waste creates *200* high-paid, local jobs. 200! Repair accounts for 4% of US GDP.
When monopolists attack right to repair efforts, they often point out that repair advocates make money from fixing your stuff, as though this was some kind of damning conflict of interest. It's bizarre. 30/
Yeah, your neighbor who runs your corner fix-it shop pays their mortgage by fixing your phone for you. Was there anyone who didn't understand this? 31/
What's more, Apple - or Wahl, or GM, or John Deere - aren't exactly charitable nonprofits whose repair programs are operated as a public service. Apple was - and likely will be - a $3 trillion company. 32/
But all the money in the world wasn't enough to make right to repair go away. People stubbornly keep insisting on being able to choose their own repair technicians, and rejecting a future where we all drown in e-waste. 33/
It's shocking, honestly - won't anyone think of the poor shareholders?
Apple kept racking up wins at the state level, killing right to repair initiatives, but the company could read the writing on the wall: repair was coming. It's a matter of when, not if. 34/
So Apple switched to Plan B: they invented #repairwashing, fake repair programs that kept its repair racket intact, but made it seem like it was cooperating with the repair sector. 35/
In 2019, Apple launched its certified independent repair program, which allowed independent repair shops to fix some iPhone screens, with Apple's blessing. The program was a joke. 36/
Despite only allowing screen repairs, Apple refused to supply certified shops with parts to do these repairs. Instead, shops submit their customers' sensitive personal information to Apple, wait for Apple to verify it, and send the needed part.
Participants had to promise not to do any repairs other than the few that Apple permitted, which meant that shops that joined the program had to *reduce* the services they offered to their customers. 38/
They also had to promise not to buy third-party or refurb parts, and submit to random audits.
Unsurprisingly, they got few takers for this offer, but that wasn't the point. 39/
The point was to have a program that they could cite as part of their future efforts to kill right to repair laws: "See, the market is working! No need for government intervention!" 40/
This was just a stalling tactic. It couldn't last forever. Eventually, enough lawmakers would get briefed on how restrictive the program was, and so Apple needed Plan C: Repairwashing, the home edition. 41/
Last spring, the FTC reported on its two year #NixingTheFix investigation into repair, publishing a ringing endorsement for independent repair as good for Americans, for resilience, for the economy, and for the environment:
And a few months after *that*, Apple announced a new "home repair program" that would send real Apple "parts, tools and manuals" to iPhone owners who wanted to replace their screens or batteries. 44/
The announcement prompted a lot of speculation about how Apple would neuter this offer:
Apple shipped Hollister two Pelican cases' worth of phone-fixing tools, starting with an industrial glue-melting machine so he could separate his phone's case (Apple is Exhibit A in the case for "screws, not glue" to aid in repairs). 47/
The machine didn't work on the first or second try, and only managed the trick when Hollister located and engaged a hidden turbo-suction mode. 48/
Even then, it left behind a gross, gluey residue that was supposed to come away with tweezers (not included in the 79lb kit, and also, this didn't work).
Replacing the iPhone battery is a master-class in planned obsolescence. 49/
Any device that survives for more than a couple years needs a new battery. Apple pretends this isn't true - indeed, they secretly slowed older phones down so they wouldn't chew through their failing batteries. #Batterygate cost Apple $113m:
Despite this, Hollister discovered that replacing his battery required removing three different kinds of security screws as well as innumerable tiny, fiddly clips that held the ribbon-cables in. 51/
The screwdrivers in the 79 lb repair kit don't have the otherwise standard magnetic tips, leaving Hollister to chase minuscule metal bits around his workbench. 52/
Apple claims the 79 lb kit is full of "professional" tools, and it places a $1,200 hold on your credit card to cover the cost of replacement, should you lose or break them. 53/
For professional tools, these are awfully amateur-hour: it's not just the nonfunctional glue-melter or the unmagnetized screwdrivers. For example, the press that holds the battery down kept slipping, knocking the battery out of alignment. 54/
But eventually, Hollister finished the repair - and his phone *still* didn't work. 55/
The battery Apple ships is VIN-locked, and the phone won't recognize it until you call a third-party tech, cable your phone to a laptop, connect to the internet, and allow the tech to remotely access your phone (and all its data!) and bless the repair with an unlock code. 56/
This is clearly more repairwashing. As Hollister points out, Apple eats the cost of shipping the repair kits, about $200 each way. 57/
That's a pretty good indicator that Apple doesn't think anyone's going to go through an 80-page repair at home - especially not one that actually *costs more* than bringing your phone to Apple for the same repair. 58/
Contrast this repair with @iFixit's equivalent, third-party repair experience. For $20-50, iFixit will ship you a battery and all the tools you need to do the repair, and they repair excellent manuals and videos showing you how to do the fix:
Rather than using an "industrial grade heat-station" to melt your phone's glue, iFixit shows you how to use a heat-gun or even a hair-dryer. Or you can invest $20 on an iOpener - a gel-filled sock that you microwave and then wrap around your phone:
Apple's home repair program is an unfunny joke. The company's decision to design its devices so they are actively hostile to repair is an environmental crime. 61/
That's getting harder to deny as truly innovative companies pop up with elegant, lightweight, rugged, high-performance gadgets that can be fully serviced by their owners:
What's more, these devices can be upgraded piecemeal - their owners can easily install a faster processor or a better camera when they become available, without junking the whole device:
Right to repair is a no-brainer, which means that even mighty Apple, with all its tax-evading trillions, can't keep it at bay alone. Apple leads an anti-repair coalition of multinationals that strangle right to repair wherever they can. 64/
Apple was at the forefront in killing New Hampshire's R2R law. The state's motto might be "live free or die," but Rep. John Potucek - who helped kill the law - adopted a much bootlickier motto: "cellphones are throwaways...just get a new one."
In Ohio, Apple taught appliance makers how to convince lawmakers not to vote for right to repair. Ever notice how your parents' washing machines and dishwashers lasted for decades, while yours are beyond repair the day after the warranty expires?
In Ontario, @fordnation's "Open for business" Tories killed right to repair, shafting small local repair businesses to protect the ability of a California company to gouge Ontarians on repairs (please, Ontario, do not re-elect this bumblefuck):
The anti-repair lobby is still killing right to repair legislation. 68/
Just this week, John Deere and its Big Ag coalition got repair stripped out of a North Carolina bill, arguing that repair was *bad for the environment* because evil farmers might turn off their emissions controls:
In CA, a repair bill just died in the senate, despite support from 75% of voters. The bill died thanks to FUD straight out of Apple's playbook, which warned about data-theft, patent infringement, and the whole cliched parade of anti-repair horribles:
There was a time when Apple championed repair. Apple customers have fond memories of repair depots like NYC's legendary Tekserve, immortalized in Tamara Shopsin's incredible novel LaserWriter II:
Today, the company has committed its prodigious engineering, legal and lobbying muscle to preventing repair, designing gadgets of exquisite repair-hostility:
We can't afford this. It's not just the cost of replacing your gadgets rather than fixing them. It's the environmental cost, the human rights cost, the brittleness of our supply-chains, the collapse of local repair jobs. 73/
Inflation is here, and there are a *lot* of explanations for it. People who worry about the monetary supply blame it on excessive money creation during the pandemic and uppity workers demanding higher wages:
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
Anti-monopolists blame inflation on price-gouging. CEOs in concentrated industries give investor presentations where they chortle, rub their hands, twirl their mustaches, and announce their profits are sky-high thanks to their ability to raise prices:
Earlier this year, a person disagreed with something I said on Twitter. They picked a fight with me about it I told them I thought they were wrong, and why, and that would have been the end of it if they hadn't threatened to sue me.
Even as they were continuing to pick fights with me on Twitter, they had their general counsel send me a note telling me that I had to sit down with them and have them explain why I was wrong or they'd sue me.
Now, I've been sued by angry rich people who wanted me to stop criticizing them before. I won (thanks to California's powerful anti-SLAPP laws), but my insurer paid $60k just for the legal work to win the SLAPP claim.
How John Deere leverages repair-blocking into gag orders: A farmer's only local dealership refuses to fix his tractor because he advocates for Right to Repair.