There are many things I have wanted to say in the last 6 weeks of #DeppvHeard
But I haven't.
Because whatever I say will be used to attack not just me but others too.
Because that's how libel works. That's the whole point of it.
1/
You have not been sued for libel.
So you'll not understand how it's not just designed to silence you. Although it does. But also to destroy you. Which it does too.
It's not a pissy business dispute. It's a full-frontal multi-million quid existential assault. On who you are.
2/
You have not been sued for libel.
Because it is a rich man's sport. That only rich men play. Because only millionaires get to have 'reputations' in the age of the internet. Sticks & stones, pal, you just have to suck it up.
3/
You have not been sued for libel.
So, you don't understand how it's not just the trial or an act or an event, it's a process that goes on over years. It's a toxin that enters your central nervous system slowly & insidiously, until one day you can't move your limbs.
4/
You have not been sued for libel.
So you won't understand how it scares the very institutions that are meant to protect us. Even the liberal media orgs that published the goddamn words. *Especially* the liberal media orgs. Democracy dies in darkness? All the lolz to that.
5/
You have not been sued for libel.
You won't know how every step of the litigation fuels more social media abuse. Cos that's the whole point of it. You won't know how that shit sticks. Even with people you know. You won't know how the rage & unfairness seeps into your bones.
6/
You have not been sued for libel.
You have not been trapped inside the airless machinery of the legal process. You've not been forced to hand your personal messages against your will in the certain knowledge that anything you've ever said can & will be used against you.
7/
You have not been sued for libel.
But you may be a woman online. So you know how that goes. You communicate via platforms that optimise for virality - aka misogyny. You've seen what happens to women on the internet. You know what happens if they step out of line.
8/
You have not been sued for libel.
So you have not experienced your peers writing endless crap about #WagathaChristie while remaining stone cold silent even as they burn witches in pyres beneath your windows.
9/
You have not been sued for libel.
I'm speaking for no-one other than myself here. Because that's the first thing you'll learn: that you have to speak for yourself. Because no-one else will.
And over time, you'll realise that there's not even any point in that either.
10/
You have not been sued for libel.
But I have.
I'm still awaiting my verdict. But if my trial had been live-streamed, I'm pretty sure that I, too, would have been burned at the stake.
And I suspect, I wouldn’t just be broken. I’d probably be dead.
11/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Congrats to all the news orgs that signed syndication deals with this company. You’ve licensed your journalism to be a core component of Trump’s illegal war machine. Great job everyone 👏
A special shoutout to the editor-in-chief & CEO of the Guardian, Kath Viner & Anna Bateson. The deal with OpenAI was an unforced error which legitimised OpenAI’s illegal scraping of Guardian data & IP. In exchange for a quick buck. The NYTimes, in contrast, chose to sue.
Anthropic stood up to Trump. But OpenAI has capitulated. And now all its ‘partners’ are complicit in the consequences.
That includes Guardian. It will financially benefit from its journalists’ work - inc mine - being used to support Trump’s illegal wars & ICE’s reign of terror.
PREDICTION: If Andrew is charged (no assumption of guilt etc), we are going to have a crisis of both the press & judiciary.
In Britain, it is an offence to publish ANY info on defendant beyond bare facts.
But! US outlets can print whatever they like…
1/
Contempt of court is foundational principle of British justice: press must not prejudice a jury trial.
Editors risk a prison sentence if found in breach.
Even in digital age, the law held…but how could it possibly withstand deluge of US coverage in a case like this??
3/
Short answer: it won’t. Far right agitator Tommy Robinson weaponised UK laws on contempt as a ‘cover up’ over grooming scandal. And the New Yorker ignored & published on Lucy Letby.
If Andrew is charged, it’ll trigger a crisis for both the press & judiciary
4/
NEW: Our investigation for @thenerve_news reveals not only that Peter Thiel’s Palantir is completely enmeshed in our critical national infrastructure.
It’s also the ‘cloud support’ for our nuclear weapons system 1/
Palantir’s stated mission is to defend America. Peter Thiel is a radical libertarian who does not believe ‘freedom & democracy are compatible’.
Yet, the UK is overwhelmingly dependent on Palantir’s services. As a national security threat, this is off the charts. 2/
Please read the piece with comments from tech & national security experts.
We have no national security while we rely on highly political US Silicon Valley firms that are enmeshed in Trump’s increasing fascistic administration. 3/
Ignore the political pundits. They’ve failed us. The media is failing us. Listen to the historians. This is Conservative historian Robert Kagan on what is happening in Minneapolis & what it means. 3/
The barrister for the Crown has laid out the background and context for the case, including Ukraine's efforts to join the European Union.
2/
The barrister confirms that Gill was en route to Moscow when he was stopped at Manchester airport in 2021 (as first reported in @thenerve_news. 3/ thenerve.news/p/nathan-gill-…
There are sound reasons to criticise BBC. We’re all pissed off with it over something! But our valid critiques are being weaponised by the enemies of democracy.
The BBC is a crucial firewall in a moment of unprecedented danger. Why do you think Russia is joining in?! 3/