People often ask what I mean by system change re: the climate and ecological crisis. It is very simple. I mean a full shift to a truly sustainable society/economy. This means changing more or less every convention of our modern society.
Sustainable means what it says. A society and economy in balance with the ecological carrying capacity of the Earth. Essentially that means no unsustainable trends, where our impact on the natural systems of the world is growing.
You see, in ecological terms, if there is a component, where it's impact on natural systems is constantly growing. Eventually it will have catastrophic effects, impacting also on the component driving it i.e. human society.
Lots of natural components have growing impacts. Let's say an exploding population of rodents. But this is eventually counteracted, by a sudden fall in the population of that rodent. Often, it produces a cycle or rise and fall.
Humans appear to have got out of this cycle and effect, by using innovation to get around what would cause that contraction in that growth. For instance, the use of fertilisers and pesticides.
But this is at the cost of destroying other ecosystem components and biodiversity, which in a long loop, will eventually have serious impacts on us, that we can't innovate our way out of.
There is no simple recipe for creating a sustainable society economy. However, if we don't want our population, our civilization, our society and economy to crash, it is essential.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee made a major error in awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to Maria Machado, and failed to properly vet her. Just after the awards, several journalists dug into her past, finding she consorted with fascists, and violence.
This is the latest in a long line of inappropriate awards to political figure who then went on to promote violent military action and repression. They include Henry Kissinger, Barack Obama and Aung San Suu Kyi. That is not an exhaustive list of inappropriate awards.
2/
The Norwegian Nobel Committee needs to stop awarding Nobel Peace Prizes to mainstream politicians, unless there is exceptional evidence that they have renounced violence. Mainstream politicians always use false rhetoric and are compromised on morals and ethics.
3/
Almost certainly, Donald Trump's attempt to take over Greenland, has got nothing whatsoever to do with security, and this is complete misdirection.
It is about an aim to create an American empire, to get control of all mineral and oil reserves in the area.
1/🧵
We can be quite certain of this, as opening up mineral and oil reserves is almost certainly what the oligarchs and big corporations that back Trump want. It is a clear strategy, and is almost certainly what lies behind his attempt to annexe Canada.
2/
It can clearly be seen, that this was Trump's main pre-occupation with Venezuela, oil, not regime change or a particular regime. He wants US control of Venezuela. We can't be certain, who or what lies behind this.
3/
I want to demonstrate Donald Trump's highly abnormal pathology, with one issue, that is being treated as a bit of a joke. However, as he is deadly serious about it, we should take it seriously. His obsession with getting a Nobel Peace Prize.
1/🧵
The first, and most important aspect of this obsession, is that Trump can't claim he is doing this for America. This is purely about Trump's vanity and ego. There would be no material net gain for America, if it happened.
2/
The second, and most important point, is that Trump is objectively unfit to even be considered for a Nobel Peace Prize. Trump has been threatening to annexe, or militarily invade Canada, Greenland, Mexico and South American countries from day one of his second term.
3/
The murder of this woman by an ICE agent in Minneapolis, throws into sharp relief what a liar Donald Trump and his acolytes are. Trump claims to have watched the footage and seen her run over an ICE agent, deliberately, using her car as a weapon. We can all see from the footage, that's untrue.
1/🧵
Either Trump and his administration, all have seriously defective eyesight, or they are knowing liars. The footage clearly show no ICE agent was struck by the car, and the woman had turned the wheels away from them. She also set off at low speed. Meaning the shooting was not self-defence.
2/
The reason I think this is so important for determining that Trump is a knowing liar, along with other key members of his administration, is because the footage is there for everyone to see, and Trump and others claim to have seen the footage, and come to their conclusions based on this.
3/
Not since Hitler and the Nazis, has the leader of a major power said openly that they intend to annex and expropriate territory and countries, it has no historical territorial claim to. Donald Trump is openly acting like Hitler and the Nazis.
1/🧵
I am not saying Russia and China are right, but they do have historical territorial claims to Ukraine and Taiwan, because they used to be part of their countries. Whereas the US has no historical territorial claims to Canada or Greenland, as they've never been part of the US.
2/
In fact, there is a huge moral problem with historical territorial claims to other countries or territories, but that is another issue. I am only saying there is some basis to their claims. But there is none to the demands of Trump and the US regime. Pure gangsterism.
3/
Let's deconstruct Trump's kidnapping of Maduro, which is not quite the show of American strength it might first appear. It has been widely reported, that the US had inside help i.e. someone in Maduro's circle, reporting his location. This is what allowed the US to do this.
1/🧵
Without this, it'd have been difficult for the US to mount this raid, as reliable real time intelligence, is crucial to this type of operation. Even if it's known a target is often at a location, this isn't enough, because they may have been elsewhere at the time of the raid.
2/
Presumably, the insider provided other information, such as layout, the numbers of bodyguards, their arrangement, nearby military forces that could come to the rescue. If the US had failed, it would have alerted Maduro to their intentions.
3/