#TourOfDuty I once again warn.. Just to provide low cost military trained manpower for corporate security don't screw up whole system.. Cost of pension can be reduced anyway.. There are betterways of doing things. Let me explain what are the main objective of this scheme, why
Is this being forced by PMO on Military and what are its pitfalls.. Certain lobbies controlling political power in this country do not like backward villagers and soldiers shouting 'Sada Hak Aithe Rakh' so whole idea is to steam them out by making them corporate dependent..
Some people also feel it will help them more in so called strategy of Coup Fencing of Army.. In addition it provides cheap trained manpower for corporate security and cuts cost.. But if compared with such man power joining CAPF.. Then cost is still more..
What are the pitfalls. 1. Such soldiers will form their unions which will now be permissible by law. 2. Will join foriegn armies and private militia group 3. Will join criminal and mafia groups. 4..will join so many private militias like RSS...
5. It will increase more social disorder, unrest and crimes in society 6. Such groups will easy targets of enemy countries and countries who want fuel unrest... In my views Modi and Generals must consult Sociologists and Criminologists before taking any decision...
War in Ukraine clearly shows that performance of such soldiers is horrific.. Let us also not forget how Pindaris rose in India? How Turkish empire collapsed when they dismantled their regimentation system..
There are enough studies to show that what % youth of agressive societies must be kept as soldiers and sports persons so as to keep them calm.. You can not ignore such studies..
Once a close childhood friend of ULFA military Cdr Paresh Baruah told me... If India raises Moran, Ahom and Bodo regiments... Insurgency will disappear in Assam in just fea years why? Because youths with agressive attitude will find productive work..
So to keep certain aggressive sociaties calm, you have to bear such burdens.. There is no other choice... This scheme will hit certain rural societies like Sikhs, Jats, Rajputs, Marathas, Gurjars very hard. It will also reduce cash inflow in rural economy due to fall in income
#OperationSindoor some bitter fact. What was Modi's plan? Modi only wanted one night drama without esclating it into a short war. Idea was protect political image of Modi as being brave & use it in elections. Few facts. 1. Pak forwarned & told that only non mil tgts will be hit.
Clear weak msg conveyed to Pak Army that Modi doesn't want war. 2. Support of S400 & other AD sys not provided to IAF to shoot dwn PAF fighters in Pak airspace firing msls at IAF fighters in Indian Air space. 3. Next day morning India offered desclation. Cowardice response.
4. Pak Army Chief said India started Pak will finish it. IAF grounded her fighters and fleet for next day. It was only on 10th a clear and appropriate msg was send by India in good mil ways which resulted in ceasefire.
#IndiaPakWar in nutshell. 1. Gen Munir believed that Modi and Dowal behind BLA attack on Pak train and killing of 20 Pak civilian, ordered killing of Indian tourists at #Pahalgham. He was under pressure and reacted as radical. 2. It made Modi's political position vulnerable. Nw
Now under pressure from public cry and to save his political position and political face He ordered so called measured, non escalatory limited military response on so called non military targets. 3. Gen Munir knew how Modi will react and was ready with mil capabilites to ambush
Though suspension of IWT might hv surprised him. (Now Indian diplomats are trying to explain dimplatically that suspension has nothing to do with this mil standoff but different story sold in public). 4
What is this Brahmanical model of state which some brahmin leaders like Sawarkar dreamt for politically free India during times of British? Let me explain, it will put things in right perspective and also explain what Modi is trying?
Sawarkar and other Brahmin leaders like Tilak were of the view that under Treaty of Wasai, Brahmin Peshwa helped British conquer India and were promised a share in political governance of India. British did not fulfill it and Brahmins must have their state.
Brahmins must have their share in political governance of India. The model which they tried to negotiate with British was like this. Dominion of India will have a Governer General from Princely States (which assures political share to martial castes. Something like Malaysia),
#NewParliamentBuilding What should had been done and what is being done? What is the motive? Considering the event being an event of national importance and historic, the correct way was 1. President calls for a Joint Session of Parliament. 26 Jan is the most appropriate day.
2 Modi as PM inaugurates new building, and The President addresses the Joint Session of the Parliament outlining dream of India for next 50 years. Unfortunately, what is being done? Parliament is being inaugurated on the day of birthday of a Brahmanist Sawarkar.
Defying secular credential of our constitution, an impression i being created of establishment of a Brahmin Rashtra ( Hinhtra). Monarchial practices are being followed. Doctrine of collective wisdom is being ignored. Constitutional protocols are being violated. lated.
Constitution lays a broad framework of political structure of India. It certainly is not required to get into these small issues that who will inaugurate what? In such cases democratic traditions and spirit play a big role. Let us first consider tradition.
Viceroy as a sovereign head inaugurated the current parliament in 1927. This new building is a historic event and same tradition must continue. President must do it. Let us consider spirit of democracy. Constitution makes President head of the Parliament.
Hence, she must be given privilege. Now think logically, in democracy doctrine of collective wisdom must prevail. Opposition should had been consulted to make it a national event. Modi is in habit of using every govt function to attack opposition.
Should Sengol be put in Parliament? No doubt our constitution has been structured on Republic model of Sanatan Dharma and not monarchial. Sengol symbolises power of punishment of Yama as vested in state or monarch.
Parliament in a republic shall work on doctrine of collective wisdom. Which is symbolises by blue lotus. In a democracy stare powers of Yama are vested in President ( who confirms death sentence) or Commissioned officers of military..
Thats why they carry command batons. Placing Sengol in Parliament is highly inappropriate. Presidents office already has Small Ashok Pillar .. its clear that RSS and BJP have no understanding of Dharma...No wonder Modi by rejected by his guru to be a sant.