People often ask what I mean by system change re: the climate and ecological crisis. It is very simple. I mean a full shift to a truly sustainable society/economy. This means changing more or less every convention of our modern society.
Sustainable means what it says. A society and economy in balance with the ecological carrying capacity of the Earth. Essentially that means no unsustainable trends, where our impact on the natural systems of the world is growing.
You see, in ecological terms, if there is a component, where it's impact on natural systems is constantly growing. Eventually it will have catastrophic effects, impacting also on the component driving it i.e. human society.
Lots of natural components have growing impacts. Let's say an exploding population of rodents. But this is eventually counteracted, by a sudden fall in the population of that rodent. Often, it produces a cycle or rise and fall.
Humans appear to have got out of this cycle and effect, by using innovation to get around what would cause that contraction in that growth. For instance, the use of fertilisers and pesticides.
But this is at the cost of destroying other ecosystem components and biodiversity, which in a long loop, will eventually have serious impacts on us, that we can't innovate our way out of.
There is no simple recipe for creating a sustainable society economy. However, if we don't want our population, our civilization, our society and economy to crash, it is essential.
There are scores of armchair, right wing experts who think the US could easily, militarily take over Greenland. See this video by a military strategist and former Finnish Army officer, who explains why it would be very foolish for the US to invade Greenland.
1/🧵
In short, Europe has vastly more troops and forces trained in Arctic warfare, than the US, and far more equipment adapted to the conditions in Greenland. The US has hardly any.
These right wing nutters, have no understanding of the conditions in Greenland.
2/
It would be relatively easy for the US to capture Nuuk, and a few strategic airfields, because of its huge military forces.
But what next?
The US would not control 99.9% of Greenland, and nor would they control 2/3s of its population.
3/
'Trump sent a letter to Norway’s prime minister Jonas Gahr Støre telling him that “considering your country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace.”'
Trump was never interested in peace, and the liar never stopped 8 wars, he just falsely claimed he did. All because of his demented racist hatred of Barack Obama, and he got something Trump will never have, a Nobel Peace Prize.
2/
Trump is America's very own Caligula or Nero for the modern age, a mad wannabe Emperor of a non-existent empire, making lunatic pronouncements, and he should be in a lunatic asylum for the criminally insane - for public protection.
3/
The Norwegian Nobel Committee made a major error in awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to Maria Machado, and failed to properly vet her. Just after the awards, several journalists dug into her past, finding she consorted with fascists, and violence.
This is the latest in a long line of inappropriate awards to political figure who then went on to promote violent military action and repression. They include Henry Kissinger, Barack Obama and Aung San Suu Kyi. That is not an exhaustive list of inappropriate awards.
2/
The Norwegian Nobel Committee needs to stop awarding Nobel Peace Prizes to mainstream politicians, unless there is exceptional evidence that they have renounced violence. Mainstream politicians always use false rhetoric and are compromised on morals and ethics.
3/
Almost certainly, Donald Trump's attempt to take over Greenland, has got nothing whatsoever to do with security, and this is complete misdirection.
It is about an aim to create an American empire, to get control of all mineral and oil reserves in the area.
1/🧵
We can be quite certain of this, as opening up mineral and oil reserves is almost certainly what the oligarchs and big corporations that back Trump want. It is a clear strategy, and is almost certainly what lies behind his attempt to annexe Canada.
2/
It can clearly be seen, that this was Trump's main pre-occupation with Venezuela, oil, not regime change or a particular regime. He wants US control of Venezuela. We can't be certain, who or what lies behind this.
3/
I want to demonstrate Donald Trump's highly abnormal pathology, with one issue, that is being treated as a bit of a joke. However, as he is deadly serious about it, we should take it seriously. His obsession with getting a Nobel Peace Prize.
1/🧵
The first, and most important aspect of this obsession, is that Trump can't claim he is doing this for America. This is purely about Trump's vanity and ego. There would be no material net gain for America, if it happened.
2/
The second, and most important point, is that Trump is objectively unfit to even be considered for a Nobel Peace Prize. Trump has been threatening to annexe, or militarily invade Canada, Greenland, Mexico and South American countries from day one of his second term.
3/
The murder of this woman by an ICE agent in Minneapolis, throws into sharp relief what a liar Donald Trump and his acolytes are. Trump claims to have watched the footage and seen her run over an ICE agent, deliberately, using her car as a weapon. We can all see from the footage, that's untrue.
1/🧵
Either Trump and his administration, all have seriously defective eyesight, or they are knowing liars. The footage clearly show no ICE agent was struck by the car, and the woman had turned the wheels away from them. She also set off at low speed. Meaning the shooting was not self-defence.
2/
The reason I think this is so important for determining that Trump is a knowing liar, along with other key members of his administration, is because the footage is there for everyone to see, and Trump and others claim to have seen the footage, and come to their conclusions based on this.
3/