Michael New Profile picture
Jun 3, 2022 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
(1/8) A new @Gallup poll shows a gain in pro-choice sentiment. However, pro-lifers need not be worried -- here's why
(2/8) The poll shows 55% of Americans identify as "pro-choice." This is a 5 percentage point gain from the last Gallup poll taken in May 2021.

Regardless of how the questions were worded, there was a 5-6 percentage point gain in favor of legal abortion since last year's poll,
(3/8) Nearly all of the gain in "pro-choice" sentiment came from Democrats.

Last year 70% of Democrats identified as pro-choice.
This year 88% of Democrats identified as pro-choice.

Greater pro-choice identification among Democrats might make little difference politically.
(4/8) The most important lesson from this poll is that fluctuations in abortion attitudes are driven by current events

According to @Gallup, there were gains in pro-life sentiment during

A) Mid to late '90s (Debate over partial birth abortion ban)
B) 2013 (Kermit Gosnell trial)
(5/8) Similarly according to @Gallup, there were gains in "pro-choice" sentiment in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Many thought the Supreme Court was poised to overturn Roe v. Wade before the Webster decision (1989) and the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision (1992).
(6/8) The @Gallup poll was mostly conducted in the days after the draft decision in Dobbs was leaked.

Most of the subsequent media coverage was not sympathetic to the pro-life position. As such, it is unsurprising the @Gallup poll showed an increase in "pro-choice" sentiment.
(7/8) To their credit, for the only the 7th time in the past 26 years -- @Gallup included questions about late-term abortions.

55% thought abortions should be "generally illegal" in the 2nd trimester

71% thought abortions should be "generally illegal" in the 3rd trimester
(8/8) Pro-lifers do not be frustrated or discouraged by these polls. Public attitudes on abortion often fluctuate.

Many of our policy goals enjoy strong public support. As such, keep up your efforts in building a culture of life!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael New

Michael New Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Michael_J_New

Jan 25
(1/7) Pro-life friends,

Many have asked for some commentary about the recent JAMA Internal Medicine study which claims that about 64,000 children have been conceived in rape in states that have enacted strong pro-life laws post-Dobbs,

Well here you go!
(2/7)

This is one of the most biased and flawed pieces of research that I have seen in my years as a social scientist.

The fact that it was published in a peer reviewed journal gives it respectability and credibility that it simply does not deserve
(3/7)

First, the authors claim that about 12.5 % of rapes result in a conception.

A survey of rape victims that was analyzed in an academic journal puts that figure at closer to 5%.

Even this 5% figure is high because some of the people reported multiple rapes.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 20, 2023
(1/6) Pro-life friends, @CNN is reporting that infant mortality rate in Texas dramatically increased in 2022.

Unsurprisingly, their spin is that the increase was caused by the Texas Heartbeat Act which took effect in September 2021.

For several reasons this is misleading.
(2/6) The TX infant mortality rate data is not publicly available. We do not have a good sense of where these deaths are happening. It is possible that increased rate of illegal immigration might have played a role.
(3/6) Also, @CNN engages in some statistical sleight of hand. Infant mortalities in Texas might have increased in 2022, but so did births!

As such, instead of looking at the number of infant mortalities, a better measure would be the infant mortality rate (per thousand births).
Read 6 tweets
Sep 7, 2022
(1/11) Pro-life friends, here is some analysis of the recent @WSJ poll on abortion.

It purportedly shows that 60 percent of Americans think abortion should be legal in "all or most cases"
(2/11) Since Dobbs there has been a gain in sentiment in favor of legal abortion by about 5 to 6 percentage points.

This @WSJ poll is broadly consistent with that
(3/11) This is likely a short term shift. Research shows that abortion attitudes shift in response to current events.

There was a gain in public support for abortion prior to the Webster in 1989 & Casey in 1992 when some thought the Supreme Court would overturn Roe v. Wade.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 3, 2022
(1/7) Pro-Lifers, it was a tough night in Kansas. There are still more votes to be counted, but things do not look good for the "Value Them Both" Amendment.

Please do not despair, this was going to be an uphill battle for pro-lifers for a couple reasons.
(2/7) First, a good body of academic research shows that money plays a large role in who wins statewide ballot propositions.

Since abortion is a multi-billion dollar industry subsidized by taxpayers, our opponents can almost always outspend us.
(3/7) Second, history shows that for pro-lifers to prevail in a statewide ballot campaign, two conditions have to hold

1) The campaign must take place in a red state

2) The pro-life policy change must be incremental and difficult to caricature or demonize
Read 7 tweets
Oct 30, 2020
(1/19) @philvischer & @SkyeJethani, I saw your video that questions whether overturning Roe is the key to reducing abortion.

Glad you're interested in the data. Evidence from the past 40 yrs shows electing pro-life candidates has helped reduce the U.S. abortion rate by over 50%
(2/19) Overturning Roe is not an all or nothing proposition. Since 1973, Republican-appointed judges have not succeeded in overturning Roe v. Wade. However, Republican-appointed Supreme Court judges have upheld a variety of life-saving pro-life laws. These include:
(3/19)
-Public funding limits on abortion
-Parental involvement laws
-Informed consent laws
-Waiting periods
-Partial-birth abortion bans

Meanwhile, judges appointed by Democratic Presidents almost always vote to strike down these common-sense, life affirming, pro-life laws.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(