Tom Nichols Profile picture
Jun 7 11 tweets 3 min read
So, this dumb Counterpunch thing leads me to a story about working for the Navy. It's a story about challenging conventional wisdom, and how the military can be both good and bad about that. Mostly, it's a positive thing, even if it realllllly pissed me off when it happened. /1
Almost ten years ago, I wrote a book called "No Use," about nukes. It was a pretty hard critique of U.S. nuclear policy, which I said had become reflexively dependent on nukes as a kind of placeholder for strategy and hadn't let go of stupid ideas about nuclear conflict. /2
I called for unilateral reductions, minimum deterrence, de-alerting, all that stuff that nuclear hawks really, really hate. I also called for a conventional increases so that we could make real threats against rogue proliferators instead of dumb "we'll nuke you" hand-waves. /3
All this was contrary to stated U.S. policy and deeply critical of it.
The cool thing? The deputy commander of STRATCOM said: "We need to think about this. Come be part of our deterrence symposium," a big annual event. So I did. Was on a panel. Lively debate. /4
The not-cool thing is that a young Navy officer - a colleague - in the audience thinks I've gone off the rails, and calls his boss in Newport, and says Tom Nichols has gone rogue or some damn thing. This young officer means well, and tells me he did this. (I have no idea why.) /5
But then another cool thing: The guy in Newport (who has since passed away) complains to an admiral about what I'm saying and writing. A friend of mine saw the exchange: The admiral says "Uh, whatever, but the Navy doesn't tell its profs what to think or say." #GoNavy /6
I won't say much about what happened next, except that I wanted, and got, an apology. But the point is that military academics can in fact buck policy and find that there are people who want to hear what you have to say. /7
Caveat: Colleagues at other military institutions could tell you stories that did not end as well. It's a challenge, for sure. I know in one case a book angered a senior officer so much he nearly wrecked his service's war college over it. That's a story for another day. /8
I'll be writing more later in @TheAtlantic about what I experienced as a military academic, because it's not an area of the military or higher education the public gets to see much. But I could always speak my mind on anything. /9
Anyway, if you're curious why I eyerolled so hard at Counterpunch's natsec writer (an old Soviet hand from the 70s and 80s) trying to depict me as a "let's build more nukes for Europe" kind of guy, it's because I took static for years about being a nuclear *dove*. /10
Of course, this was all after they wouldn't let me smoke in the office anymore

/11x

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Nichols

Tom Nichols Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RadioFreeTom

Jun 5
Also, I’ll respond to @mehdirhasan’s accusation of Whataboutism: This whole ruckus is because I said that looking around Vegas it seemed to me the real epidemic - one we have given up on - is obesity.

But I was also making a point about politics. /1
COVID is now a stand-in for political identity. If you remain in Full Emergency Mode, you are ostensibly a caring and empathetic liberal. If you are in Vaxed and Done Mode, you are a heartless righty, even a gleeful MAGA jerk.

Most of us fall in between.
/2
Meanwhile, kids are eating themselves to death. But there’s no obvious political content in that, so - meh.

COVID - like a lot of health problems - is here to stay. But yet many of us want this to remain the Great Crisis.
It’s not 2020. It’s an ongoing problem. /3
Read 7 tweets
May 20
I think @ericowensdc has this wrong. It's not that people leave, it's that the people who stay have this sense of FOMO that's created by a nationalized culture - meaning, a culture that is no longer a quilt of different regions, but a national, homogenized, consumer culture. /1
@ericowensdc Used to be that there were variations in the national culture that made it so that you wouldn't want to leave your hometown because it was different from the cities. But the culture of the cities is now a national culture (due to media and internet and TV, etc.) This matters. /2
@ericowensdc But the culture now is stagnant. Bear with me: If you're old enough, think back 30 years, of how different everything was
- from 20 years earlier
- and varied regionally
Now, we're all city-dwellers, in a way, but some of us live in places that aren't "the city" and resent it. /3
Read 11 tweets
May 16
This is an amazing excerpt from Russian nightly television, which is usually nuts.
This guy puts it out there: We screwed up, the world hates us, this was a mistake. Watch the full clip.

A couple of thoughts about behind the scenes.

/1
The first thing I thought: Who let this segment happen, and why?
The host is treading water, but she's failing. The other guests look downcast. As they should. So I don't think this was some kind of kabuki. They know what this guy writes. They knew what he'd say. /2
A month ago, no way this guy gets airtime. So who let (or encouraged) this to happen?
None of this helps UKR, who's still getting pounded. But stitch this together with that damp squib of a VE Day speech, and Shoigu finally answering the phone, and I wonder. /3
Read 5 tweets
May 9
So, I'm still waiting for a full text of Putin's VE day speech and I have to run out and do some stuff. But seems to me that he chose the "We had to do it" line, but without declaring either victory or escalation, and will now continue to grind away at the Ukrainians. /1
I have some ideas about why this is, but they're just WAGs at this point, so I won't share them. I will note that Putin phrased the attack as preemptive war against an imminent threat - a danger I've been warning about since I wrote "Eve of Destruction" over a decade ago. /2
Big countries doing what they want to do under the guise of "preemption" - as Bush did in 2003 - is here to stay. The bar about when states go to war has changed.
As for Putin, I think this speech was a compromise within the Kremlin. Muddling through. Improvisation. /3
Read 6 tweets
May 7
In forty years of studying #Russia the thing I always struggled to get my arms around is that this remarkable and immense nation, a source of cultural and scientific genius, is also so riven by ignorance and insecurity that it is incapable of living in peace with the world. 🧵 /1
I'll write more on this another time, but it is astonishing that Russia - a nation also capable of remarkable feats of heroism and achievement - has never been able to overcome its own political culture. You can blame the Soviets for a lot of this - I do - but not all of it. /2
Other nations have managed to overcome ugly histories. Sometimes through defeat in war, sometimes through development and progress. Russians, ardently embracing a sense of victimhood, claim a special exemption, especially after WW II. They cling to it. /3
Read 11 tweets
Apr 27
If Putin insanely decides that this is a war for the survival of Russia, then we are faced with World War III. Not the rhetorical World War III loosely talked about now, but the real thing, including the deaths of hundreds of millions - in both conventional and nuclear war. /1
This could happen because of how badly the Russian military and Putin have screwed everything up. But if the only alternative is "surrender Ukraine and then all of Europe," then the world will have to fight it. It will be Russia's choice. There is no policy that will stop it. /2
There are alternatives and Putin may yet satisfy himself with his limited gains. But those of you saying "bring it on" don't know what you're talking about, and you don't understand what all of us will endure, together, if the Russians are stupid enough to go this road. /3
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(