PS/ Ever since Oath Keepers head Stewart Rhodes was charged with Seditious Conspiracy, and ever since PROOF reported on the secret January 5 parking-garage meeting between Rhodes and Tarrio, it was anticipated Tarrio’s Conspiracy charges would become Seditious Conspiracy charges.
PS2/ Three men who head paramilitary units were subpoenaed by the House January 6 Committee on the same day in November 2021: Tarrio (Proud Boys), now charged with Seditious Conspiracy; Rhodes (Oath Keepers), now charged with Seditious Conspiracy; and Robert Patrick Lewis (1AP).
PS3/ Mother Jones recently reported that a subordinate of Robert Patrick Lewis in 1AP (the First Amendment Praetorians), Michael Kenny, issued a death threat to a House January 6 Committee witness that he (Kenny) said was made on behalf of 1AP leadership. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
PS4/ Congress made a key claim in subpoenaing Tarrio, Rhodes and Lewis on the same day—that the men had critical non-public info about January 6—and Lewis has boasted about being in contact with Rhodes and the Proud Boys both pre- *and* post-January 6, so Lewis is worth watching.
PS5/ We don’t yet know if Lewis has honored his federal subpoena; if the FBI has investigated the alleged death threat a Lewis subordinate made against federal witness Staci Burk; or if the House is about to reveal the *content* of comms between Rhodes, the Proud Boys, and Lewis.
PS6/ Here’s what we know: Lewis and 1AP spent late 2020 and early 2021 acting as security for or attending meetings with people who were liaisons between the White House and radicals—Ali Alexander, Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell, Patrick Byrne, John Eastman, Joe Oltmann and others.
PS7/ So if Stewart Rhodes and many Oath Keepers, and Enrique Tarrio and many Proud Boys, are now confirmed by DOJ to be—in the view of DOJ—participants in a Seditious Conspiracy, its next step will be to consider *other* paramilitaries those men and entities were in contact with.
PS8/ IOW, DOJ has yet to bridge the gap between its two criminal investigations: of the foot-soldiers and their leaders and the leading coup plotters inside the White House. Rhodes and Tarrio hail from the first investigation, so we have to look at possible bridges to the second.
PS9/ Needless to say no federal criminal investigator—and I briefly was one—jumps to accusing someone of wrongdoing. You rather ask, who were these new defendants (all these Seditious-Conspiracy defendant Proud Boys and Oath Keepers) talking to? And *one* answer is 1AP and Lewis.
PS10/ Of course *another* answer is the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers were in *direct* contact with 1AP protectee Ali Alexander (not to mention Stop the Steal co-organizers Roger Stone and Alex Jones). But what of Flynn, Powell, Eastman, Oltmann, and Byrne? This is why 1AP matters.
PS11/ Flynn, Powell, and Byrne were driven to the White House by 1AP the night of their fateful three-hour—Oval Office and Presidential Residence—meeting with Trump and (by phone) Eastman co-counsel Rudy Giuliani. Lewis protected all three and says he met with Eastman repeatedly.
PS12/ So as the FBI now has way over a dozen Proud Boy and Oath Keeper leaders to squeeze through federal felony charges—some of them Seditious Conspiracy—one would expect it and DOJ are trying to get a look inside the Trump-adjacent Alexander, Eastman, Flynn, Powell, Byrne camp.
PS13/ And based upon what we know of January 6 so far, one of the few folks who’s repeatedly boasted of contact with the Proud Boys/Oath Keepers *and* Stop the Steal/Team Kraken/Trump Legal is the subpoenaed Lewis, who runs an unlicensed paramilitary unit. thedailybeast.com/1st-amendment-…
PS14/ So my reaction to Tarrio and four Proud Boys being charged with Seditious Conspiracy is not so much surprise—this was anticipated—but to focus on what it means for a DOJ trying to slow-march its way from foot-soldiers to their leaders to the “liaison” class to Donald Trump.
PS15/ As ever, we’re just discussing investigative maneuvers. It’s up to DOJ to say if someone committed a crime; Americans have a 1st Amendment right to say what they think of someone and journalists can assess anyone’s potential investigative value, but the *FBI* makes arrests.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: New DOJ Seditious Conspiracy Indictment Against Five Leading Proud Boys Confirms PROOF Reporting From a Year Ago That Insurrectionists Planned to Occupy Most of the Capitol Complex, Including—As PROOF Recently Reported—Buildings GOP Members of Congress Led Tours Through
(PS) As the first public revelation of the "1776 Returns" scheme 2 months ago detailed, the Trumpist insurrectionists planned to occupy SEVEN CAPITOL COMPLEX BUILDINGS, making Rep. Loudermilk's claims he never took anyone on a tour of *Capitol* irrelevant. nytimes.com/2022/03/14/us/…
(PS2) Read this—"On the morning of the protest, they added, the document suggests having 'scouts' drive around the buildings to look for 'roadblocks'"—and then recall that Ali Alexander, using Oath Keeper and Proud Boy security, said his team would be scouting the area January 5.
Well, the one thing I won’t do is what folks often do when blocked by someone famous: lie about why. (“All I did was correct his spelling of a word and he blocked me!”)
No—I *admit* I reported accurately on Giuliani’s misconduct.
PS/ Really though, the stories folks tell when they’ve been blocked! “All I did was dive into a riptide and save his whole family from drowning, and he blocked me!” “All I did was say how amazing his feed was—instant block!” Nine times out of ten it’s a longtime troll who FAFO’d.
PS2/ In the case of me getting blocked by Rudy Giuliani, though, I quite earnestly *do* suspect that me writing a 600-page national bestseller about his domestic and international misconduct is what did it.
(🔐) KEY POINT: The just-arrested Peter Navarro coordinated his Insurrection Eve speech at Freedom Plaza with Ali Alexander. Alexander’s vile plot—detailed below—was intended to aid Navarro’s “Green Bay Sweep” coup.
(PS) Even Peter Navarro knew it was highly controversial that he had accepted Ali Alexander’s invitation to speak at Alexander’s insurrectionist January 5 rally at Freedom Plaza. It was very quickly made clear from the stage that Navarro was there in his “personal capacity.”
(PS2) Of course that’s hogwash, and everyone at Freedom Plaza on Insurrection Eve knew it was hogwash. A presidential adviser can’t appear at a rally intended to incite violence—which *did* incite violence—and exculpate the White House by saying I’m here in a “personal capacity.”
There are a few inaccuracies here—for instance the Secret Service told Trump in a report issued days before January 6 that it couldn’t protect him at the Capitol on January 6 because of dangerous conditions; he didn’t only learn that on the day—but also some good new information.
(PS) The reason small inaccuracies do matter is they often have a domino effect: if you understand that Trump was informed days before January 6 that things were going to get dangerous at the Capitol on January 6, you understand not only that he lied to the crowd on January 6...
(PS2) ...about marching with them (which he already well knew he couldn’t do) but you realize that he further incited a situation he already knew was dangerous on January 6 and deliberately put Pence in significant danger with malice aforethought. Trump’s foreknowledge is *key*.
Ask me to explain why Meadows and Scavino were spared indictment just for making gestural attempts—ultimately abandoned—to partially comply with federal subpoenas and as a lawyer and journalist and academic and historian I have absolutely no answer for you nytimes.com/2022/06/03/us/…
The importance of Meadows to the January 6 investigation is so obvious and has been so widely covered that I won’t restate it here, but as to Scavino I will note that he was present in the Oval Office when Trump first assembled his congressional allies to plot the Green Bay Sweep
There are certainly some folks who’ve taken their criticism of DOJ too far, but as readers of my feed know I have generally been among DOJ’s critics and—in the worst imaginable and least satisfying way—the events of today have proven that DOJ’s critics aren’t mere Chicken Littles
I agree with this. The scope and complexity of what happened on January 6 is such that it’s a historical event whose contours may take a decade or more to become fully clear. My criticism of DOJ has related to the pace of its investigative maneuvers—*not* the pace of indictments.
As I know from having spent years conducting and overseeing criminal investigations, the time-value of investigative maneuvers cannot be overstated.
DOJ is just now executing investigative maneuvers regarding the coup plotters it should have executed in January or February 2021.
So when people criticize those criticizing DOJ by saying their criticism is about the pace of indictments, they are constructing a straw man. Anyone who knows anything about criminal investigations is criticizing DOJ for the pace of its investigation, not the pace of indictments.