As if the state government has not done enough. Email I got this morning: "Next month, on July 1, 2022, the NM Paid Sick Leave Law will take effect. The Healthy Workplaces Act of 2021 requires all private employers, no matter the size, to pay sick leave to all employees.
This includes all employees: full-time, part-time, tipped, temporary and seasonal. Independent contractors are not included as they are not employees. Below are key highlights of the law:
· Employees will earn 1 hour of sick leave for every 30 hours worked, up to a total of 64
hours per year.
· Current employees will begin earning sick leave July 1, 2022.
· New hires will begin earning sick leave upon hire date.
· Earned but unused sick leave will carry over from year to year - it does not expire. The employer may cap the annual carry over to a
maximum of 64 hours however.
· Employees may use the sick leave hours as soon as they are earned.
· Employers cannot require documentation from employees using paid sick leave unless employees use two or more consecutive days of sick leave.
· Tipped employees must be paid minimum
wage when using earned sick leave.
· Payment of sick leave hours taken cannot not be held back - payment must be paid on the same scheduled payday as regular wages.
· New hires must be given a written or electronic notice of the sick leave policy.
· Employers must display a
poster regarding the Act in a conspicuous and accessible place in each location the company has.
· Employers must provide employees, in writing, an accurate year-to-date summary of earned sick leave accrued and used at least once every calendar quarter. The easiest way to do this
is to show the accrual and available sick leave on the employee pay stubs.
· You, the employer, must keep these records for a minimum of four (4) years.
· You, the employer, may not reduce employee hours to reduce accrual of sick leave hours.
· You, the employer, may not fire
employees and rehire as independent contractors in an effort to avoid paying sick time.
· You, the employer, may not take or threaten adverse action against an employee for using their sick leave hours.
· If your company already has a paid time off policy that is more generous
than what the Act requires, you may keep that policy. Examples would be a sick time accrual that is 64 hours or more per year, or a generic paid time off policy allowing time to be taken for any reason and accrues at 64 or more hours per year.
Attached to this message you will
find additional documents for your use:
· Guide to New Mexico's Paid Sick Leave Law, which provides more details about the Act. This includes information about what events qualify for paid sick leave, who constitutes a family member, documentation of illness employers may
require, etc. We strongly suggest you download this document and read it as we have only covered the highlights.
· Printable letter-size sick leave handouts in English and Spanish that can be given to new hires or made a part of your existing employee manual or employee new hire
packet.
· Printable posters in English and Spanish that you can use to post in the workplace.
So get this. The R's were told "Support SB 6 and you will not get SB 8." Well, how about neither of them? SB 144 is... yes... wait for it... Worse. It removes the perjury statement from absentee ballots.
New Mexico is set to STOP all voter fraud on absentee ballots because the definition changes. Think about this. What is the basis for a charge on absentee ballots? It's the perjury statement. If there is no perjury statement, there cannot be a charge.
So much for all the arguments from Senator Pirtle, Rep. Nibert and Senator Diamond. All out the window. Daniel Ivey-Soto moves all this stuff around. D's get everything they want. Do the R's actually force a serious discussion? No. Not a serious one.
to trash Poll Challengers, we do NOT have to sponsor the bill. Period. 2) Call your State Senator today and ask them to OPPOSE SB 6. There are way too many bad parts to this bill.
I had a discussion with Sen. Brandt about 2 weeks ago to ADDING Signature Verification to any
election integrity bill. This action would force a discussion about WHO is actually voting. After all is said and done, isn’t that the crux of the matter? New Mexico Election Integrity Project wants every qualified elector to be able to cast their ballot and have it counted.
No one else. A qualified elector is who the legislature wants to vote.
SB 6 has Republican sponsors. Sen. Ivey-Soto has coopted three more Republicans. Diamond, Lane and Nibert. Removing challengers from the process is a major step AWAY from transparency. And these three
@benraylujan sends me an email making claims about Election Integrity. Here's what he said.
"TODD,
John Lewis said it best —“Democracy is not a state. It is an act.”
I think about those wise words often, but right now in Congress and across America, they ring more true than any
other time I’ve been in Washington.
In 2020, voters turned out in record numbers to reject the Trump presidency and flip the Senate. But Republicans are ramping up voter suppression to try to stop the will of the people from ever happening again.
Last year alone, 19
Republican-led states across the country passed 33 bills that restrict the right to vote. Meanwhile, here in Congress, Republicans have used the filibuster to obstruct every single voting rights bill that Senate Democrats have introduced.
It’s time to leave it all on the field,
Mr. Jennings, I read your work often. I missed the fact that Brenner was issued a Cease and Desist Order from the company doing the training. Important facts left out of this story. Happy to hear you spent an hour on Critical Race Theory in Rio Rancho. The district has spent
much more time than that. Here are few more questions to ask: 1) Let's assume that CRT is not being taught. Why is there training material for teachers being kept from the public? What are they actually trying to hide? It would seem that a Cease and Desist Order would be the
reason you could not see the evidence Brenner discussed. 2) What is the point of Gary Trip providing cover to the school administration in/ an Op/Ed? 3) Why are proponents of CRT telling people that the theory is malleable? They have changed the name of the programs.
So this is a response from @benraylujan's Office regarding education. (Note this is on "Education".)_______
Dear Mr. Hathorne,
Thank you for contacting my Washington, D.C. office. Keeping in contact with my constituents is very important to me, and I appreciate the
opportunity to engage with you on such an important topic.
The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights is charged with ensuring equal access to education through the enforcement of civil rights protections in our nation’s schools. It is essential that we have strong
leadership at the Department of Education to guarantee that every student has access to the quality education they deserve and to protect them from discrimination while at school. The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights is charged with ensuring equal access to
@SteveDeaceShow Serious props. You guys truly have my respect. Your mission of teaching Christians how to live by our beliefs is a worthy endeavor. We listen daily. Ever since your RedState appearance. TY. @DeaceProducer@DeaceOnline
My wife is an ADF attorney and preaches your messages to me every morning. Can't tell you how many times she cites you as the evidence of her positions on public policy are correct. Your book arrived yesterday. We have found some resources before you have presented them.
There are plenty of sources you l show us. We have an opportunity to use these resources in court. Thank you for the validation for what we know to be true. You personify my definition of knowledge: accurate information, properly acquired, diligently applied to a productive goal.