People often ask what I mean by system change re: the climate and ecological crisis. It is very simple. I mean a full shift to a truly sustainable society/economy. This means changing more or less every convention of our modern society.
Sustainable means what it says. A society and economy in balance with the ecological carrying capacity of the Earth. Essentially that means no unsustainable trends, where our impact on the natural systems of the world is growing.
You see, in ecological terms, if there is a component, where it's impact on natural systems is constantly growing. Eventually it will have catastrophic effects, impacting also on the component driving it i.e. human society.
Lots of natural components have growing impacts. Let's say an exploding population of rodents. But this is eventually counteracted, by a sudden fall in the population of that rodent. Often, it produces a cycle or rise and fall.
Humans appear to have got out of this cycle and effect, by using innovation to get around what would cause that contraction in that growth. For instance, the use of fertilisers and pesticides.
But this is at the cost of destroying other ecosystem components and biodiversity, which in a long loop, will eventually have serious impacts on us, that we can't innovate our way out of.
There is no simple recipe for creating a sustainable society economy. However, if we don't want our population, our civilization, our society and economy to crash, it is essential.
The president of the United States is a convicted felon, and adjudicated rapist, who'd numerous other pending cases against for serious offences, which he had no credible defence/defense. He's only not in prison, because he's president.
This is a mockery of the rule of law.
1/🧵
Clearly some people, are above the law, and it questions the moral authority of the US Government to prosecute anyone, when the executive in charge of the government is a repeat criminal offender, using his office to avoid appropriate punishments and further prosecution.
2/
Trump and his supporters, use the false argument, that these cases were politically motivated. This is clearly a lie, as they were clear contraventions of the criminal code. The tacit assumptions of these arguments, are some people are above the law.
3/
The new Labour administration have been a massive disappointment, not just about river pollution, but the whole climate and ecological emergency, which they deny i.e. they deny it is a crisis, requiring emergency reaction.
1/🧵
Typical of @Keir_Starmer, he provides no supporting argument about what he means by "Net Zero extremists". The only people he directly references are @ExtinctionR, but this makes no sense, as they are merely asking for what the @IPCC_CH and @antonioguterres are saying.
3/
It came to me the other day, how one psychological concept, groupthink, explains the whole current situation created by the unaddressed climate and ecological crisis.
However, to truly understand it, we have to understand what the group is we are dealing with here. In fact, it isn't a single group, but a nest of highly interlinked groups, from leading politicians, mainstream economists, oligarchs, corporations, and the controlling 1%.
2/
The best way to understand it, is as a clique, a grouping, where all those in it, have similar common interests. In fact, they often socialize and interact. They are not some sort of imaginary conspiracy theory, and anyway, the classic conspiracy theory is largely fictional.
3/
This incoming Trump regime, will produce chaos and mayhem, because of their science denial, and other denial of evidence and fact. They will become very unpopular, like the previous Trump administration. 1/
However, the problem is Trump only got in power, because the Biden administration, was itself, selling the public out to vested interests oligarchs. Neither the centre, or the extreme right, are representing the public interest.
2/
Centrist regimes fail to represent the public interest, and so lying, extreme right wing politicians take advantage of this, by offering wonder cures, racist, anti-immigration, nationalist policy, which is terrible, and will soon itself become unpopular.
3/
After the tragic LA wildfires, we've seen the usual fossil fuel industry sponsored, extreme right wing spreaders of disinformation blame it onto arson, not sweeping the woods etc, and anything but the main contributing factor, climate change.
1/
We saw the same thing after the tragic Valencia floods, and lots of other flooding events. According to these propagandists, it wasn't climate change related extreme rainfall, but the failure to clean the drains, and dredge the rivers.
2/
Also, every time there's an extreme weather event, or an out of control wildfire, exacerbated by climate change, then crude climate change denial moves up a notch, with Trump chiming in, or Mel Gibson, doing the long debunked ice cubes in a glass trick.
I received what I regard as a very threatening email, meant to intimidate me, yesterday, from the Principal Manager, Natural England, West Midlands Team. I wouldn't normally reveal emails like this, but I feel I have to, to nip this in the bud.
1/🧵
The tacit implication that I might be being threatening, abusive etc, is entirely made up and slanderous.
All I had said I was going to do, was to honestly, truthfully, respectfully blog the details of what has been happening.
2/
On Monday, I attended a meeting, in which the Principal Manager, said she would act as an uninvolved mediator. That pretence was dropped at the end, when she tried to browbeat me into accepting the entirely false and contrived explanations of her staff.
3/