Thread by @KshatriyaItihas

#PrithvirajReview:
A loose attempt to establish Prithviraj as a Feminazzi who gives half of his time fighting to establish Sanyogita a part of his Darbar, making her sit beside him to listen to public complaints. Such virtue signalling was never a part of Kshatriya traditions.
//

https://twitter.com/KshatriyaItihas/status/1532618267340091393

Women used to stay in their Zenana mahal rather than being part of such gatherings.

Samrat Prithviraj is shown a brother to Maharaja Jaichandra, yet he goes on to marry his own niece. Seriously?

Ghurid army is supported by elephants while Rajputs were fighting on horses. 🙄

Just before the Jauhar, Sanyogita is shown dancing on a song. Just imagine, dramatising an emotional moment on the name of creative liberty.

Maharaja Jaichandra who built the Ram Mandir & Vishveshwar Temple Kashi is shown a Traitor, something thats just figment of imagination.

Rather than wasting precious of time of the viewers, movie makers should have given a focus on Prithviraj's exploits in establishing diplomatic relations with his adversaries in wake of an invasion to strengthen Indian defense, like one he made with Solankis of Patan.

Not a single reference of Prithviraj's identity, or his caste, or any reference to principles of Kshatriya Dharma, the whole movie is unnecessarily dramatized, which looks extremely pathetic.

Overall, it's a waste of time & an addition to long list of anti kshatriya propaganda.