In recent times we all have been bludgeoned with all sorts of intimidating but baseless propaganda about the indomitability of the northern political manoeuvres going into 2023. Many have come to believe that:

Thread 🧵
1. The 2023 presidential election winner can only be decided by the north.

2. That the south is and will remain at the mercy of the north concerning the issues of the presidency of Nigeria.
3. That Atiku and his few other northern PDP aspirants are the only viable options for the party.

4. That the South East don't have the votes to support any candidate that may be chosen from there because they don't normally go out to vote.
5. That the NW and NE have block votes that cannot be matched.

6. That the North has monopoly of the ability to rig.

7. That it was only Tinubu's command of(a doubtful) cult following in the SW that gave APC victories over the years.
8. That issues won't matter in the coming election and that people will just go vote as directed by the (over glorified) political 'leaders' who are mere jobbers.
9. That the generality of Nigerian youths and other sane citizens will not participate or make any meaningful impact on the outcome of the general election.
10. Finally,that the persecution of almost every tribe in Nigerian by the Fulanis will not matter or affect the outcome of the elections.
All these fallacious and baseless arguments as recently canvassed by some known paid political pundits should best be left within the realms..
of the imagination of these paid or uninformed speculators. Any serious political actor or follower of the Nigerian political geography knows that the north cannot seriously believe they hold the four aces come 2023.
History does not support their grandstanding. So, let me systematically and historically disprove those assumptions as baseless.
1. In 1959 the NPC could not form a government without an alliance from a section of the south.
In 1979 the NPN's Shehu Shagari could not clinch the needed 13 states to win.They fell back on the supreme court to chisel out 2/3 of a southern state votes (with the infamous...
12 2/3 of 19 judgement) to install him president due to the precarious state of the nation then.
In 2003 against OBJ the stake of the North on Buhari flopped woefully.
In 2007 the stake of the North again flopped woefully even against a fellow northerner Musa Y'ardua.
In 2011 even after all the gang-up to screen out and prune down to an anointed candidate and endorsements from the whole North, they failed again woefully against GEJ who was heavily supported by the SS and SE.
In 2015 Buhari managed to win in part because of the support of Tinubu's ACN and the Splinter nPDP group. It is worthy of note that in all these trials their turnouts in the core NW & NE states were the same but that never clinged the seat for them until 2015 when the...
mismanagement of political fortunes of the PDP by GEJ managed to allowed useful allies from Rivers, Sokoto and Kano to move from his camp because of inexperience, lack of political sagacity and poor bargaining ability.
What did anyone expect when his henchmen like OBJ, and all those that formed his political bulwark left to the opposition? All reasonable advices were shouted down then with the drunkenness of power of incumbency.
However, it is convenient for political jobbers to brandish the outcome of the 2015 election as the making and political dexterity of the north, without giving reasons why the north was never able to do so previously in 2003, 2007 & 2011?.
2. The South is not at the mercy of the north and will never be. From history of presidential victories nobody has been able to win the presidency if he compromises more than 2 out of the 3 states of Lagos, Kano and Rivers states.
Shagari struggled in 1979 because he lost Lagos to Awolowo & Kano to Aminu Kano.
Bashir Tofa of NRC struggled because he lost Lagos, Rivers & even Kano to Abiola.
OBJ was lucky because he won Kano & Rivers, though he lost Lagos to Falae. Y'ardua & GEJ both won Lagos and Rivers.
So the North can flex all they want, but without either of these 2 southern states they go no where. Buhari needed Lagos so bad in 2019 that he had to go back cap-in-hand to beg Tinubu & his western allies. Why didn't he go it alone if the North thought they could deliver him?
As I write this piece Kano is going NNPP, (just like they did with NEPU/PRP in 1959/1964/ 1979 & 1983). Lagos will surely swing South in 2023 Tinubu or no Tinubu.
Rivers is off limits already. So where will the north get the votes to win?
3. Viability of Atiku and co. It may surprise you to know that what has bouyed Atiku's political relevance so far has been the votes from southern states.
In 2019, the votes Atiku got from Akwa Ibom, Rivers, Anambra and Delta states combined was more than he got from almost all..
the NW & NE states put together.
Anambra state gave him 524K votes which was more than the 410K votes he got from Adamawa his home state. Akwa Ibom state gave him 395K votes which was only 15K votes less than Adamawa.
Rivers state gave him 476K votes which was over 60K more votes than Adamawa..!!!
So when we talk about viability and what people come to the negotiation table with what do we mean if not votes?
How many votes are Tambuwal, Saraki, Bala and Atiku coming to the table with?
You can't come with my votes in your pocket to negotiate with me.
Peter Obi's Anambra gave Atiku over half a million votes in 2019 while Adamawa his state came with only 410k votes!!!
4. Let nobody fall under the illusion that the SE & SS do not also have their million-votes capabilities like Katsina, Kano, and Kaduna. In all the past 5 presidential elections of 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015 & 2019, the north has been presenting candidates and have been trying to...
protect one interest or the other. It was therefore expedient that they poured out to vote because they had interests at stake hence the large voters turnout.
The SE had no stake except in 2011 when GEJ was perceived as a close ally and an in-house candidate.
The SE & SS had no motivation to go out and vote before then.
However in 2011 do you know that Abia brought out 1.1M. Imo 1.3M, Anambra 1.17M, Delta 1.3M, and Rivers 1.8M votes for GEJ? Do you think those voters are all dead now?
Why would anyone come out when he doesn't have a direct interest in what's going on? Now do you know that in 1999 presidential election where 2 SW candidates were running & the North had no interest, the total votes cast in Sokoto was 355K votes, Kano 800K votes, Yobe 311K votes?
These are all the same states that consistently gave Buhari over 1m votes each in 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, and 2019! Why didn't they come out in 1999?
So, you see, just as the good book says, 'where your treasure lies there will your heart be'.
Next time you write that the SE & SS don't go to the polls find out where their heart is. Give them a SE or SS candidate and see where the votes will be.
We can match the north vote for vote and rigging for rigging when the need arises as it will soon arise.
5. The much touted Tinubu prowess is really becoming undistinguishable.
With all the bullion vans and loss of interest in the presidential election of 2019 after the violence that greeted the Lagos state Guber election, the APC only marginally won Lagos with only about 130K...
votes, Ogun state with 86K votes, Ekiti with 36K votes and Osun state was won with just 10K votes. They lost Ondo and Oyo states. The average turn out in those SW states was about 500K votes despite the fact they had a sitting VP on the ballot.
This means that the SW is already having a voting fatigue towards the north.

6. This was far below the votes from the SE & SS. One then wonders where the Tinubu midas touch was? Maybe a time for serious clout audit has come, to really price these political jobbers appropriately.
It is possible that Buhari and the APC inner caucus know a thing or two about his dwindling sphere of political influence we all don't.But a window is still open for his reawakening. We shall visit that in due course .
7. Issues do matter in elections and in 2023 major issues shall show up. What will Nigerians do when a cross section of the country begin to talk about replacing one Fulani with another Fulani in a country of over 235 ethnic nationalities.
Do we think enough media campaign will take that off the political stage? What will become of religious bigotry that is presently smouldering with a possibility of snowballing into something else?
What will become of the desire for restructuring come 2023; how will the populace respond to even a new party that cuts this into it's central manifesto? What will the state of the economy and challenging food and fuel prices do to the campaign.
What will the issue of Fulani herdsmen, and general insecurity do for a carefully managed campaign?
Somehow some of these issues will bear their fangs on this 2023 elections whether we like it or not. #Endsars movement may even resurrect and hijack a political party, who knows?
Can the south turn the table? Yes they can. All it will take is honest desire to pursue reason. If the South West decides to nail the unbecoming arrogance of the North once and for all, that time would be now!!!
If Tinubu retreats from his foray in empty pursuit of the APC ticket after being bruised by the North and teams up with already reasonable minds like Akeredolu, and Afenifere Elders, PANDEF, and Middle Belt forum to support a detribalized sellable SE candidate like Peter Obi, no
northerner can match that ticket.
What do you think will happen if the SE/SW ticket is floated under a new party platform made of SDP, NNPP, APGA, Southern offshoot of PDP (Ekweremadu, Abaribe etc), and offshoot of APC (Tinubu & co)?
Surely the Middle belt will not vote another Fulani man even in their dream, & no Southerner will depart from this course of voting in 2023.
If we decide to be less ruthless in nailing the Fulani schemes a SE/Kwankwaso ticket with active support of the SW will also be a winner.
In all these we can see a pathway to victory against the agressors who think the opportunity given to them by all has become a right.
The ball is in the courts of the SW to rise above selfish mediocrity and grab the extended hand across the Niger. The SE did it twice for OBJ.
A good turn, they say, deserves another.
This may be the safest way against Fulani aggression, expansionism, ethnic cleansing, resources plundering and fastest way to restructuring.
Enough of this grandstanding. It's time to take back what is ours!!!
© The author chooses to be Anonymous.

ON 2023 POLITICAL GRANDSTANDING AND POWER FLEXING OF THE NORTH.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Olaudah Equiano®

Olaudah Equiano® Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RealOlaudah

Jun 1
A mass movement has just begun. It is the type that will test the resolve or lack of it of Nigerians to change the way things are in their country. Mr. Peter Obi, the former governor of Anambra State, who until a few days ago, was a frontline presidential contender on the...
platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has switched camp. He is now carrying the banner of the Labour Party. Obi is in the new party to give full expression to his aspiration to be the President of Nigeria. His former party constrained him in no small measure.
But like William Blake, Obi will rather construct his own system than be enslaved by other people’s systems. The mass movement represented by Peter Obi is a clarion call. It aims at a radical displacement.
Read 26 tweets
May 31
Snap co-founders’ wealth plunges $3.2 billion on Tuesday

Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy of Snap Inc. lost some of their fortune.
Snap shares fell 41% in trading Tuesday, the biggest intraday drop in the company's history, after the company cut revenue and earnings forecasts,...
reducing the fortunes of its two co-founders as well as other billionaire social network owners.
Spiegel, 31, who is Snap's CEO, lost $1.4 billion, or 30% of his fortune, & CTO Murphy lost $1.8 billion, or 36%.
Spiegel & Murphy now have $3.4 billion & $3.1 billion, respectively.
It's not just Snap's co-founders who have suffered. Shares of Meta Platforms Inc., the company that owns Facebook, fell as much as 10%, cutting CEO Mark Zuckerberg's fortune by 8%, or $5.7 billion.
Read 4 tweets
May 31
Switching to eco-plastics by 2050 will require about $760 billion in investment

Petrochemicals, the main chemical feedstock used to make plastics, are responsible for 2% of global carbon dioxide emissions, the equivalent of all air transport emissions.
Nevertheless, by 2050, plastics could become environmentally friendly. This will require about $759 billion in additional investment to support actions such as electrifying special plants that break down natural gas into the small molecules needed to make plastics and building...
carbon capture and storage facilities. In addition, a large amount of money must be spent on research and development, as well as changing feedstocks to produce biofuels.
Read 4 tweets
May 30
The first time I heard the adjective, 'acephalous', was in my secondary Form Four Government class. The teacher, Mr. Abayomi Oduntan, a youth corps member, was teaching the topic: "Pre-colonial System of Government in Igboland".
His introduction: "Igbo society is generally referred to as an acephalous society", rings a bell till date because of the pendantic pomposity of the adjective, 'acephalous', to the hearings of native Ekiti school children in my old Araromi High School (now Odo Oro High School).
We tee-heed at the sound of the word because the teacher had in earlier classes given us some words like gerontocracy, plutocracy (one Segun was quickly nicknamed that), political gerrymandering, etc.
Read 47 tweets
May 30
PayPal may soon accept all forms of crypto

PayPal, known all over the world as one of the leading online payment systems, will soon accept all forms of cryptocurrencies and blockchain products. This was revealed by Richard Nash, vice president of the company.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum, Nash revealed the latest news about PayPal.
According to him, the company is putting in efforts to enable the use of all digital services on the PayPal platform.
The announcement comes two years after the company had rolled out such crypto services for world’s leading cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, across the U.S.
Read 4 tweets
May 29
Thai Billionaire Isara Vongkusolkit’s Banpu Buys Exxon Mobil’s Texas Gas Fields For $750 Million

Banpu — controlled by billionaire Isara Vongkusolkit and his family — has agreed to buy natural gas fields in Texas from Exxon Mobil for $750 million as the Thai coal miner...
accelerates its transition into cleaner energy.
Under the deal announced late Friday, Banpu’s BKV Corp. will acquire 160,000 net acres in the Barnett Shale field — which holds about 93% stake across 2,100 wells that produce 225 million cubic feet equivalent (CFE) of natural gas..
per day — from Exxon Mobile subsidiaries XTO Energy and Barnett Gathering. The transaction will boost Banpu’s natural gas output by about 32% to 5.8 trillion CFE per day.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(