@KlimaDAO might introduce inverse bonds. What are they, when could they come into effect, and how can they impact the #ReFi ecosystem and on-chain carbon market?
We'll dive into the good, the bad & the ugly 🧵
@KlimaDAO 1/
A bit of context: KlimaDAO is by far the largest holder of tokenized carbon, with +18m tonnes locked away in their treasury
Carbon gets sucked into KlimaDAOs treasury via bonds
But if inverse bonds for tokenized carbon are introduced, it won't stay in there... 👀
@KlimaDAO 2/
Inverse bonds are KlimaDAOs way to protect the value of its currency, $KLIMA
They could be launched if KLIMA trades below intrinsic value (IV)
@KlimaDAO 3/
Inverse bonds can drive up KLIMAs value:
- KLIMA is sold in return for another asset at a discounted rate (aka bonding)
- bonded KLIMA is burned
- the currencies supply shrinks
- asset backing per KLIMA increases
- which should lead to an upward price movement
- they will be enabled when the price of 1 KLIMA falls below 1 BCT
- KlimaCore repeatedly committed to protect the 1 KLIMA = 1 BCT peg through inverse bonds
- Klima team is working to prepare and test inverse bonds klimadao.medium.com/roots-of-resil…
@KlimaDAO 5/
The gap between the price of $BCT and $KLIMA is rapidly declining
KLIMAs supply inflates, and poor market conditions push the price far below its treasury value
We can't predict how prices will evolve, but the risk of 1 KLIMA trading at or below 1 BCT is growing
@KlimaDAO 6/
We also can't say for certain what will happen if KlimaDAO introduces inverse bonds
Leveraging inverse bonds will be different for different actors, but in general, it would look something like this:
1. Trade USDC for KLIMA 2. Inverse bond KLIMA to receive BCT 3. Sell BCT to receive USDC
@KlimaDAO 8/
Currently, ~48m$ (87%) of KlimaDAOs treasury is BCT & BCT liquidity
It is not clear which assets will be inverse bonded
4 scenarios:
Inverse bond
1️⃣ USDC from treasury
2️⃣ an even share of all tradable assets
3️⃣ only BCT
4️⃣ anything but BCT to avoid crashing the treasury
KlimaDAOs treasury holds ~4.3m$ USDC
Key benefits of inverse bonding USDC
- reduced or no selling pressure on treasury assets and KLIMA
- potential KLIMA price increase
USDC will likely be the first asset that'll be inverse-bonded
@KlimaDAO 10/
2️⃣ Inverse bond an even share of all tradable assets
This will have a wide-spread impact on all major carbon tokens on-chain, depending on the amount of assets sold
2.9m$ of carbon would be released in exchange for KLIMA. This could drive KLIMA up 29%
But there is a strong case to not inverse bond BCT - it holds so much of the treasuries value
Inverse bonding BCT would reduce the treasuries value by ~13m$, but could push KLIMA price up 53%
@KlimaDAO 12/
4️⃣ Inverse bond anything but BCT to avoid crashing the treasury
This would protect the treasury from downward pressure on BCT
But it would significantly impact $UBO and $MCO2, and take about 1.8m$ value out of the KlimaDAO treasury
@KlimaDAO 13/
A fundamental issue with inverse bonding carbon:
There is limited demand for on-chain carbon. Prices are short-term driven by buying & selling pressure
KlimaDAO as the biggest holder of tokenized carbon is most at risk if carbob prices crash
@KlimaDAO 14/
For this reason, the policy team are going to prioritize using USDC for inverse bonding
Inverse bonding other carbon assets will likely only be a last resort if all USDC is depleted, giving the community a long heads-up before there is any impact on carbon assets
@KlimaDAO 15/
The "black hole" narrative
Inverse bonding would permanently end the "Klima is a black-hole for carbon” narrative
The treasury wouldn't be a permanent carbon sink, and KlimaDAOs role is essentially that of a carbon trader
@KlimaDAO 16/
KlimaDAO has over time moved away from this initial thesis, and towards creating an economy for carbon markets
Any claims of making a positive impact solely from staking KLIMA would be highly questionable if inverse carbon bonds are introduced
@KlimaDAO 17/
Upshot: Toucan’s carbon pools are permissionless products anyone can build with. BCT was designed by KlimaDAO for Klima
And while inverse bonds could significantly impact on all on-chain carbon prices, we all are likely quite familiar with these short-term fluctuations
- Everyone can take advantage of arbitraging opportunities
- This creates more trading volume in carbon markets
- Bridgers feel more comfortable bridging because the tokenization isn't irreversible
We - as humanity - need to significantly scale up our carbon removal game. And we need to do it really fast. Otherwise, we won’t be able to prevent the most destructive outcomes of the climate emergency
Here are 7 promising carbon dioxide removal (CDR) solutions
A 🧵
1/
1️⃣ Forestation
Our forests are responsible for removing nearly 30% of human CO2 emissions annually. Forestation could remove 4-12 giga-tonnes of carbon/year
It's important to keep in mind that stopping deforestation is more effective than a reforestation project
2/
For carbon offsetting, 4 types of forestation projects matter:
Today, @VerraStandards made a public announcement addressing crypto instruments and tokens. 3 key pieces of news affect the Toucan Protocol
Let's dive in 🧵
@VerraStandards 1/
Verra
1️⃣ prohibits further bridging of carbon credits on-chain
2️⃣ explores a path to tokenization by introducing an “immobilized” state into their registry
3️⃣ launches a public consultation to create the best carbon market system
@VerraStandards 2/
First, we want to highlight that we welcome this announcement from Verra, which comes after a lengthy dialogue and close contact between Verra, multiple other carbon market stakeholders and us