Part of the excitement with a season two of #OurFlagMeansDeath is knowing that they could take it...anywhere. We have so many potential directions they could go in, bits of real history they could use as a blueprint or totally ignore, like, all the possibilities have me gagging.
Is the whole season going to be about the crew trying to find Blackbeard and reunite their splintered crew? Or are they going to reunite in the first few episodes and then have lots co-captaining adventures for the rest of the season? Or is it something else entirely? Eek!
And how closely are they going to follow the history? We know it's only ever been loose, but it has been a blueprint. Will they smoosh separate but close events together, and have Ed lay siege to Charleston in order to rescue Stede (where he was awaiting execution for piracy)?
Then again, they've already diverged from history by having Stede fake his death, so in this universe, in the eyes of the law, he's technically already dead. There's SO many places they could play around with fiction and history and not knowing HOW they'll do it is exciting.
And then Lucius! Omg, Lucius! So many ways they could play it. Did he survive by floating on his wooden finger? Or is he actually dead (to maintain the dramatic power of his killing), but will become Ed's sassy conscience ghost, like Badminton was for Stede? I like both!
Or are we going to spend the whole season THINKING he's a sassy conscience ghost, only for it to be revealed he was actually alive the whole time and pretending to be a ghost (with Jim and Frenchie's help)? I HAVE NO IDEA AND THAT'S WHY IT'S ALL SO THRILLING TO THINK ABOUT.
I'm so excited I can barely breathe, because I've seen so many thoughts and headcanons, so many that I like and which work in different ways, but there's also every opportunity they'll surprise us with something we didn't consider. And that makes me happy flap with giddy joy.
I'M JUST SO EXCITED BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY WAYS THEY COULD GO, AND I DO FULLY TRUST THEM TO DO WHATEVER THEY CHOOSE TO DO WELL.
I'm just so thrilled we get to see them all again, whatever they do and however it plays out. I just can't wait to see where these stories go.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is going to be a massively self-indulgent post, so sorry in advance, but I never feel MORE autistic than during big events like the Jubilee.
I never feel more unable to connect with the world around me, and never feel more unable to understand everyone's behaviour.
Hannah Gadsby once described being autistic as 'everyone else is operating on a wavelength you can't quite key into', and I never feel that more acutely than at times like this. It's like the rest of the country is in on some big weird secret pact that I haven't been privy to.
Everyone is just doing these things and behaving this way, all of them, uniformly, and I'm just bobbing around them going 'um, help, please, sorry, I don't understand'. They're all playing a game where they got the rules in the post and my instructions got sent to the moon.
The reason why I personally love what EastEnders have done with Janine as a mother, is because soaps have this terrible bioessentialist habit of portraying motherhood as this sacred 'thing', this innate essence all women have, and that's just such utter bullshit.
Janine is a character they didn't do that with. Her mothering instincts didn't magically turn on because she pushed out a kid. She loves Scarlett, for sure, but she has no idea how to be a good mother. It's not something that comes naturally to her. And that's...realistic?
In a genre that deifies motherhood (specifically 'natural' motherhood) in a way that I think is very damaging (just look at what Corrie is doing with Abi right now), it's refreshing to see a character who didn't have some magical 'mothering' switch turned on once she gave birth.
I'm honestly so frightened for Evan Rachel Wood right now.
I'm frightened for all the women who have come forward about M*r*lyn M*ns*n's abuse (and there are quite a few).
Some of the online dialogue against Evan is already putrid, and it'll only get worse from here.
I made the terrible mistake of googling their names for some sort of update about the case he's trying to raise against her, and stumbled across the most vile, misogynistic, biphobic, queerphobic diatribes against her for speaking out against him and his abuse. I feel sick.
MM is not a good guy being falsely accused. His treatment of women was practically an open secret. I first heard rumours about MM being abusive around 8-10 years ago. Two other women have sued him for sexual abuse. Others have also come forward since Evan spoke out.
Right, fuck it, I've been trying to stay out of it all, but I have to say something about it. I don't care what 'side' (ick) you take on the Depp/Heard trial, the use of 'odd mannerisms' as a way to determine deception is deeply, deeply dangerous for neurodivergent people.
This is not to say she ISN'T lying, again, this isn't about that, but it is about the wider implications that these 'analyses' of her behaviour, and her body language, have for vulnerable people. As someone who reacts 'oddly' or in unexpected ways to things, it's dangerous.
The overall sense I'm getting from the narratives around this trial is that if I were to be abused, and would report my abuser, and would go to trial, my very natural weird mannerisms, the way my body language doesn't always match what I'm saying, would be used to discredit me.
You know we talk about copoganda, and how tv cop shows and films act as propaganda for the police?
I kinda want to find a similar name for how some tv medical shows normalize bad behaviour, malpractice and mistreatment/disbelief of patients amongst medical professionals.
To be clear, I don't think it's endemic in the same way, nor do I think the police and the medical profession are comparable in terms of violence and power, BUT, so many shows deify doctors who do bad things and vilify patients who speak up or complain about their treatments.
Look at shows like House: he's a terrible, awful doctor, he mistreats his patients, he puts them at risk, but at the end of the day, he's always shown to be right, he always ends up saving the life, and the message is always 'the ends justify the means' and 'isn't he great!'.
People wouldn't have to get on flimsy inadequate boats and put their lives in the hands of people smugglers if we had a safe route of passage for people to enter the country safely and claim asylum.
People smugglers are not the great villain of this story, our government is.
And before anyone inevitably whines about it: people smugglers are bad, people smugglers take advantage of people's desperation...but it's a desperation WE created, by not giving safe passage to claim asylum (and propogating desperate conditions in the Global South).
If people are taken advantage of as they desperately try to flee a fire, yes, by all means, clamp down on the people taking advantage, but new people will always jump in to take their place, somehow, somewhere, if you don't also address the fire that people are running from.